列奥纳多·波罗放弃精神极限作为一种方法和哲学的统一

Q2 Arts and Humanities
José R. Murillo Gómez
{"title":"列奥纳多·波罗放弃精神极限作为一种方法和哲学的统一","authors":"José R. Murillo Gómez","doi":"10.15581/013.21.123-139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolLa filosofia aspira a un saber unitario, pero la filosofia de Polo renuncia a detenerse en una unidad objetiva. Las diversas dimensiones del abandono del limite mental abren temas diversos, que ninguna de ellas parece poder abarcar en su conjunto. En este articulo se plantea en que sentido el metodo de Polo puede ofrecer una vision unitaria del saber, tomando pie en dos aspectos comunes a todas sus dimensiones: la presencia mental y la referencia a Dios. EnglishPhilosophy aspires to a unitary knowledge, but the philosophy of Polo renounces to an objective unity. The different dimensions of the abandonment of the mental limit open up diverse themes, but none of those dimensions seems to be able to understand all of them together as a unity. In this article, I ask in what sense Polo’s method can offer a unitary vision of knowledge, relying on what is common in all its dimensions: the mental presence and the reference to God.","PeriodicalId":37838,"journal":{"name":"Studia Poliana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El abandono del límite mental como método y la unidad de la filosofía en Leonardo Polo\",\"authors\":\"José R. Murillo Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.15581/013.21.123-139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolLa filosofia aspira a un saber unitario, pero la filosofia de Polo renuncia a detenerse en una unidad objetiva. Las diversas dimensiones del abandono del limite mental abren temas diversos, que ninguna de ellas parece poder abarcar en su conjunto. En este articulo se plantea en que sentido el metodo de Polo puede ofrecer una vision unitaria del saber, tomando pie en dos aspectos comunes a todas sus dimensiones: la presencia mental y la referencia a Dios. EnglishPhilosophy aspires to a unitary knowledge, but the philosophy of Polo renounces to an objective unity. The different dimensions of the abandonment of the mental limit open up diverse themes, but none of those dimensions seems to be able to understand all of them together as a unity. In this article, I ask in what sense Polo’s method can offer a unitary vision of knowledge, relying on what is common in all its dimensions: the mental presence and the reference to God.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Poliana\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Poliana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15581/013.21.123-139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Poliana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15581/013.21.123-139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

西班牙哲学追求统一的知识,但波罗的哲学拒绝停留在客观的统一上。放弃精神极限的不同维度开启了不同的主题,而这些主题似乎都无法全部涵盖。在这篇文章中,我们讨论了Polo方法如何提供一个统一的知识视野,基于两个共同的方面,所有的维度:精神存在和对上帝的参考。EnglishPhilosophy aspires to a unitary knowledge, but the philosophy of Polo renounces to an目标unity。The不同of抛弃of The精神维度限制open up的不同组件,but none of那些人似乎都在维度能够to去理解all of them as a团结在一起。在这篇文章中,我想问的是,在什么意义上,波罗的方法可以提供一个统一的知识愿景,在所有维度上都是共同的:精神的存在和对上帝的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El abandono del límite mental como método y la unidad de la filosofía en Leonardo Polo
espanolLa filosofia aspira a un saber unitario, pero la filosofia de Polo renuncia a detenerse en una unidad objetiva. Las diversas dimensiones del abandono del limite mental abren temas diversos, que ninguna de ellas parece poder abarcar en su conjunto. En este articulo se plantea en que sentido el metodo de Polo puede ofrecer una vision unitaria del saber, tomando pie en dos aspectos comunes a todas sus dimensiones: la presencia mental y la referencia a Dios. EnglishPhilosophy aspires to a unitary knowledge, but the philosophy of Polo renounces to an objective unity. The different dimensions of the abandonment of the mental limit open up diverse themes, but none of those dimensions seems to be able to understand all of them together as a unity. In this article, I ask in what sense Polo’s method can offer a unitary vision of knowledge, relying on what is common in all its dimensions: the mental presence and the reference to God.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Poliana
Studia Poliana Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Studia Poliana is a journal of the Departament of Philosophy of the University of Navarra. It is annually published, each february. The journal aims to invite researchers to cooperate towards the big topics of contemporary philosophy. Studia Poliana focusses on the philosophical proposal of Leonardo Polo. Our principal aim is to publish articles that are models of interdisciplinary work and scientific accuracy allowing the readers to keep abreast of the central issues and problems of anthropology, metaphysicis, and theory of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信