学生对卫生专业微生物学课程主动学习的态度

A. Lowrey
{"title":"学生对卫生专业微生物学课程主动学习的态度","authors":"A. Lowrey","doi":"10.19030/AJHS.V7I2.9842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While many active learning strategies are evidence-based, it is unclear as to which methods are preferred by most students. In the present study students in an undergraduate health professions microbiology course were assigned four projects (“types” 1 – 4) that included elements of active learning and that required students to apply microbiological concepts to health care or public health. A type 1 project involved the student consulting professional journals, textbooks and/or websites and preparing an informative brochure on an infectious disease suitable for reading by the lay public. A type 2 project involved the student shadowing a health care professional. A type 3 project involved the student performing a community service. A type 4 project involved the student designing and conducting an original lab research study. A survey was used to assess student attitudes about doing these projects. I report that while some students preferred particular project types, no project type was preferred by a majority of students. In addition, students ranked all four project types highly and considered them all to have equal educational value and relevance to course content. These results suggest that instructors should avoid using a “one size fits all” active learning approach. Students value the use of diverse pedagogical approches that engage their learning in different ways and that connect course concepts to real-world applications.","PeriodicalId":89884,"journal":{"name":"American journal of health sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"39-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Attitudes Regarding Active Learning In Health Professions Microbiology Course\",\"authors\":\"A. Lowrey\",\"doi\":\"10.19030/AJHS.V7I2.9842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While many active learning strategies are evidence-based, it is unclear as to which methods are preferred by most students. In the present study students in an undergraduate health professions microbiology course were assigned four projects (“types” 1 – 4) that included elements of active learning and that required students to apply microbiological concepts to health care or public health. A type 1 project involved the student consulting professional journals, textbooks and/or websites and preparing an informative brochure on an infectious disease suitable for reading by the lay public. A type 2 project involved the student shadowing a health care professional. A type 3 project involved the student performing a community service. A type 4 project involved the student designing and conducting an original lab research study. A survey was used to assess student attitudes about doing these projects. I report that while some students preferred particular project types, no project type was preferred by a majority of students. In addition, students ranked all four project types highly and considered them all to have equal educational value and relevance to course content. These results suggest that instructors should avoid using a “one size fits all” active learning approach. Students value the use of diverse pedagogical approches that engage their learning in different ways and that connect course concepts to real-world applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of health sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"39-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19030/AJHS.V7I2.9842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/AJHS.V7I2.9842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然许多主动学习策略都是基于证据的,但目前还不清楚大多数学生更喜欢哪种方法。在本研究中,卫生专业本科微生物学课程的学生被分配了四个项目(“类型”1 - 4),这些项目包括主动学习的要素,并要求学生将微生物概念应用于卫生保健或公共卫生。第一类项目涉及学生查阅专业期刊、教科书和/或网站,并编写一份适合非专业公众阅读的传染病信息小册子。在第二类项目中,学生跟随一位医疗保健专业人员。第三类项目涉及学生进行社区服务。第4类项目要求学生设计并进行一项原创的实验室研究。一项调查被用来评估学生对做这些项目的态度。我报告说,虽然有些学生喜欢特定的项目类型,但大多数学生都不喜欢项目类型。此外,学生对所有四种项目类型都给予了很高的评价,并认为它们都具有同等的教育价值和与课程内容的相关性。这些结果表明,教师应避免使用“一刀切”的主动学习方法。学生重视使用多样化的教学方法,以不同的方式参与他们的学习,并将课程概念与现实世界的应用联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student Attitudes Regarding Active Learning In Health Professions Microbiology Course
While many active learning strategies are evidence-based, it is unclear as to which methods are preferred by most students. In the present study students in an undergraduate health professions microbiology course were assigned four projects (“types” 1 – 4) that included elements of active learning and that required students to apply microbiological concepts to health care or public health. A type 1 project involved the student consulting professional journals, textbooks and/or websites and preparing an informative brochure on an infectious disease suitable for reading by the lay public. A type 2 project involved the student shadowing a health care professional. A type 3 project involved the student performing a community service. A type 4 project involved the student designing and conducting an original lab research study. A survey was used to assess student attitudes about doing these projects. I report that while some students preferred particular project types, no project type was preferred by a majority of students. In addition, students ranked all four project types highly and considered them all to have equal educational value and relevance to course content. These results suggest that instructors should avoid using a “one size fits all” active learning approach. Students value the use of diverse pedagogical approches that engage their learning in different ways and that connect course concepts to real-world applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信