用结构向量自回归模型量化美联储的目标

Shengliang Ou, Donghai Zhang
{"title":"用结构向量自回归模型量化美联储的目标","authors":"Shengliang Ou, Donghai Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3522455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) objective, namely, its dovish stance, is often blamed for the so-called Great Inflation. A popular proxy for the former is constructed using the inflation coefficients in estimated Taylor rules. However, for a welfare-optimizing central bank, the estimated Taylor coefficients are not sufficient for inferring its underlying preference. We quantify Fed’s objective—the targeting rule—relying on a conditional estimator (Galí and Gambetti 2018) that is free of the classical simultaneity problem. We discover that Fed’s targeting rule remained stable during the pre- and post-Volcker periods—the opposite of what is implied through a Taylor rule estimation.","PeriodicalId":10548,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the Federal Reserve’s Objectives Using a Structural Vector Autoregressive Model\",\"authors\":\"Shengliang Ou, Donghai Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3522455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) objective, namely, its dovish stance, is often blamed for the so-called Great Inflation. A popular proxy for the former is constructed using the inflation coefficients in estimated Taylor rules. However, for a welfare-optimizing central bank, the estimated Taylor coefficients are not sufficient for inferring its underlying preference. We quantify Fed’s objective—the targeting rule—relying on a conditional estimator (Galí and Gambetti 2018) that is free of the classical simultaneity problem. We discover that Fed’s targeting rule remained stable during the pre- and post-Volcker periods—the opposite of what is implied through a Taylor rule estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3522455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3522455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美联储(Fed)的目标,即其鸽派立场,经常被指责为所谓的大通胀的罪魁祸首。前者的一个流行的代理是使用估计泰勒规则中的膨胀系数构造的。然而,对于福利优化的中央银行,估计的泰勒系数不足以推断其潜在偏好。我们量化了美联储的目标——目标规则——依赖于一个不存在经典同时性问题的条件估计器(Galí和Gambetti 2018)。我们发现,美联储的目标规则在沃尔克之前和之后的时期保持稳定,这与泰勒规则估计所暗示的相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying the Federal Reserve’s Objectives Using a Structural Vector Autoregressive Model
The Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) objective, namely, its dovish stance, is often blamed for the so-called Great Inflation. A popular proxy for the former is constructed using the inflation coefficients in estimated Taylor rules. However, for a welfare-optimizing central bank, the estimated Taylor coefficients are not sufficient for inferring its underlying preference. We quantify Fed’s objective—the targeting rule—relying on a conditional estimator (Galí and Gambetti 2018) that is free of the classical simultaneity problem. We discover that Fed’s targeting rule remained stable during the pre- and post-Volcker periods—the opposite of what is implied through a Taylor rule estimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信