利用工作人员和服务数据对COVID-19大流行期间物质使用治疗进行纵向评估

SPG biomed Pub Date : 2023-04-04 DOI:10.3390/biomed3020019
Molly Carlyle, Grace Newland, L. Morris, Rhiannon Ellem, Calvert Tisdale, C. Quinn, L. Hides
{"title":"利用工作人员和服务数据对COVID-19大流行期间物质使用治疗进行纵向评估","authors":"Molly Carlyle, Grace Newland, L. Morris, Rhiannon Ellem, Calvert Tisdale, C. Quinn, L. Hides","doi":"10.3390/biomed3020019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment services were required to rapidly adapt delivery of care in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. This study examined longitudinal changes in the delivery of AOD counselling in Australia over 21 months (October 2019–July 2021) before and throughout the pandemic, using both staff self-report and service data. Methods: Treatment staff from a large AOD service in Queensland, Australia provided self-report data on time spent delivering counselling via face-to-face, outreach (home visits), telephone, and virtual (video) formats. Two waves of online questionnaires were collected, with staff reporting on their time before the pandemic (retrospectively for October 2019–February 2020); during the first lockdown period (retrospectively for March–May 2020); when restrictions were initially eased (June–September 2020); and one year later (July 2021). Service records of the number of counselling episodes conducted by each treatment modality were extracted between October 2019 and July 2021, and analysed by month. Results: Staff (n = 117) and service records indicated an increase in telephone-delivered AOD counselling during the first lockdown, alongside an increase in total counselling records. Telephone-delivered counselling was still significantly higher one year later. Face-to-face counselling declined after the onset of the pandemic, but increased quickly when restrictions were eased. Outreach counselling decreased during the first lockdown. Virtual counselling remained negligible throughout. Conclusion: AOD treatment services quickly utilised telephone counselling options at the start of the pandemic, and demonstrated continued utilisation of this method one year later. Increased virtual (video) counselling was not observed and may be due to limited infrastructure, staff training, and clients lacking Internet connectivity or technology required.","PeriodicalId":93816,"journal":{"name":"SPG biomed","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Longitudinal Assessment of Substance Use Treatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Staff and Service Data\",\"authors\":\"Molly Carlyle, Grace Newland, L. Morris, Rhiannon Ellem, Calvert Tisdale, C. Quinn, L. Hides\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/biomed3020019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment services were required to rapidly adapt delivery of care in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. This study examined longitudinal changes in the delivery of AOD counselling in Australia over 21 months (October 2019–July 2021) before and throughout the pandemic, using both staff self-report and service data. Methods: Treatment staff from a large AOD service in Queensland, Australia provided self-report data on time spent delivering counselling via face-to-face, outreach (home visits), telephone, and virtual (video) formats. Two waves of online questionnaires were collected, with staff reporting on their time before the pandemic (retrospectively for October 2019–February 2020); during the first lockdown period (retrospectively for March–May 2020); when restrictions were initially eased (June–September 2020); and one year later (July 2021). Service records of the number of counselling episodes conducted by each treatment modality were extracted between October 2019 and July 2021, and analysed by month. Results: Staff (n = 117) and service records indicated an increase in telephone-delivered AOD counselling during the first lockdown, alongside an increase in total counselling records. Telephone-delivered counselling was still significantly higher one year later. Face-to-face counselling declined after the onset of the pandemic, but increased quickly when restrictions were eased. Outreach counselling decreased during the first lockdown. Virtual counselling remained negligible throughout. Conclusion: AOD treatment services quickly utilised telephone counselling options at the start of the pandemic, and demonstrated continued utilisation of this method one year later. Increased virtual (video) counselling was not observed and may be due to limited infrastructure, staff training, and clients lacking Internet connectivity or technology required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPG biomed\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPG biomed\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed3020019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPG biomed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed3020019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:为应对冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行,需要酒精和其他药物(AOD)治疗服务来快速调整护理提供方式。本研究使用工作人员自我报告和服务数据,研究了澳大利亚在大流行之前和整个大流行期间21个月(2019年10月至2021年7月)期间AOD咨询服务的纵向变化。方法:来自澳大利亚昆士兰州一家大型AOD服务机构的治疗人员提供了关于通过面对面、外展(家访)、电话和虚拟(视频)格式提供咨询时间的自我报告数据。收集了两波在线问卷,工作人员报告了大流行前的工作时间(追溯2019年10月至2020年2月);在第一个封锁期间(追溯至2020年3月至5月);最初放宽限制的时间(2020年6月至9月);一年后(2021年7月)。提取2019年10月至2021年7月期间每种治疗方式进行的咨询次数的服务记录,并按月进行分析。结果:工作人员(n = 117)和服务记录表明,在第一次封锁期间,电话提供的AOD咨询有所增加,同时咨询记录总数也有所增加。一年后,通过电话提供咨询的人数仍然显著增加。大流行爆发后,面对面咨询有所减少,但在限制措施放松后迅速增加。在第一次封锁期间,外展咨询减少了。虚拟咨询始终是微不足道的。结论:AOD治疗服务在大流行开始时迅速利用电话咨询选择,并在一年后证明继续使用这种方法。没有观察到虚拟(视频)咨询的增加,这可能是由于基础设施有限,工作人员培训有限,客户缺乏互联网连接或所需的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Longitudinal Assessment of Substance Use Treatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Staff and Service Data
Introduction: Alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment services were required to rapidly adapt delivery of care in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. This study examined longitudinal changes in the delivery of AOD counselling in Australia over 21 months (October 2019–July 2021) before and throughout the pandemic, using both staff self-report and service data. Methods: Treatment staff from a large AOD service in Queensland, Australia provided self-report data on time spent delivering counselling via face-to-face, outreach (home visits), telephone, and virtual (video) formats. Two waves of online questionnaires were collected, with staff reporting on their time before the pandemic (retrospectively for October 2019–February 2020); during the first lockdown period (retrospectively for March–May 2020); when restrictions were initially eased (June–September 2020); and one year later (July 2021). Service records of the number of counselling episodes conducted by each treatment modality were extracted between October 2019 and July 2021, and analysed by month. Results: Staff (n = 117) and service records indicated an increase in telephone-delivered AOD counselling during the first lockdown, alongside an increase in total counselling records. Telephone-delivered counselling was still significantly higher one year later. Face-to-face counselling declined after the onset of the pandemic, but increased quickly when restrictions were eased. Outreach counselling decreased during the first lockdown. Virtual counselling remained negligible throughout. Conclusion: AOD treatment services quickly utilised telephone counselling options at the start of the pandemic, and demonstrated continued utilisation of this method one year later. Increased virtual (video) counselling was not observed and may be due to limited infrastructure, staff training, and clients lacking Internet connectivity or technology required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信