训练方式与体重指数对五人制运动员踝关节损伤的影响

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
Vika Ariesti Audini, Muchsin Doewes, Sri Santoso Sabarini, S. Riyadi
{"title":"训练方式与体重指数对五人制运动员踝关节损伤的影响","authors":"Vika Ariesti Audini, Muchsin Doewes, Sri Santoso Sabarini, S. Riyadi","doi":"10.58962/ht.2023.1.3.38-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale and purpose\nThis study aims to determine the effect of training methods (elastic resistance bands and wobble boards) and body mass index on ankle injuries in futsal players.\nMaterial and Methods \nThis research refers to a quantitative approach. The research used in this study is quasi-experimental design research. The normality test uses the Shapiro Wilk test, with the rule that if the value (p) > 0.05 then it is normally distributed. The homogeneity test uses the Levene’s Test. Test the hypothesis to determine the difference in influence between 2 variables will use the two-way ANAVA test.\nResults \nThe use of a wobble board produces a better improvement effect especially on balance and coordination. This happens because the movement when doing the wobble board requires good balance and coordination, almost all the muscles of the body will work together to adapt to this exercise. In elastic resistance band exercises it is done with isometric muscle contractions, because it will give a reaction but there is no change in muscle length, only the muscles increase. The effect of training using elastic resistance bands will increase blood circulation in joints and bone nutrition, improve the circulatory system with pull band movements. In relation to the search for both high body mass index and low body mass index, it was found that the use of the training method with a wobble board is better when compared to the training method with elastic resistance bands. So that there is no significant interaction between training methods and body mass index. Hypothesis Test I: to test the significance of two paired samples in the treatment group with normally distributed data, a parametric test was used, namely the paired sample t-test. Data on the results of hypothesis testing I from the analysis p = 0,009 it was found that there was an effect of giving Elastic resistance band and wobble board training methods to ankle injuries of futsal players. Hypothesis Test II: can be seen that the results of the paired sample t-test for SEBT from the data obtained p = 0,704 this means that Ha is rejected and Ho is accepted. So it can be concluded that body mass index has no effects on ankle injuries in futsal players. Hypothesis Test III: There is no interaction between training methods and body mass index on ankle injuries of futsal players. From the analysis of variance, the p-value = 0,477 is less than 0,05.\nConclusions \nBased on the research, it can be interpreted that there are differences in the effect of the training methods given to futsal players’ ankle injuries. This is evidenced by the significance value of p = 0,003 α (0,05). There is no interaction between training methods and body mass index on ankle injuries of futsal players with a significance of 0,813.","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":"35 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of training methods and body mass index on ankle injury in futsal players\",\"authors\":\"Vika Ariesti Audini, Muchsin Doewes, Sri Santoso Sabarini, S. Riyadi\",\"doi\":\"10.58962/ht.2023.1.3.38-45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rationale and purpose\\nThis study aims to determine the effect of training methods (elastic resistance bands and wobble boards) and body mass index on ankle injuries in futsal players.\\nMaterial and Methods \\nThis research refers to a quantitative approach. The research used in this study is quasi-experimental design research. The normality test uses the Shapiro Wilk test, with the rule that if the value (p) > 0.05 then it is normally distributed. The homogeneity test uses the Levene’s Test. Test the hypothesis to determine the difference in influence between 2 variables will use the two-way ANAVA test.\\nResults \\nThe use of a wobble board produces a better improvement effect especially on balance and coordination. This happens because the movement when doing the wobble board requires good balance and coordination, almost all the muscles of the body will work together to adapt to this exercise. In elastic resistance band exercises it is done with isometric muscle contractions, because it will give a reaction but there is no change in muscle length, only the muscles increase. The effect of training using elastic resistance bands will increase blood circulation in joints and bone nutrition, improve the circulatory system with pull band movements. In relation to the search for both high body mass index and low body mass index, it was found that the use of the training method with a wobble board is better when compared to the training method with elastic resistance bands. So that there is no significant interaction between training methods and body mass index. Hypothesis Test I: to test the significance of two paired samples in the treatment group with normally distributed data, a parametric test was used, namely the paired sample t-test. Data on the results of hypothesis testing I from the analysis p = 0,009 it was found that there was an effect of giving Elastic resistance band and wobble board training methods to ankle injuries of futsal players. Hypothesis Test II: can be seen that the results of the paired sample t-test for SEBT from the data obtained p = 0,704 this means that Ha is rejected and Ho is accepted. So it can be concluded that body mass index has no effects on ankle injuries in futsal players. Hypothesis Test III: There is no interaction between training methods and body mass index on ankle injuries of futsal players. From the analysis of variance, the p-value = 0,477 is less than 0,05.\\nConclusions \\nBased on the research, it can be interpreted that there are differences in the effect of the training methods given to futsal players’ ankle injuries. This is evidenced by the significance value of p = 0,003 α (0,05). There is no interaction between training methods and body mass index on ankle injuries of futsal players with a significance of 0,813.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\"35 6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58962/ht.2023.1.3.38-45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58962/ht.2023.1.3.38-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理与目的本研究旨在探讨弹性阻力带和摇摆板训练方法及身体质量指数对五人制足球运动员踝关节损伤的影响。材料与方法本研究采用定量方法。本研究采用准实验设计研究。正态性检验使用夏皮罗威尔克检验,其规则是,如果值(p)小于0.05,则它是正态分布。同质性检验采用Levene检验。检验假设以确定两个变量之间的影响差异将使用双向ANAVA检验。结果摆动板的使用对平衡性和协调性有较好的改善效果。这是因为做摇板时的动作需要良好的平衡性和协调性,几乎身体所有的肌肉都会一起工作来适应这个运动。在弹性阻力带练习中,它是在肌肉收缩的情况下完成的,因为它会产生反应,但肌肉长度没有变化,只有肌肉增加。使用弹性阻力带训练的效果会增加关节的血液循环和骨骼营养,用拉带运动改善循环系统。在对高体重指数和低体重指数的搜索中,我们发现使用摆动板的训练方法比使用弹性阻力带的训练方法效果更好。因此,训练方法与身体质量指数之间没有显著的相互作用。假设检验一:为检验处理组中数据正态分布的两个配对样本的显著性,采用参数检验,即配对样本t检验。从分析p = 0.009的假设检验结果I的数据中发现,给予弹性阻力带和摇摆板训练方法对五人制足球运动员踝关节损伤有影响。假设检验II:从所获得的数据可以看出,SEBT的配对样本t检验结果p = 0,704,这意味着Ha被拒绝,Ho被接受。因此,可以得出体重指数对五人制足球运动员踝关节损伤没有影响的结论。假设检验三:训练方式与体重指数对五人制足球运动员踝关节损伤无交互作用。从方差分析来看,p值= 0,477小于0,05。通过研究可以看出,五人制足球运动员踝关节损伤的不同训练方式的效果存在差异。p = 0.003 α(0.05)的显著性值证明了这一点。训练方式与体重指数对五人制足球运动员踝关节损伤无交互作用,显著性为0.813。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of training methods and body mass index on ankle injury in futsal players
Rationale and purpose This study aims to determine the effect of training methods (elastic resistance bands and wobble boards) and body mass index on ankle injuries in futsal players. Material and Methods This research refers to a quantitative approach. The research used in this study is quasi-experimental design research. The normality test uses the Shapiro Wilk test, with the rule that if the value (p) > 0.05 then it is normally distributed. The homogeneity test uses the Levene’s Test. Test the hypothesis to determine the difference in influence between 2 variables will use the two-way ANAVA test. Results The use of a wobble board produces a better improvement effect especially on balance and coordination. This happens because the movement when doing the wobble board requires good balance and coordination, almost all the muscles of the body will work together to adapt to this exercise. In elastic resistance band exercises it is done with isometric muscle contractions, because it will give a reaction but there is no change in muscle length, only the muscles increase. The effect of training using elastic resistance bands will increase blood circulation in joints and bone nutrition, improve the circulatory system with pull band movements. In relation to the search for both high body mass index and low body mass index, it was found that the use of the training method with a wobble board is better when compared to the training method with elastic resistance bands. So that there is no significant interaction between training methods and body mass index. Hypothesis Test I: to test the significance of two paired samples in the treatment group with normally distributed data, a parametric test was used, namely the paired sample t-test. Data on the results of hypothesis testing I from the analysis p = 0,009 it was found that there was an effect of giving Elastic resistance band and wobble board training methods to ankle injuries of futsal players. Hypothesis Test II: can be seen that the results of the paired sample t-test for SEBT from the data obtained p = 0,704 this means that Ha is rejected and Ho is accepted. So it can be concluded that body mass index has no effects on ankle injuries in futsal players. Hypothesis Test III: There is no interaction between training methods and body mass index on ankle injuries of futsal players. From the analysis of variance, the p-value = 0,477 is less than 0,05. Conclusions Based on the research, it can be interpreted that there are differences in the effect of the training methods given to futsal players’ ankle injuries. This is evidenced by the significance value of p = 0,003 α (0,05). There is no interaction between training methods and body mass index on ankle injuries of futsal players with a significance of 0,813.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信