响应静态分析工具警报的挑战

Nasif Imtiaz, A. Rahman, Effat Farhana, L. Williams
{"title":"响应静态分析工具警报的挑战","authors":"Nasif Imtiaz, A. Rahman, Effat Farhana, L. Williams","doi":"10.1109/MSR.2019.00049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Static analysis tool alerts can help developers detect potential defects in the code early in the development cycle. However, developers are not always able to respond to the alerts with their preferred action and may turn away from using the tool. In this paper, we qualitatively analyze 280 Stack Overflow (SO) questions regarding static analysis tool alerts to identify the challenges developers face in understanding and responding to these alerts. We find that the most prevalent question on SO is how to ignore and filter alerts, followed by validation of false positives. Our findings confirm prior researchers' findings related to notification communication theory as 44.6% of the SO questions that we analyzed indicate developers face communication challenges.","PeriodicalId":6706,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"55 1","pages":"245-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges with Responding to Static Analysis Tool Alerts\",\"authors\":\"Nasif Imtiaz, A. Rahman, Effat Farhana, L. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MSR.2019.00049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Static analysis tool alerts can help developers detect potential defects in the code early in the development cycle. However, developers are not always able to respond to the alerts with their preferred action and may turn away from using the tool. In this paper, we qualitatively analyze 280 Stack Overflow (SO) questions regarding static analysis tool alerts to identify the challenges developers face in understanding and responding to these alerts. We find that the most prevalent question on SO is how to ignore and filter alerts, followed by validation of false positives. Our findings confirm prior researchers' findings related to notification communication theory as 44.6% of the SO questions that we analyzed indicate developers face communication challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"245-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2019.00049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2019.00049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

静态分析工具警报可以帮助开发人员在开发周期的早期检测代码中的潜在缺陷。然而,开发人员并不总是能够用他们喜欢的操作来响应警报,并且可能会放弃使用该工具。在本文中,我们定性分析了280个关于静态分析工具警报的堆栈溢出(SO)问题,以确定开发人员在理解和响应这些警报时面临的挑战。我们发现SO中最普遍的问题是如何忽略和过滤警报,其次是假阳性的验证。我们的发现证实了之前研究人员关于通知沟通理论的发现,我们分析的44.6%的SO问题表明开发者面临沟通挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges with Responding to Static Analysis Tool Alerts
Static analysis tool alerts can help developers detect potential defects in the code early in the development cycle. However, developers are not always able to respond to the alerts with their preferred action and may turn away from using the tool. In this paper, we qualitatively analyze 280 Stack Overflow (SO) questions regarding static analysis tool alerts to identify the challenges developers face in understanding and responding to these alerts. We find that the most prevalent question on SO is how to ignore and filter alerts, followed by validation of false positives. Our findings confirm prior researchers' findings related to notification communication theory as 44.6% of the SO questions that we analyzed indicate developers face communication challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信