{"title":"对非法药物的\"公共卫生\"方针:卫生伪装下的根除性药物话语?","authors":"Steven Debbaut, Tobias Kammersgaard","doi":"10.1108/dhs-09-2022-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to problematize current calls for a “public health” approach to governing illicit drugs and the people who use them.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIt draws on a range of historical sources to describe how drugs became a problem for governments, in order to critically diagnose the present and investigate the origins of current perspectives on drugs.\n\n\nFindings\nIt is argued that there are currently two authoritative drug discourses. The first discourse is the dominant one and is eradicative, with blame and punishment as its primary responses. The second discourse is subauthoritative, but growing in importance, and is sanitorial, with care and cure as its primary responses.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhile these two discourses have often been thought of as distinct, this historical exploration demonstrates that the eradicative and sanitorial discourses are both based on similar principles.\n","PeriodicalId":72849,"journal":{"name":"Drugs, habits and social policy","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “public health” approach to illicit drugs: an eradicative drug discourse in a sanitorial disguise?\",\"authors\":\"Steven Debbaut, Tobias Kammersgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dhs-09-2022-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to problematize current calls for a “public health” approach to governing illicit drugs and the people who use them.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIt draws on a range of historical sources to describe how drugs became a problem for governments, in order to critically diagnose the present and investigate the origins of current perspectives on drugs.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nIt is argued that there are currently two authoritative drug discourses. The first discourse is the dominant one and is eradicative, with blame and punishment as its primary responses. The second discourse is subauthoritative, but growing in importance, and is sanitorial, with care and cure as its primary responses.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nWhile these two discourses have often been thought of as distinct, this historical exploration demonstrates that the eradicative and sanitorial discourses are both based on similar principles.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":72849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs, habits and social policy\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs, habits and social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dhs-09-2022-0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs, habits and social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dhs-09-2022-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The “public health” approach to illicit drugs: an eradicative drug discourse in a sanitorial disguise?
Purpose
This study aims to problematize current calls for a “public health” approach to governing illicit drugs and the people who use them.
Design/methodology/approach
It draws on a range of historical sources to describe how drugs became a problem for governments, in order to critically diagnose the present and investigate the origins of current perspectives on drugs.
Findings
It is argued that there are currently two authoritative drug discourses. The first discourse is the dominant one and is eradicative, with blame and punishment as its primary responses. The second discourse is subauthoritative, but growing in importance, and is sanitorial, with care and cure as its primary responses.
Originality/value
While these two discourses have often been thought of as distinct, this historical exploration demonstrates that the eradicative and sanitorial discourses are both based on similar principles.