道德思考与政府政策:人类胚胎学沃诺克委员会。

M. Warnock
{"title":"道德思考与政府政策:人类胚胎学沃诺克委员会。","authors":"M. Warnock","doi":"10.2307/3349845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A parliamentary committee of inquiry was convened in response to growing concern--among the general public and the scientific community--about new techniques in human fertilization and research in embryology. The committee had to enter that jurisprudential minefield, the theoretical relation between morality and the law. When issues arise in which there is no historical tradition, the voice of morality may be genuinely confused and uncertain. But the law, unlike moral opinion, cannot be contradictory; it must be definite, unambiguous, and universally applicable.","PeriodicalId":76697,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society","volume":"65 1","pages":"504-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.\",\"authors\":\"M. Warnock\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3349845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A parliamentary committee of inquiry was convened in response to growing concern--among the general public and the scientific community--about new techniques in human fertilization and research in embryology. The committee had to enter that jurisprudential minefield, the theoretical relation between morality and the law. When issues arise in which there is no historical tradition, the voice of morality may be genuinely confused and uncertain. But the law, unlike moral opinion, cannot be contradictory; it must be definite, unambiguous, and universally applicable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"504-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3349845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3349845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

英国议会成立了一个调查委员会,以回应公众和科学界对人类受精和胚胎学研究新技术日益增长的担忧。委员会必须进入法理学的雷区,即道德与法律之间的理论关系。当没有历史传统的问题出现时,道德的声音可能真的是混乱和不确定的。但是法律,不像道德观念,不能是矛盾的;它必须是明确的、明确的、普遍适用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.
A parliamentary committee of inquiry was convened in response to growing concern--among the general public and the scientific community--about new techniques in human fertilization and research in embryology. The committee had to enter that jurisprudential minefield, the theoretical relation between morality and the law. When issues arise in which there is no historical tradition, the voice of morality may be genuinely confused and uncertain. But the law, unlike moral opinion, cannot be contradictory; it must be definite, unambiguous, and universally applicable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信