哈萨克斯坦阿克苏-扎巴格利自然保护区社区生态旅游发展的可持续性

IF 0.7 Q2 AREA STUDIES
I. Akbar, Sergeyeva Aigul Maksatovna, Myrzaliyeva Zabira Kazbekkyzy, Tazhekova Akmaral Zhaksybekkyzy, Saulembaev Altynbai Tagabayevich, Mominov Serik Abdukarimovich
{"title":"哈萨克斯坦阿克苏-扎巴格利自然保护区社区生态旅游发展的可持续性","authors":"I. Akbar, Sergeyeva Aigul Maksatovna, Myrzaliyeva Zabira Kazbekkyzy, Tazhekova Akmaral Zhaksybekkyzy, Saulembaev Altynbai Tagabayevich, Mominov Serik Abdukarimovich","doi":"10.18335/region.v9i1.335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of community-based ecotourism (CBE) has the potential to preserve biodiversity and protect the environment, as well as play an important role in the socio-cultural, economic and politically sustainable development of the community. This paper assesses the implementation of CBE development and compares the sustainability of ecotourism development between the Zhabagly community and the Abaiyl community. The data is obtained mainly through the household questionnaire survey, field observations, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. 222 representative families were surveyed with 5-point Likert scale questions in this paper including 166 Zhabagly and 56 Abaiyl participants. The study used 18 indicators based on 4 dimensions: environmental, socio-cultural, economic and political. Results from this analysis indicate that the sustainability of CBE development in two communities is slightly different in all 4 dimensions. Zhabagly community is more successful in achieving sustainable CBE development than the Abaiyl community. The results reveal that the overall evaluation of the two communities on sustainability is moderate. However, both communities demonstrate that, potentially, they are politically unsustainable. As a result, we initially assert that the sustainability of CBE development in the Aksu-Zhabagly nature reserve (NR) is far from perfect. In particular, the positive economic and political impact of tourism development is not obvious. To address this shortcoming, tourism development organizations need to jointly develop a design policy for the sustainable development of CBE.","PeriodicalId":43257,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Region","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability of the community-based ecotourism development in the Aksu-Zhabagly nature reserve, Kazakhstan\",\"authors\":\"I. Akbar, Sergeyeva Aigul Maksatovna, Myrzaliyeva Zabira Kazbekkyzy, Tazhekova Akmaral Zhaksybekkyzy, Saulembaev Altynbai Tagabayevich, Mominov Serik Abdukarimovich\",\"doi\":\"10.18335/region.v9i1.335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of community-based ecotourism (CBE) has the potential to preserve biodiversity and protect the environment, as well as play an important role in the socio-cultural, economic and politically sustainable development of the community. This paper assesses the implementation of CBE development and compares the sustainability of ecotourism development between the Zhabagly community and the Abaiyl community. The data is obtained mainly through the household questionnaire survey, field observations, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. 222 representative families were surveyed with 5-point Likert scale questions in this paper including 166 Zhabagly and 56 Abaiyl participants. The study used 18 indicators based on 4 dimensions: environmental, socio-cultural, economic and political. Results from this analysis indicate that the sustainability of CBE development in two communities is slightly different in all 4 dimensions. Zhabagly community is more successful in achieving sustainable CBE development than the Abaiyl community. The results reveal that the overall evaluation of the two communities on sustainability is moderate. However, both communities demonstrate that, potentially, they are politically unsustainable. As a result, we initially assert that the sustainability of CBE development in the Aksu-Zhabagly nature reserve (NR) is far from perfect. In particular, the positive economic and political impact of tourism development is not obvious. To address this shortcoming, tourism development organizations need to jointly develop a design policy for the sustainable development of CBE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Region\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Region\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v9i1.335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v9i1.335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

以社区为基础的生态旅游的发展具有保护生物多样性和保护环境的潜力,并在社区的社会文化、经济和政治可持续发展中发挥重要作用。本文评估了CBE开发的实施情况,并比较了扎巴格利社区和阿拜里尔社区生态旅游发展的可持续性。数据主要通过入户问卷调查、实地观察、深度访谈和焦点小组讨论等方式获得。采用5点李克特量表对222个具有代表性的家庭进行问卷调查,其中Zhabagly家庭166人,Abaiyl家庭56人。该研究基于环境、社会文化、经济和政治四个方面使用了18个指标。分析结果表明,两个社区CBE发展的可持续性在所有4个维度上都略有差异。Zhabagly社区在实现可持续的CBE发展方面比Abaiyl社区更成功。结果表明,两个群落的可持续性总体评价为中等。然而,这两个群体都表明,它们在政治上可能是不可持续的。因此,我们初步认为阿克苏-扎巴格利自然保护区生物多样性开发的可持续性还远远不够完善。特别是,旅游发展对经济和政治的积极影响并不明显。为了解决这一问题,旅游开发组织需要共同制定一项可持续发展的CBE设计政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability of the community-based ecotourism development in the Aksu-Zhabagly nature reserve, Kazakhstan
The development of community-based ecotourism (CBE) has the potential to preserve biodiversity and protect the environment, as well as play an important role in the socio-cultural, economic and politically sustainable development of the community. This paper assesses the implementation of CBE development and compares the sustainability of ecotourism development between the Zhabagly community and the Abaiyl community. The data is obtained mainly through the household questionnaire survey, field observations, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. 222 representative families were surveyed with 5-point Likert scale questions in this paper including 166 Zhabagly and 56 Abaiyl participants. The study used 18 indicators based on 4 dimensions: environmental, socio-cultural, economic and political. Results from this analysis indicate that the sustainability of CBE development in two communities is slightly different in all 4 dimensions. Zhabagly community is more successful in achieving sustainable CBE development than the Abaiyl community. The results reveal that the overall evaluation of the two communities on sustainability is moderate. However, both communities demonstrate that, potentially, they are politically unsustainable. As a result, we initially assert that the sustainability of CBE development in the Aksu-Zhabagly nature reserve (NR) is far from perfect. In particular, the positive economic and political impact of tourism development is not obvious. To address this shortcoming, tourism development organizations need to jointly develop a design policy for the sustainable development of CBE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Baltic Region
Baltic Region AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
37.50%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信