膝关节骨关节炎的骨形态差异

A. Siddiqi, H. Anis, I. Borukhov, N. Piuzzi
{"title":"膝关节骨关节炎的骨形态差异","authors":"A. Siddiqi, H. Anis, I. Borukhov, N. Piuzzi","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.21.00892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Improved understanding of the morphological characteristics of knees with osteoarthritis (OA) and various deformities can enable personalized implant positioning and balancing in total knee arthroplasty in an effort to continue improving clinical outcomes and optimizing procedural value. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to outline morphological differences in the medial and lateral distal femur and proximal tibia associated with varus and valgus deformities in knee OA. Methods: A large computed tomography (CT) database was used to identify 1,158 knees, which were divided into normal and osteoarthritic groups; the latter was further divided on the basis of deformity into neutral, varus, and valgus subgroups. Morphological measurements included the non-weight-bearing hip-knee-ankle angle (nwHKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), rotation of the posterior condylar axis (PCA) relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), ratio of medial to lateral posterior condylar offset, ratio of medial to lateral condylar radius, medial posterior slope (MPS), lateral posterior slope (LPS), medial coronal slope (MCS), and lateral coronal slope (LCS). Results: Compared with the normal group, the OA group was in overall varus (nwHKA, −2.2° ± 5.0° compared with −0.2° ± 2.4°) and had a significantly smaller MPS (8.4° ± 4.0° compared with 9.2° ± 4.0°), larger LPS (9.2° ± 3.6° compared with 7.2° ± 3.3°), and smaller MCS (82.1° ± 4.3° compared with 83.9° ± 3.3°). Differences among the OA subgroups were also observed for the MCS and LCS. Compared with the normal group, the sTEA of the OA group was less externally rotated relative to the PCA (0.3° ± 1.5° compared with 1.2° ± 1.9°), and both the condylar offset ratio (1.01 ± 0.06 compared with 1.04 ± 0.07) and the condylar radius ratio (0.98 ± 0.07 compared with 1.03 ± 0.07) were smaller. Only the condylar radius ratio showed differences among the OA subgroups, with valgus deformity associated with a larger ratio. Conclusions: An analysis of CT scans of 965 healthy and 193 osteoarthritic knees revealed significant differences in PCA, condylar offset, and condylar radius as well as tibial slope in both the sagittal and coronal planes. Clinical Relevance: There is a strong need to evolve toward a more personalized treatment for osteoarthritic knees that utilizes implants and technology to help tailor total knee arthroplasty on the basis of the patient’s morphologic characteristics.","PeriodicalId":22579,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":"805 - 812"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osseous Morphological Differences in Knee Osteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"A. Siddiqi, H. Anis, I. Borukhov, N. Piuzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.21.00892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Improved understanding of the morphological characteristics of knees with osteoarthritis (OA) and various deformities can enable personalized implant positioning and balancing in total knee arthroplasty in an effort to continue improving clinical outcomes and optimizing procedural value. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to outline morphological differences in the medial and lateral distal femur and proximal tibia associated with varus and valgus deformities in knee OA. Methods: A large computed tomography (CT) database was used to identify 1,158 knees, which were divided into normal and osteoarthritic groups; the latter was further divided on the basis of deformity into neutral, varus, and valgus subgroups. Morphological measurements included the non-weight-bearing hip-knee-ankle angle (nwHKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), rotation of the posterior condylar axis (PCA) relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), ratio of medial to lateral posterior condylar offset, ratio of medial to lateral condylar radius, medial posterior slope (MPS), lateral posterior slope (LPS), medial coronal slope (MCS), and lateral coronal slope (LCS). Results: Compared with the normal group, the OA group was in overall varus (nwHKA, −2.2° ± 5.0° compared with −0.2° ± 2.4°) and had a significantly smaller MPS (8.4° ± 4.0° compared with 9.2° ± 4.0°), larger LPS (9.2° ± 3.6° compared with 7.2° ± 3.3°), and smaller MCS (82.1° ± 4.3° compared with 83.9° ± 3.3°). Differences among the OA subgroups were also observed for the MCS and LCS. Compared with the normal group, the sTEA of the OA group was less externally rotated relative to the PCA (0.3° ± 1.5° compared with 1.2° ± 1.9°), and both the condylar offset ratio (1.01 ± 0.06 compared with 1.04 ± 0.07) and the condylar radius ratio (0.98 ± 0.07 compared with 1.03 ± 0.07) were smaller. Only the condylar radius ratio showed differences among the OA subgroups, with valgus deformity associated with a larger ratio. Conclusions: An analysis of CT scans of 965 healthy and 193 osteoarthritic knees revealed significant differences in PCA, condylar offset, and condylar radius as well as tibial slope in both the sagittal and coronal planes. Clinical Relevance: There is a strong need to evolve toward a more personalized treatment for osteoarthritic knees that utilizes implants and technology to help tailor total knee arthroplasty on the basis of the patient’s morphologic characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"805 - 812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:更好地了解骨关节炎(OA)和各种畸形膝关节的形态特征,可以在全膝关节置换术中实现个性化的植入物定位和平衡,以继续改善临床结果和优化手术价值。因此,本研究的目的是概述与膝OA内翻和外翻畸形相关的股骨远端和胫骨近端内侧和外侧的形态学差异。方法:利用大型计算机断层扫描(CT)数据库对1158例膝关节进行识别,将其分为正常组和骨关节炎组;后者根据畸形进一步分为中性、内翻和外翻亚组。形态学测量包括非负重髋膝踝角(nwHKA)、机械股骨外侧远端角(mLDFA)、胫骨内侧近端角(MPTA)、后髁轴(PCA)相对于手术经髁轴(sTEA)的旋转、后髁内侧与外侧偏移比、内外侧髁半径比、后内侧斜度(MPS)、后外侧斜度(LPS)、冠状内侧斜度(MCS)和冠状外侧斜度(LCS)。结果:与正常组相比,OA组整体内翻(nwHKA为- 2.2°±5.0°,与- 0.2°±2.4°相比),MPS明显较小(8.4°±4.0°,与9.2°±4.0°相比),LPS较大(9.2°±3.6°,与7.2°±3.3°相比),MCS较小(82.1°±4.3°,与83.9°±3.3°相比)。OA亚组间MCS和LCS的差异也被观察到。与正常组相比,OA组的sTEA相对于PCA的外旋较小(0.3°±1.5°比1.2°±1.9°),髁偏置比(1.01±0.06比1.04±0.07)和髁半径比(0.98±0.07比1.03±0.07)均较小。在OA亚组中,只有髁突桡骨的比值有差异,外翻畸形的比值较大。结论:通过对965例健康膝关节和193例骨性关节炎膝关节的CT扫描分析发现,在矢状面和冠状面,PCA、髁突偏移、髁突半径和胫骨斜率均存在显著差异。临床相关性:对于骨关节炎膝关节,迫切需要发展一种更加个性化的治疗方法,利用植入物和技术根据患者的形态特征来帮助定制全膝关节置换术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Osseous Morphological Differences in Knee Osteoarthritis
Background: Improved understanding of the morphological characteristics of knees with osteoarthritis (OA) and various deformities can enable personalized implant positioning and balancing in total knee arthroplasty in an effort to continue improving clinical outcomes and optimizing procedural value. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to outline morphological differences in the medial and lateral distal femur and proximal tibia associated with varus and valgus deformities in knee OA. Methods: A large computed tomography (CT) database was used to identify 1,158 knees, which were divided into normal and osteoarthritic groups; the latter was further divided on the basis of deformity into neutral, varus, and valgus subgroups. Morphological measurements included the non-weight-bearing hip-knee-ankle angle (nwHKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), rotation of the posterior condylar axis (PCA) relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), ratio of medial to lateral posterior condylar offset, ratio of medial to lateral condylar radius, medial posterior slope (MPS), lateral posterior slope (LPS), medial coronal slope (MCS), and lateral coronal slope (LCS). Results: Compared with the normal group, the OA group was in overall varus (nwHKA, −2.2° ± 5.0° compared with −0.2° ± 2.4°) and had a significantly smaller MPS (8.4° ± 4.0° compared with 9.2° ± 4.0°), larger LPS (9.2° ± 3.6° compared with 7.2° ± 3.3°), and smaller MCS (82.1° ± 4.3° compared with 83.9° ± 3.3°). Differences among the OA subgroups were also observed for the MCS and LCS. Compared with the normal group, the sTEA of the OA group was less externally rotated relative to the PCA (0.3° ± 1.5° compared with 1.2° ± 1.9°), and both the condylar offset ratio (1.01 ± 0.06 compared with 1.04 ± 0.07) and the condylar radius ratio (0.98 ± 0.07 compared with 1.03 ± 0.07) were smaller. Only the condylar radius ratio showed differences among the OA subgroups, with valgus deformity associated with a larger ratio. Conclusions: An analysis of CT scans of 965 healthy and 193 osteoarthritic knees revealed significant differences in PCA, condylar offset, and condylar radius as well as tibial slope in both the sagittal and coronal planes. Clinical Relevance: There is a strong need to evolve toward a more personalized treatment for osteoarthritic knees that utilizes implants and technology to help tailor total knee arthroplasty on the basis of the patient’s morphologic characteristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信