用怀疑p $$ p $$值评估可复制性:I型误差控制和样本量计划

IF 1.4 3区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Charlotte Micheloud, F. Balabdaoui, L. Held
{"title":"用怀疑p $$ p $$值评估可复制性:I型误差控制和样本量计划","authors":"Charlotte Micheloud, F. Balabdaoui, L. Held","doi":"10.1111/stan.12312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study a statistical framework for replicability based on a recently proposed quantitative measure of replication success, the sceptical p$$ p $$ ‐value. A recalibration is proposed to obtain exact overall Type‐I error control if the effect is null in both studies and additional bounds on the partial and conditional Type‐I error rate, which represent the case where only one study has a null effect. The approach avoids the double dichotomization for significance of the two‐trials rule and has larger project power to detect existing effects over both studies in combination. It can also be used for power calculations and requires a smaller replication sample size than the two‐trials rule for already convincing original studies. We illustrate the performance of the proposed methodology in an application to data from the Experimental Economics Replication Project.","PeriodicalId":51178,"journal":{"name":"Statistica Neerlandica","volume":"77 1","pages":"573 - 591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing replicability with the sceptical p$$ p $$ ‐value: Type‐I error control and sample size planning\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Micheloud, F. Balabdaoui, L. Held\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/stan.12312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study a statistical framework for replicability based on a recently proposed quantitative measure of replication success, the sceptical p$$ p $$ ‐value. A recalibration is proposed to obtain exact overall Type‐I error control if the effect is null in both studies and additional bounds on the partial and conditional Type‐I error rate, which represent the case where only one study has a null effect. The approach avoids the double dichotomization for significance of the two‐trials rule and has larger project power to detect existing effects over both studies in combination. It can also be used for power calculations and requires a smaller replication sample size than the two‐trials rule for already convincing original studies. We illustrate the performance of the proposed methodology in an application to data from the Experimental Economics Replication Project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistica Neerlandica\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"573 - 591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistica Neerlandica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12312\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistica Neerlandica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们研究了一个统计框架的可复制性基于最近提出的复制成功的定量测量,怀疑p $$ p $$‐值。如果两项研究的影响为零,以及部分和条件型I错误率的附加界限,则建议重新校准以获得精确的总体型I误差控制,这代表了只有一项研究具有零效应的情况。该方法避免了两次试验规则显著性的双重二分法,并且具有更大的项目能力来检测两项研究合并后的现有效应。它也可以用于功率计算,并且需要比已经令人信服的原始研究的两次试验规则更小的复制样本量。我们在实验经济学复制项目的数据应用中说明了所提出方法的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing replicability with the sceptical p$$ p $$ ‐value: Type‐I error control and sample size planning
We study a statistical framework for replicability based on a recently proposed quantitative measure of replication success, the sceptical p$$ p $$ ‐value. A recalibration is proposed to obtain exact overall Type‐I error control if the effect is null in both studies and additional bounds on the partial and conditional Type‐I error rate, which represent the case where only one study has a null effect. The approach avoids the double dichotomization for significance of the two‐trials rule and has larger project power to detect existing effects over both studies in combination. It can also be used for power calculations and requires a smaller replication sample size than the two‐trials rule for already convincing original studies. We illustrate the performance of the proposed methodology in an application to data from the Experimental Economics Replication Project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistica Neerlandica
Statistica Neerlandica 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistica Neerlandica has been the journal of the Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research since 1946. It covers all areas of statistics, from theoretical to applied, with a special emphasis on mathematical statistics, statistics for the behavioural sciences and biostatistics. This wide scope is reflected by the expertise of the journal’s editors representing these areas. The diverse editorial board is committed to a fast and fair reviewing process, and will judge submissions on quality, correctness, relevance and originality. Statistica Neerlandica encourages transparency and reproducibility, and offers online resources to make data, code, simulation results and other additional materials publicly available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信