在《德国国家行动计划》范围内调查暴力侵害妇女行为的普遍程度

C. Hagemann-White
{"title":"在《德国国家行动计划》范围内调查暴力侵害妇女行为的普遍程度","authors":"C. Hagemann-White","doi":"10.3233/SJU-2005-223-410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against a background of three decades of activism and policy in Germany, the first national representative survey of the prevalence of violence against women was completed in 2004. Placed in the context of a National Action plan, this was the first such study explicitly designed for European comparability. It was aimed at improving policy and harmonizing numerous activities towards overcoming violence against women, taking a comprehensive and gender-based view of the problem. The findings point to important patterns related to the risk of violence and its impact; they also confirm that improved methodology on the one hand, awareness-raising on the other increase reporting. While reporting levels as such are not a useful measure for the success of policies, there is a need for more in-depth and comparative analysis to identify strategic points of intervention and ways of moving policy forward. 1. The study of prevalence and the importance of context Gathering data on the prevalence and patterns of gender-based violence is always political, but it can be significant for politics in different ways. This paper will highlight the background and the development of the German national representative survey on violence against women (16). The survey was commissioned in 2002 as part of the National Action Plan to Combat Violence Against Women published by the German government in 1999, and the results published in 2004. In many countries, for example in Canada or France (11,12), representative surveys have been carried out to demonstrate the existence of interpersonal violence in private life, and have been employed to raise awareness and initiate policy. Following Straus and Gelles in the US (18), the focus has often been the family, as for example in the first national survey implemented in 1999 in Spain (19), fuelling debates on how the state ought to intervene to make the family a safe place. By contrast, in Germany, as in the UK and the Netherlands, it was the testimony of victims, made public by the women's movement, that raised awareness - beginning with the International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women in Brussels in 1974, followed by public testimony out of the shelters for battered women. The appropriate response of the state was seen as funding places of safety, support and advocacy for victimized women and their children without regard to their family status (4,8). The role of research in cooperation with services for women was to document and analyse how the violence arose, what its effects were on women and their lives, and what women need to leave a violent situation. By the mid 1990's, there were in Germany - with a population of 81 million - over 400","PeriodicalId":85585,"journal":{"name":"Statistical journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe","volume":"13 1","pages":"301-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surveying prevalence of violence against women in the context of the German National Action Plan\",\"authors\":\"C. Hagemann-White\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/SJU-2005-223-410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Against a background of three decades of activism and policy in Germany, the first national representative survey of the prevalence of violence against women was completed in 2004. Placed in the context of a National Action plan, this was the first such study explicitly designed for European comparability. It was aimed at improving policy and harmonizing numerous activities towards overcoming violence against women, taking a comprehensive and gender-based view of the problem. The findings point to important patterns related to the risk of violence and its impact; they also confirm that improved methodology on the one hand, awareness-raising on the other increase reporting. While reporting levels as such are not a useful measure for the success of policies, there is a need for more in-depth and comparative analysis to identify strategic points of intervention and ways of moving policy forward. 1. The study of prevalence and the importance of context Gathering data on the prevalence and patterns of gender-based violence is always political, but it can be significant for politics in different ways. This paper will highlight the background and the development of the German national representative survey on violence against women (16). The survey was commissioned in 2002 as part of the National Action Plan to Combat Violence Against Women published by the German government in 1999, and the results published in 2004. In many countries, for example in Canada or France (11,12), representative surveys have been carried out to demonstrate the existence of interpersonal violence in private life, and have been employed to raise awareness and initiate policy. Following Straus and Gelles in the US (18), the focus has often been the family, as for example in the first national survey implemented in 1999 in Spain (19), fuelling debates on how the state ought to intervene to make the family a safe place. By contrast, in Germany, as in the UK and the Netherlands, it was the testimony of victims, made public by the women's movement, that raised awareness - beginning with the International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women in Brussels in 1974, followed by public testimony out of the shelters for battered women. The appropriate response of the state was seen as funding places of safety, support and advocacy for victimized women and their children without regard to their family status (4,8). The role of research in cooperation with services for women was to document and analyse how the violence arose, what its effects were on women and their lives, and what women need to leave a violent situation. By the mid 1990's, there were in Germany - with a population of 81 million - over 400\",\"PeriodicalId\":85585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"301-309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/SJU-2005-223-410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SJU-2005-223-410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在德国开展了30年的行动主义和政策的背景下,2004年完成了关于暴力侵害妇女行为普遍程度的第一次全国代表性调查。在国家行动计划的背景下,这是第一个明确为欧洲可比性而设计的此类研究。它的目的是改进政策和协调许多活动,以克服对妇女的暴力行为,对这个问题采取全面和基于性别的观点。调查结果指出了与暴力风险及其影响有关的重要模式;他们还证实,一方面改进了方法,另一方面提高了认识,增加了报告。虽然报告数量本身并不是衡量政策成功与否的有用指标,但有必要进行更深入的比较分析,以确定干预的战略要点和推动政策的方式。1. 收集关于基于性别的暴力的普遍程度和模式的数据始终是政治性的,但它可以以不同的方式对政治具有重要意义。本文将重点介绍关于对妇女的暴力行为的德国全国代表性调查的背景和发展(16)。这项调查是2002年委托进行的,是德国政府1999年公布的《打击暴力侵害妇女行为国家行动计划》的一部分,调查结果于2004年公布。在许多国家,例如在加拿大或法国(11,12),进行了有代表性的调查,以证明私人生活中存在人际暴力,并已被用来提高认识和启动政策。继美国的Straus和Gelles之后(18),关注的焦点往往是家庭,例如1999年在西班牙实施的第一次全国调查(19),引发了关于国家应该如何干预以使家庭成为一个安全场所的辩论。相比之下,在德国,就像在英国和荷兰一样,是妇女运动公开了受害者的证词,才提高了人们的认识——从1974年布鲁塞尔针对妇女犯罪的国际法庭开始,然后是受虐妇女收容所的公开证词。人们认为,国家的适当反应是为受害妇女及其子女提供安全、支持和倡导的场所,而不考虑其家庭地位(4,8)。与妇女服务机构合作进行的研究的作用是记录和分析暴力是如何产生的,它对妇女及其生活的影响,以及妇女需要什么才能摆脱暴力状况。到20世纪90年代中期,拥有8100万人口的德国有超过400家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surveying prevalence of violence against women in the context of the German National Action Plan
Against a background of three decades of activism and policy in Germany, the first national representative survey of the prevalence of violence against women was completed in 2004. Placed in the context of a National Action plan, this was the first such study explicitly designed for European comparability. It was aimed at improving policy and harmonizing numerous activities towards overcoming violence against women, taking a comprehensive and gender-based view of the problem. The findings point to important patterns related to the risk of violence and its impact; they also confirm that improved methodology on the one hand, awareness-raising on the other increase reporting. While reporting levels as such are not a useful measure for the success of policies, there is a need for more in-depth and comparative analysis to identify strategic points of intervention and ways of moving policy forward. 1. The study of prevalence and the importance of context Gathering data on the prevalence and patterns of gender-based violence is always political, but it can be significant for politics in different ways. This paper will highlight the background and the development of the German national representative survey on violence against women (16). The survey was commissioned in 2002 as part of the National Action Plan to Combat Violence Against Women published by the German government in 1999, and the results published in 2004. In many countries, for example in Canada or France (11,12), representative surveys have been carried out to demonstrate the existence of interpersonal violence in private life, and have been employed to raise awareness and initiate policy. Following Straus and Gelles in the US (18), the focus has often been the family, as for example in the first national survey implemented in 1999 in Spain (19), fuelling debates on how the state ought to intervene to make the family a safe place. By contrast, in Germany, as in the UK and the Netherlands, it was the testimony of victims, made public by the women's movement, that raised awareness - beginning with the International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women in Brussels in 1974, followed by public testimony out of the shelters for battered women. The appropriate response of the state was seen as funding places of safety, support and advocacy for victimized women and their children without regard to their family status (4,8). The role of research in cooperation with services for women was to document and analyse how the violence arose, what its effects were on women and their lives, and what women need to leave a violent situation. By the mid 1990's, there were in Germany - with a population of 81 million - over 400
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信