{"title":"在科学知识的两种哲学概念背景下的科学优先问题","authors":"A. M. Krivchikov","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-116-126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores 2 opposite approaches to the authorship of the special theory of relativity. The first assumes that Albert Einstein is the only scientist whose contribution to the development of science allowed the creation of SRT. The second approach proclaims that the theory of relativity is the product of the collective activity of many scientists who have been working on its creation for decades.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ISSUES OF SCIENTIFIC PRIORITY AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF TWO PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Krivchikov\",\"doi\":\"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-116-126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article explores 2 opposite approaches to the authorship of the special theory of relativity. The first assumes that Albert Einstein is the only scientist whose contribution to the development of science allowed the creation of SRT. The second approach proclaims that the theory of relativity is the product of the collective activity of many scientists who have been working on its creation for decades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-116-126\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-116-126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
ISSUES OF SCIENTIFIC PRIORITY AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF TWO PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
The article explores 2 opposite approaches to the authorship of the special theory of relativity. The first assumes that Albert Einstein is the only scientist whose contribution to the development of science allowed the creation of SRT. The second approach proclaims that the theory of relativity is the product of the collective activity of many scientists who have been working on its creation for decades.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
