Hailiu Shi, Shengqun Chen, Yingming Wang, Yan Huang
{"title":"同行视角下以管理目标为参照点的交叉效率评价方法","authors":"Hailiu Shi, Shengqun Chen, Yingming Wang, Yan Huang","doi":"10.1142/s0217595921500408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the management by objectives (MBO) theory, performance evaluations should take into account the achievement of management objectives (MOs). The most commonly used performance evaluation method — the cross-efficiency evaluation method — seldom considers the role of MOs as a reference point. According to the prospect theory, decision-makers underestimate the benefits that exceed the reference point; they also exaggerate the losses that fall below the reference point. This irrational psychology is more obvious when evaluating the performance evaluation of peers. As such, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method based on prospect theory, which takes MOs as a reference point from a peer perspective. First, taking MOs as reference points, a decision-making unit (DMU) chooses a set of weights for each peer, in order to maximize or minimize the prospects of the peer, according to the benevolent or aggressive attitude of the DMU. In order to improve the adaptability of the method, the precise number of MOs is further extended to be an interval number. Finally, the relationship between models, which are based on precise MOs and interval MOs, is illustrated by propositions. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method.","PeriodicalId":8478,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Taking Management Objectives as Reference Points from Peer Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Hailiu Shi, Shengqun Chen, Yingming Wang, Yan Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s0217595921500408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the management by objectives (MBO) theory, performance evaluations should take into account the achievement of management objectives (MOs). The most commonly used performance evaluation method — the cross-efficiency evaluation method — seldom considers the role of MOs as a reference point. According to the prospect theory, decision-makers underestimate the benefits that exceed the reference point; they also exaggerate the losses that fall below the reference point. This irrational psychology is more obvious when evaluating the performance evaluation of peers. As such, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method based on prospect theory, which takes MOs as a reference point from a peer perspective. First, taking MOs as reference points, a decision-making unit (DMU) chooses a set of weights for each peer, in order to maximize or minimize the prospects of the peer, according to the benevolent or aggressive attitude of the DMU. In order to improve the adaptability of the method, the precise number of MOs is further extended to be an interval number. Finally, the relationship between models, which are based on precise MOs and interval MOs, is illustrated by propositions. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217595921500408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217595921500408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
根据目标管理(MBO)理论,绩效评价应考虑管理目标的实现情况。目前最常用的绩效评价方法——交叉效率评价方法,很少考虑组织管理组织作为参考点的作用。根据前景理论,决策者低估了超过参考点的收益;他们还夸大了低于参考点的损失。这种非理性心理在评价同伴的绩效评价时表现得更为明显。为此,本文提出了一种基于前景理论的交叉效率评价方法,该方法从同行视角出发,以最大收益为参考点。首先,决策单元(decision-making unit, DMU)以MOs为参考点,根据决策单元的仁慈态度或攻击性态度,为每个同伴选择一组权重,以最大化或最小化同伴的前景。为了提高该方法的适应性,将MOs的精确数进一步扩展为区间数。最后,用命题说明了基于精确模态和区间模态的模型之间的关系。最后,通过数值算例说明了交叉效率评价方法的应用。
Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Taking Management Objectives as Reference Points from Peer Perspective
According to the management by objectives (MBO) theory, performance evaluations should take into account the achievement of management objectives (MOs). The most commonly used performance evaluation method — the cross-efficiency evaluation method — seldom considers the role of MOs as a reference point. According to the prospect theory, decision-makers underestimate the benefits that exceed the reference point; they also exaggerate the losses that fall below the reference point. This irrational psychology is more obvious when evaluating the performance evaluation of peers. As such, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method based on prospect theory, which takes MOs as a reference point from a peer perspective. First, taking MOs as reference points, a decision-making unit (DMU) chooses a set of weights for each peer, in order to maximize or minimize the prospects of the peer, according to the benevolent or aggressive attitude of the DMU. In order to improve the adaptability of the method, the precise number of MOs is further extended to be an interval number. Finally, the relationship between models, which are based on precise MOs and interval MOs, is illustrated by propositions. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method.