TU7.8按次付费:虚拟视频诊所的成本与满意度

C. Clements, S. Bezzaa, Gemma Graham, Emmanuel Tharmarajah, K. Jamal, T. Lewis
{"title":"TU7.8按次付费:虚拟视频诊所的成本与满意度","authors":"C. Clements, S. Bezzaa, Gemma Graham, Emmanuel Tharmarajah, K. Jamal, T. Lewis","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac248.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated use of video consultations to provide continued patient care. It is not clear if video clinics are well received by patients, or if they are cost efficient. We evaluate the benefits of video consultation and review the impact on waiting times and cost implications to a trust. Methods 100 patients referred between January - December 2021 with gallstones were invited to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire after initial clinic consultation. Patients were divided into three groups based on consultation type; face-to-face, telephone and video consultation (via the Attend Anywhere platform). Secondary outcome measures included time from referral to appointment, time to final outcome and cost implications. Results 93 patients responded; 33 video, 30 face-to-face and 30 telephone consultations. Of these patients 62% were female and 38% male with an average age of 51 (25–84). Average time from referral was 22 days in the video cohort, 22 in the telephone cohort and 32 for face-to-face appointments. Of the video cohort, 44% were booked for cholecystectomy from initial consultation and 56% sent for further investigation. The conversion rate from video to face-to-face consultation was zero. 50% of respondents stated face-to-face consultations as their preferred method of future consultation, 49% of patients opted for video and 1% preferred telephone consultation. 79% reported increased satisfaction due to convenience of consultation. Conclusion This study demonstrates video consultations decrease costs and waiting times. Patient satisfaction is comparable to in-person visit. Specific referral criteria and patient selection is essential to maximise the benefits of video consultations.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TU7.8 Pay Per View: Cost and Satisfaction of Virtual Video Clinics\",\"authors\":\"C. Clements, S. Bezzaa, Gemma Graham, Emmanuel Tharmarajah, K. Jamal, T. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjs/znac248.070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Aims The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated use of video consultations to provide continued patient care. It is not clear if video clinics are well received by patients, or if they are cost efficient. We evaluate the benefits of video consultation and review the impact on waiting times and cost implications to a trust. Methods 100 patients referred between January - December 2021 with gallstones were invited to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire after initial clinic consultation. Patients were divided into three groups based on consultation type; face-to-face, telephone and video consultation (via the Attend Anywhere platform). Secondary outcome measures included time from referral to appointment, time to final outcome and cost implications. Results 93 patients responded; 33 video, 30 face-to-face and 30 telephone consultations. Of these patients 62% were female and 38% male with an average age of 51 (25–84). Average time from referral was 22 days in the video cohort, 22 in the telephone cohort and 32 for face-to-face appointments. Of the video cohort, 44% were booked for cholecystectomy from initial consultation and 56% sent for further investigation. The conversion rate from video to face-to-face consultation was zero. 50% of respondents stated face-to-face consultations as their preferred method of future consultation, 49% of patients opted for video and 1% preferred telephone consultation. 79% reported increased satisfaction due to convenience of consultation. Conclusion This study demonstrates video consultations decrease costs and waiting times. Patient satisfaction is comparable to in-person visit. Specific referral criteria and patient selection is essential to maximise the benefits of video consultations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of oral surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of oral surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac248.070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of oral surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac248.070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的新型冠状病毒肺炎(Covid-19)大流行需要使用视频会诊来提供持续的患者护理。目前尚不清楚视频诊所是否受到患者的欢迎,或者它们是否具有成本效益。我们评估视频咨询的好处,并审查对等待时间的影响和对信托的成本影响。方法对100例于2021年1月至12月就诊的胆结石患者进行初步临床会诊,填写患者满意度问卷。根据会诊类型将患者分为三组;面对面、电话和视频咨询(通过Attend Anywhere平台)。次要结果测量包括从转诊到预约的时间,到最终结果的时间和成本影响。结果93例患者缓解;33次视频咨询,30次面对面咨询,30次电话咨询。其中62%为女性,38%为男性,平均年龄51岁(25-84岁)。视频队列的平均转诊时间为22天,电话队列为22天,面对面预约为32天。在视频队列中,44%的人从最初的咨询中预约了胆囊切除术,56%的人被送去进一步调查。从视频到面对面咨询的转化率为零。50%的受访者表示面对面咨询是他们未来咨询的首选方法,49%的患者选择视频咨询,1%的患者选择电话咨询。79%的人表示,由于咨询方便,满意度提高了。结论视频会诊降低了费用和等待时间。患者满意度与亲自就诊相当。具体的转诊标准和患者选择是至关重要的,以最大限度地发挥视频咨询的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TU7.8 Pay Per View: Cost and Satisfaction of Virtual Video Clinics
Abstract Aims The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated use of video consultations to provide continued patient care. It is not clear if video clinics are well received by patients, or if they are cost efficient. We evaluate the benefits of video consultation and review the impact on waiting times and cost implications to a trust. Methods 100 patients referred between January - December 2021 with gallstones were invited to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire after initial clinic consultation. Patients were divided into three groups based on consultation type; face-to-face, telephone and video consultation (via the Attend Anywhere platform). Secondary outcome measures included time from referral to appointment, time to final outcome and cost implications. Results 93 patients responded; 33 video, 30 face-to-face and 30 telephone consultations. Of these patients 62% were female and 38% male with an average age of 51 (25–84). Average time from referral was 22 days in the video cohort, 22 in the telephone cohort and 32 for face-to-face appointments. Of the video cohort, 44% were booked for cholecystectomy from initial consultation and 56% sent for further investigation. The conversion rate from video to face-to-face consultation was zero. 50% of respondents stated face-to-face consultations as their preferred method of future consultation, 49% of patients opted for video and 1% preferred telephone consultation. 79% reported increased satisfaction due to convenience of consultation. Conclusion This study demonstrates video consultations decrease costs and waiting times. Patient satisfaction is comparable to in-person visit. Specific referral criteria and patient selection is essential to maximise the benefits of video consultations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信