非洲国家药品政策对患者参与和卫生技术评估的影响

IF 2.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
K. Sehmi, J. Wale
{"title":"非洲国家药品政策对患者参与和卫生技术评估的影响","authors":"K. Sehmi, J. Wale","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2022.810456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted global knowledge about, but lack of equitable access to, life-changing medicines, and other innovative medical products by populations in African low and middle income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other international non-profit foundations and organizations are constantly striving to address inequity. In the 1970s, WHO initiated a regularly updated essential medicines list, together with the concept of national medicines policies (NMPs) to ensure access and availability, affordability, rational, and effective use of medicines which are considered essential in addressing predominant population health issues and disease burden. We studied the NMPs of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe to highlight some of the important issues that these countries experience in the safe and effective use of medical products. Thailand is an example of how health technology assessment (HTA) can provide a country with an internationally supported, clearly defined and transparent process to broaden access to medicines and services. These medical services can add considerable value in accordance with local values and priorities. Involvement of civil society adds democratic legitimacy to such processes. Community health workers and patient advocacy groups are important in raising awareness and knowledge of safety issues and the effective use of quality medicines. They can apply pressure for increased funding to improve access to healthcare. Medicines and services that contribute to supported self-care are of benefit in any setting. Joint efforts across African countries such as with the African Medicines Agency are important in addressing some of the major health issues.","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where National Medicines Policies Have Taken Us With Patient Involvement and Health Technology Assessment in Africa\",\"authors\":\"K. Sehmi, J. Wale\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmedt.2022.810456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted global knowledge about, but lack of equitable access to, life-changing medicines, and other innovative medical products by populations in African low and middle income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other international non-profit foundations and organizations are constantly striving to address inequity. In the 1970s, WHO initiated a regularly updated essential medicines list, together with the concept of national medicines policies (NMPs) to ensure access and availability, affordability, rational, and effective use of medicines which are considered essential in addressing predominant population health issues and disease burden. We studied the NMPs of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe to highlight some of the important issues that these countries experience in the safe and effective use of medical products. Thailand is an example of how health technology assessment (HTA) can provide a country with an internationally supported, clearly defined and transparent process to broaden access to medicines and services. These medical services can add considerable value in accordance with local values and priorities. Involvement of civil society adds democratic legitimacy to such processes. Community health workers and patient advocacy groups are important in raising awareness and knowledge of safety issues and the effective use of quality medicines. They can apply pressure for increased funding to improve access to healthcare. Medicines and services that contribute to supported self-care are of benefit in any setting. Joint efforts across African countries such as with the African Medicines Agency are important in addressing some of the major health issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in medical technology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in medical technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.810456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.810456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了非洲低收入和中等收入国家人口对改变生活的药物和其他创新医疗产品的了解,但缺乏公平获取。世界卫生组织(卫生组织)和其他国际非营利基金会和组织正在不断努力解决不平等问题。20世纪70年代,世卫组织启动了定期更新的基本药物清单,并提出了国家药物政策概念,以确保被认为对解决主要人口健康问题和疾病负担至关重要的药物的可及性、可负担性、合理和有效使用。我们研究了加纳、南非、乌干达和津巴布韦的nmp,以突出这些国家在安全有效使用医疗产品方面遇到的一些重要问题。泰国是一个例子,说明卫生技术评估如何能够为一个国家提供国际支持、明确界定和透明的进程,以扩大获得药品和服务的机会。根据当地的价值观和优先事项,这些医疗服务可以增加相当大的价值。民间社会的参与增加了这些进程的民主合法性。社区卫生工作者和患者倡导团体在提高对安全问题和有效使用优质药物的认识和知识方面很重要。他们可以施加压力,要求增加资金,以改善获得医疗保健的机会。有助于支持自我保健的药物和服务在任何情况下都是有益的。非洲各国的共同努力,例如与非洲药品管理局的共同努力,对于解决一些重大卫生问题非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Where National Medicines Policies Have Taken Us With Patient Involvement and Health Technology Assessment in Africa
The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted global knowledge about, but lack of equitable access to, life-changing medicines, and other innovative medical products by populations in African low and middle income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other international non-profit foundations and organizations are constantly striving to address inequity. In the 1970s, WHO initiated a regularly updated essential medicines list, together with the concept of national medicines policies (NMPs) to ensure access and availability, affordability, rational, and effective use of medicines which are considered essential in addressing predominant population health issues and disease burden. We studied the NMPs of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe to highlight some of the important issues that these countries experience in the safe and effective use of medical products. Thailand is an example of how health technology assessment (HTA) can provide a country with an internationally supported, clearly defined and transparent process to broaden access to medicines and services. These medical services can add considerable value in accordance with local values and priorities. Involvement of civil society adds democratic legitimacy to such processes. Community health workers and patient advocacy groups are important in raising awareness and knowledge of safety issues and the effective use of quality medicines. They can apply pressure for increased funding to improve access to healthcare. Medicines and services that contribute to supported self-care are of benefit in any setting. Joint efforts across African countries such as with the African Medicines Agency are important in addressing some of the major health issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信