根治性前列腺切除术和淋巴结清扫患者淋巴结阳性检测的预测因素

V. Muñoz Guillermo, A. Rosino Sánchez, A. Pardo Martínez, I. Barceló Bayonas, C. Carrillo George, T. Fernández Aparicio
{"title":"根治性前列腺切除术和淋巴结清扫患者淋巴结阳性检测的预测因素","authors":"V. Muñoz Guillermo, A. Rosino Sánchez, A. Pardo Martínez, I. Barceló Bayonas, C. Carrillo George, T. Fernández Aparicio","doi":"10.3390/lymphatics1010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The detection of positive lymph nodes after a lymph node dissection changes the clinical prognosis; therefore, we evaluated what factors help us predict the presence of positive lymph nodes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all radical prostatectomies and extended lymph node dissection performed from January 2010 to October 2018 in our centre was conducted. The variables included in the Briganti nomogram (preoperative PSA, Gleason biopsy, percentage of cores, and clinical stage) were considered, as well as perineural invasion and involvement of the seminal vesicles in the prostate biopsy; Results: A total of 110 lymph node dissections are obtained. Patient mean age is 64.18 years (46.55–75.91). Of the 110 lymphadenectomies performed, 16 patients (14.5%) presented positive nodes. Presenting infiltrated seminal vesicles, perineural invasion, higher PSA, higher clinical stage, higher Gleason biopsy and percentage of cores is more likely to have statistically significant lymph node involvement (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, the percentage of positive core, together with the involvement of the seminal vesicles and Gleason ≥ 4 in the majority are predictor factors for positive nodes (p < 0.01); Conclusions: The percentage of positive cores, the involvement of the seminal vesicles, and the majority Gleason ≥ 4 are independent predictors of lymph node involvement in prostate cancer.","PeriodicalId":18718,"journal":{"name":"Microcirculation, endothelium, and lymphatics","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictor Factors for the Detection of Positive Nodes in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Lymph Node Dissection\",\"authors\":\"V. Muñoz Guillermo, A. Rosino Sánchez, A. Pardo Martínez, I. Barceló Bayonas, C. Carrillo George, T. Fernández Aparicio\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/lymphatics1010003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The detection of positive lymph nodes after a lymph node dissection changes the clinical prognosis; therefore, we evaluated what factors help us predict the presence of positive lymph nodes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all radical prostatectomies and extended lymph node dissection performed from January 2010 to October 2018 in our centre was conducted. The variables included in the Briganti nomogram (preoperative PSA, Gleason biopsy, percentage of cores, and clinical stage) were considered, as well as perineural invasion and involvement of the seminal vesicles in the prostate biopsy; Results: A total of 110 lymph node dissections are obtained. Patient mean age is 64.18 years (46.55–75.91). Of the 110 lymphadenectomies performed, 16 patients (14.5%) presented positive nodes. Presenting infiltrated seminal vesicles, perineural invasion, higher PSA, higher clinical stage, higher Gleason biopsy and percentage of cores is more likely to have statistically significant lymph node involvement (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, the percentage of positive core, together with the involvement of the seminal vesicles and Gleason ≥ 4 in the majority are predictor factors for positive nodes (p < 0.01); Conclusions: The percentage of positive cores, the involvement of the seminal vesicles, and the majority Gleason ≥ 4 are independent predictors of lymph node involvement in prostate cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microcirculation, endothelium, and lymphatics\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microcirculation, endothelium, and lymphatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/lymphatics1010003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microcirculation, endothelium, and lymphatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/lymphatics1010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:淋巴结清扫后阳性淋巴结的发现改变了临床预后;因此,我们评估了哪些因素可以帮助我们预测阳性淋巴结的存在。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2018年10月在我中心进行的所有根治性前列腺切除术和扩大淋巴结清扫手术。包括Briganti nomogram(术前PSA, Gleason活检,核的百分比,临床分期)的变量,以及前列腺活检中对神经周围的侵犯和精囊的累及;结果:共获得110例淋巴结清扫。患者平均年龄为64.18岁(46.55 ~ 75.91)。在110例淋巴结切除术中,16例(14.5%)出现淋巴结阳性。精囊浸润、神经周围浸润、PSA升高、临床分期升高、Gleason活检及核部比例升高的患者淋巴结受累的可能性更大(p < 0.05)。多因素分析中,核心阳性百分率、精囊受累程度和Gleason≥4为淋巴结阳性的预测因素(p < 0.01);结论:核核阳性百分比、精囊受累程度和大多数Gleason≥4是前列腺癌淋巴结受累的独立预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictor Factors for the Detection of Positive Nodes in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Lymph Node Dissection
Background: The detection of positive lymph nodes after a lymph node dissection changes the clinical prognosis; therefore, we evaluated what factors help us predict the presence of positive lymph nodes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all radical prostatectomies and extended lymph node dissection performed from January 2010 to October 2018 in our centre was conducted. The variables included in the Briganti nomogram (preoperative PSA, Gleason biopsy, percentage of cores, and clinical stage) were considered, as well as perineural invasion and involvement of the seminal vesicles in the prostate biopsy; Results: A total of 110 lymph node dissections are obtained. Patient mean age is 64.18 years (46.55–75.91). Of the 110 lymphadenectomies performed, 16 patients (14.5%) presented positive nodes. Presenting infiltrated seminal vesicles, perineural invasion, higher PSA, higher clinical stage, higher Gleason biopsy and percentage of cores is more likely to have statistically significant lymph node involvement (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, the percentage of positive core, together with the involvement of the seminal vesicles and Gleason ≥ 4 in the majority are predictor factors for positive nodes (p < 0.01); Conclusions: The percentage of positive cores, the involvement of the seminal vesicles, and the majority Gleason ≥ 4 are independent predictors of lymph node involvement in prostate cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信