艺术、建筑和设计相关学科的引文分析和任期指标

IF 0.2 0 ART
Art Documentation Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.1086/688724
Maya Gervits, R. Orcutt
{"title":"艺术、建筑和设计相关学科的引文分析和任期指标","authors":"Maya Gervits, R. Orcutt","doi":"10.1086/688724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even with the growing number of tools designed to evaluate research in different fields, coverage of arts and humanities remains limited. These disciplines are not well served by the popular citation-based instruments, both traditional and alternative. The authors argue that no single metric can be used for research assessment. There is a need to adopt commonly accepted indicators for arts and design disciplines and to create a more holistic model for scholarship evaluation— a model that takes into consideration various measures of impact and multiple research outputs.","PeriodicalId":43009,"journal":{"name":"Art Documentation","volume":"29 1","pages":"218 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citation Analysis and Tenure Metrics in Art, Architecture, and Design-Related Disciplines\",\"authors\":\"Maya Gervits, R. Orcutt\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/688724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even with the growing number of tools designed to evaluate research in different fields, coverage of arts and humanities remains limited. These disciplines are not well served by the popular citation-based instruments, both traditional and alternative. The authors argue that no single metric can be used for research assessment. There is a need to adopt commonly accepted indicators for arts and design disciplines and to create a more holistic model for scholarship evaluation— a model that takes into consideration various measures of impact and multiple research outputs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art Documentation\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"218 - 229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art Documentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/688724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/688724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

尽管设计用于评估不同领域研究的工具越来越多,但艺术和人文学科的覆盖范围仍然有限。这些学科没有很好地服务于流行的基于引用的工具,无论是传统的还是替代的。作者认为,没有单一的指标可以用于研究评估。有必要为艺术和设计学科采用普遍接受的指标,并建立一个更全面的奖学金评估模型——一个考虑到各种影响指标和多种研究成果的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Citation Analysis and Tenure Metrics in Art, Architecture, and Design-Related Disciplines
Even with the growing number of tools designed to evaluate research in different fields, coverage of arts and humanities remains limited. These disciplines are not well served by the popular citation-based instruments, both traditional and alternative. The authors argue that no single metric can be used for research assessment. There is a need to adopt commonly accepted indicators for arts and design disciplines and to create a more holistic model for scholarship evaluation— a model that takes into consideration various measures of impact and multiple research outputs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信