生理因素选择对母猪繁殖能力的影响。

R. Johnson, D. Zimmerman, W. Lamberson, S. Sasaki
{"title":"生理因素选择对母猪繁殖能力的影响。","authors":"R. Johnson, D. Zimmerman, W. Lamberson, S. Sasaki","doi":"10.1530/biosciprocs.12.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential to improve prolificacy, with major emphasis on selection for components of litter size, ovulation rate and prenatal survival, and selection for physiological factors are reviewed. Response to selection for physiological factors is superior to direct selection if physiological factors have moderate heritabilities and moderate to high genetic correlations with the trait to be improved. There are very few estimates of the genetic parameters needed to calculate the relative efficiency of direct and indirect selection. Testis size is highly heritable and positively correlated genetically with ovulation rate in both mice and pigs and may be potentially useful in an index with litter size to improve ovulation rate and prenatal survival. Selection for growth, ovulation rate or litter size has increased ovulation rate in mice, but the physiological explanations are different. Selection for litter size in a line of pigs previously selected for ovulation rate was effective; the realized heritability was 0.18 +/- 0.06. Potential improvements in litter size from index selection for ovulation rate and prenatal survival are discussed and compared to direct selection for litter size.","PeriodicalId":16956,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement","volume":"90 1","pages":"139-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influencing prolificacy of sows by selection for physiological factors.\",\"authors\":\"R. Johnson, D. Zimmerman, W. Lamberson, S. Sasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/biosciprocs.12.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The potential to improve prolificacy, with major emphasis on selection for components of litter size, ovulation rate and prenatal survival, and selection for physiological factors are reviewed. Response to selection for physiological factors is superior to direct selection if physiological factors have moderate heritabilities and moderate to high genetic correlations with the trait to be improved. There are very few estimates of the genetic parameters needed to calculate the relative efficiency of direct and indirect selection. Testis size is highly heritable and positively correlated genetically with ovulation rate in both mice and pigs and may be potentially useful in an index with litter size to improve ovulation rate and prenatal survival. Selection for growth, ovulation rate or litter size has increased ovulation rate in mice, but the physiological explanations are different. Selection for litter size in a line of pigs previously selected for ovulation rate was effective; the realized heritability was 0.18 +/- 0.06. Potential improvements in litter size from index selection for ovulation rate and prenatal survival are discussed and compared to direct selection for litter size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"139-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/biosciprocs.12.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/biosciprocs.12.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

本文综述了提高繁殖能力的潜力,重点介绍了产仔数组成部分的选择、排卵率和产前存活率以及生理因素的选择。如果生理因子与待改良性状具有中等遗传力和中高遗传相关性,则生理因子对选择的响应优于直接选择。对计算直接选择和间接选择的相对效率所需的遗传参数的估计很少。在小鼠和猪中,睾丸大小具有高度遗传性,与排卵率呈遗传正相关,并且可能在产仔数指标中潜在有用,以提高排卵率和产前存活率。对生长、排卵率或产仔数的选择增加了小鼠的排卵率,但生理学上的解释不同。在先前选择排卵率的猪系中选择产仔数是有效的;实现遗传力为0.18 +/- 0.06。本文讨论了排卵率和产前存活率指数选择对产仔数的潜在改善,并与直接选择产仔数进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influencing prolificacy of sows by selection for physiological factors.
The potential to improve prolificacy, with major emphasis on selection for components of litter size, ovulation rate and prenatal survival, and selection for physiological factors are reviewed. Response to selection for physiological factors is superior to direct selection if physiological factors have moderate heritabilities and moderate to high genetic correlations with the trait to be improved. There are very few estimates of the genetic parameters needed to calculate the relative efficiency of direct and indirect selection. Testis size is highly heritable and positively correlated genetically with ovulation rate in both mice and pigs and may be potentially useful in an index with litter size to improve ovulation rate and prenatal survival. Selection for growth, ovulation rate or litter size has increased ovulation rate in mice, but the physiological explanations are different. Selection for litter size in a line of pigs previously selected for ovulation rate was effective; the realized heritability was 0.18 +/- 0.06. Potential improvements in litter size from index selection for ovulation rate and prenatal survival are discussed and compared to direct selection for litter size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信