自我孤立:精神分裂症的本体论不可能体验

IF 2.6 0 PHILOSOPHY
Clara S. Humpston
{"title":"自我孤立:精神分裂症的本体论不可能体验","authors":"Clara S. Humpston","doi":"10.1353/ppp.2022.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Most people would never question what makes a thought theirs. Nothing seems to signal ‘madness’ such as schizophrenia more than the claims that one’s thoughts and actions are not one’s own. In a sense, individuals with schizophrenia suffer from a kind of disbelief, namely the disbelief toward the Cartesian certainty. Anything that challenges this certainty is penalized by the wider society and labeled as ‘delusional,’ ‘unreal,’ and ‘false.’ After all, to go against the Cartesian certainty is to go against the authority of the first person. The core of the experience of a schizophrenic disorder lies within a labyrinth of uncertain, paradoxical, unstable and unsustainable ‘in-between’ states of thought, perception and volition that in their totality contribute to what may be termed ‘ontologically impossible’ experiences. In this paper, I aim to explain what it means to go through such experiences, their significance to the understanding of thought and perception, how they might help with the clinician’s differential diagnosis, before discussing the implications of ‘what if’ these experiences are not so impossible after all.","PeriodicalId":45397,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"15 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolated by Oneself: Ontologically Impossible Experiences in Schizophrenia\",\"authors\":\"Clara S. Humpston\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ppp.2022.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Most people would never question what makes a thought theirs. Nothing seems to signal ‘madness’ such as schizophrenia more than the claims that one’s thoughts and actions are not one’s own. In a sense, individuals with schizophrenia suffer from a kind of disbelief, namely the disbelief toward the Cartesian certainty. Anything that challenges this certainty is penalized by the wider society and labeled as ‘delusional,’ ‘unreal,’ and ‘false.’ After all, to go against the Cartesian certainty is to go against the authority of the first person. The core of the experience of a schizophrenic disorder lies within a labyrinth of uncertain, paradoxical, unstable and unsustainable ‘in-between’ states of thought, perception and volition that in their totality contribute to what may be termed ‘ontologically impossible’ experiences. In this paper, I aim to explain what it means to go through such experiences, their significance to the understanding of thought and perception, how they might help with the clinician’s differential diagnosis, before discussing the implications of ‘what if’ these experiences are not so impossible after all.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"15 - 5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2022.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy Psychiatry & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2022.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:大多数人从不质疑是什么让一个想法成为自己的。没有什么比声称自己的思想和行为不属于自己更能表明精神分裂症等“疯狂”了。从某种意义上说,精神分裂症患者患有一种不相信,即对笛卡尔确定性的不相信。任何挑战这种确定性的事情都会受到更广泛社会的惩罚,并被贴上“妄想”、“不真实”和“虚假”的标签。毕竟,违背笛卡尔的确定性就是违背第一人称的权威。精神分裂症体验的核心在于思想、感知和意志的不确定、矛盾、不稳定和不可持续的“中间”状态的迷宫,这些状态总体上导致了所谓的“本体论上不可能”的体验。在本文中,我的目标是解释经历这些经历意味着什么,它们对理解思想和感知的意义,它们如何有助于临床医生的鉴别诊断,然后讨论“如果”这些经历并非如此不可能的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Isolated by Oneself: Ontologically Impossible Experiences in Schizophrenia
Abstract:Most people would never question what makes a thought theirs. Nothing seems to signal ‘madness’ such as schizophrenia more than the claims that one’s thoughts and actions are not one’s own. In a sense, individuals with schizophrenia suffer from a kind of disbelief, namely the disbelief toward the Cartesian certainty. Anything that challenges this certainty is penalized by the wider society and labeled as ‘delusional,’ ‘unreal,’ and ‘false.’ After all, to go against the Cartesian certainty is to go against the authority of the first person. The core of the experience of a schizophrenic disorder lies within a labyrinth of uncertain, paradoxical, unstable and unsustainable ‘in-between’ states of thought, perception and volition that in their totality contribute to what may be termed ‘ontologically impossible’ experiences. In this paper, I aim to explain what it means to go through such experiences, their significance to the understanding of thought and perception, how they might help with the clinician’s differential diagnosis, before discussing the implications of ‘what if’ these experiences are not so impossible after all.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信