酷儿·坡:他小说的泄密核心

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Leland S. Person
{"title":"酷儿·坡:他小说的泄密核心","authors":"Leland S. Person","doi":"10.1111/J.1754-6095.2008.00002.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“When I wish to find out how wise, or how stupid, or how good, or how wicked is any one, or what are his thoughts at the moment,” C. Auguste Dupin explains in “The Purloined Letter” (1845), “I fashion the expression of my face, as accurately as possible, in accordance with the expression of his, and then wait to see what thoughts or sentiments arise in my mind or heart, as if to match or correspond with the expression” (Works, 3:984–85).1 This example of mimicry—of a man making himself “correspond” intellectually and emotionally with another man—can offer an interesting point of entry for studying connections between male relationships and the play of desire in Poe’s fiction. The possibility of a physical identification so potent that a telepathic communication of thoughts and feelings occurs between two men invites interpretation from a gay or queer perspective. Poe’s fiction includes a remarkable number of such identificatory moments, raising questions about the range of thoughts or sentiments that can arise in a man’s mind or heart under such intense conditions. To what extent can those thoughts and sentiments be understood according to homoerotic structures of desire and response? Analyzing Poe’s representation of male-male intimacy can also tell us a great deal about the nineteenth-century imaginary—about the forms that intense male relationships could take before “homosexuality” became a set of behaviors and a state of being. Jonathan Ned Katz has catalogued many examples of “sex between men” long before “homosexuality” entered the American lexicon.2 None other than Rufus Griswold, Poe’s notorious literary executor, noted the “horrible sin not to be mentioned among Christians” in his review of Whitman’s 1855 edition of Leaves of Grass.3 Robert K. Martin has also observed that from the 1840s to the 1880s, a “range of possibilities” for male-to-male relationships existed that “could run from boyhood ‘chums’ to an idealized comradeship of ‘knights-errant’ to an anguished and guilt-ridden projection of the self onto figures of Gothic evil.”4 The “figures of Gothic evil” that occupy one end of Martin’s spectrum resemble the male characters in the tales that concern me here, and their origin as “guilt-ridden projections” seems consonant with the male psychology Poe represents. Keeping in mind Katz’s","PeriodicalId":40386,"journal":{"name":"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation","volume":"61 1","pages":"30 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Queer Poe: The Tell-Tale Heart of His Fiction\",\"authors\":\"Leland S. Person\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1754-6095.2008.00002.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“When I wish to find out how wise, or how stupid, or how good, or how wicked is any one, or what are his thoughts at the moment,” C. Auguste Dupin explains in “The Purloined Letter” (1845), “I fashion the expression of my face, as accurately as possible, in accordance with the expression of his, and then wait to see what thoughts or sentiments arise in my mind or heart, as if to match or correspond with the expression” (Works, 3:984–85).1 This example of mimicry—of a man making himself “correspond” intellectually and emotionally with another man—can offer an interesting point of entry for studying connections between male relationships and the play of desire in Poe’s fiction. The possibility of a physical identification so potent that a telepathic communication of thoughts and feelings occurs between two men invites interpretation from a gay or queer perspective. Poe’s fiction includes a remarkable number of such identificatory moments, raising questions about the range of thoughts or sentiments that can arise in a man’s mind or heart under such intense conditions. To what extent can those thoughts and sentiments be understood according to homoerotic structures of desire and response? Analyzing Poe’s representation of male-male intimacy can also tell us a great deal about the nineteenth-century imaginary—about the forms that intense male relationships could take before “homosexuality” became a set of behaviors and a state of being. Jonathan Ned Katz has catalogued many examples of “sex between men” long before “homosexuality” entered the American lexicon.2 None other than Rufus Griswold, Poe’s notorious literary executor, noted the “horrible sin not to be mentioned among Christians” in his review of Whitman’s 1855 edition of Leaves of Grass.3 Robert K. Martin has also observed that from the 1840s to the 1880s, a “range of possibilities” for male-to-male relationships existed that “could run from boyhood ‘chums’ to an idealized comradeship of ‘knights-errant’ to an anguished and guilt-ridden projection of the self onto figures of Gothic evil.”4 The “figures of Gothic evil” that occupy one end of Martin’s spectrum resemble the male characters in the tales that concern me here, and their origin as “guilt-ridden projections” seems consonant with the male psychology Poe represents. Keeping in mind Katz’s\",\"PeriodicalId\":40386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"30 - 7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1754-6095.2008.00002.X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poe Studies-History Theory Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1754-6095.2008.00002.X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

“当我想找出明智,或者多么愚蠢,或者多好,或者任何一个有多邪恶,或者他有什么想法,”c·奥古斯特·杜宾解释《失窃的信》(1845),“我时尚的表达我的脸,尽可能准确,按照他的表情,然后等着看什么想法或情绪出现在我的脑海里或心脏,如果匹配或与表达”(作品,3:984 - 85)。1这个模仿的例子——一个男人让自己在智力和情感上与另一个男人“一致”——可以为研究坡小说中男性关系与欲望的关系提供一个有趣的切入点。身体认同的可能性如此强大,以至于两个男人之间发生了思想和情感的心灵感应交流,这就需要从同性恋或酷儿的角度来解释。坡的小说中包含了大量这样的认同时刻,提出了一个问题:在这种紧张的环境下,一个人的思想或情感会产生什么样的范围。这些思想和情感在多大程度上可以根据欲望和反应的同性结构来理解?分析坡对男性之间亲密关系的表现也可以告诉我们很多关于19世纪的想象——在“同性恋”成为一种行为和一种存在状态之前,强烈的男性关系可能采取的形式。早在“同性恋”一词进入美国人的词典之前,乔纳森·内德·卡茨就已经编录了许多“男人间的性行为”的例子除了鲁弗斯·格里斯沃尔德之外,坡的臭名昭著的文学遗嘱执行人,在评论惠特曼1855年版的《草叶》时,提到了“基督徒中不被提及的可怕罪恶”。3罗伯特·k·马丁也观察到,从19世纪40年代到19世纪80年代,存在着“一系列的可能性”,“从童年的‘密友’到‘侠客’的理想化同志关系,再到痛苦和内疚的自我投射到哥特式邪恶的人物身上”。马丁笔下的“哥特式邪恶人物”与我在这里所关注的故事中的男性角色很相似,而他们作为“内疚的投射”的起源似乎与坡所代表的男性心理一致。记住卡茨的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Queer Poe: The Tell-Tale Heart of His Fiction
“When I wish to find out how wise, or how stupid, or how good, or how wicked is any one, or what are his thoughts at the moment,” C. Auguste Dupin explains in “The Purloined Letter” (1845), “I fashion the expression of my face, as accurately as possible, in accordance with the expression of his, and then wait to see what thoughts or sentiments arise in my mind or heart, as if to match or correspond with the expression” (Works, 3:984–85).1 This example of mimicry—of a man making himself “correspond” intellectually and emotionally with another man—can offer an interesting point of entry for studying connections between male relationships and the play of desire in Poe’s fiction. The possibility of a physical identification so potent that a telepathic communication of thoughts and feelings occurs between two men invites interpretation from a gay or queer perspective. Poe’s fiction includes a remarkable number of such identificatory moments, raising questions about the range of thoughts or sentiments that can arise in a man’s mind or heart under such intense conditions. To what extent can those thoughts and sentiments be understood according to homoerotic structures of desire and response? Analyzing Poe’s representation of male-male intimacy can also tell us a great deal about the nineteenth-century imaginary—about the forms that intense male relationships could take before “homosexuality” became a set of behaviors and a state of being. Jonathan Ned Katz has catalogued many examples of “sex between men” long before “homosexuality” entered the American lexicon.2 None other than Rufus Griswold, Poe’s notorious literary executor, noted the “horrible sin not to be mentioned among Christians” in his review of Whitman’s 1855 edition of Leaves of Grass.3 Robert K. Martin has also observed that from the 1840s to the 1880s, a “range of possibilities” for male-to-male relationships existed that “could run from boyhood ‘chums’ to an idealized comradeship of ‘knights-errant’ to an anguished and guilt-ridden projection of the self onto figures of Gothic evil.”4 The “figures of Gothic evil” that occupy one end of Martin’s spectrum resemble the male characters in the tales that concern me here, and their origin as “guilt-ridden projections” seems consonant with the male psychology Poe represents. Keeping in mind Katz’s
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信