开发和评价经济水生产力评估工具(Eco-Wp Tool)

A. Khalil, M. Ibrahim, H. Abdelmageed
{"title":"开发和评价经济水生产力评估工具(Eco-Wp Tool)","authors":"A. Khalil, M. Ibrahim, H. Abdelmageed","doi":"10.21608/jssae.2022.146511.1086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The substance of worldwide water scarcity is the geographic and temporal inconsistency among freshwater demand ,water resource availability and the un-efficient use of water resources . Water footprint (WFP) and economic water productivity are considered a solution to global water stress and water scarcity. This study aims to develop a tool of the assessment of the economic water productivity (Eco-WP) and evaluate different methods of water productivity (WP) and their relationship with WFP . The WFP and Eco-WP were estimated in year 2017 for the major crops in Egypt. The results showed that there were two analyzes for Eco-WP: first, analysis per crop, the average of Crop Water Productivity was taken for each crop to compare crop's water productivity for overall Egypt. Second, analysis per governorate, the average governorate Water Productivity for all crops planted in this governorate. Also, the relationship between Eco-WP and WFP was a reverse relationship (power equation). For the first analysis, the most suitable method to judge Eco-WP was the Energy Price Method with 0.98 (R 2 ). However, the appropriate method to assess Eco-WP was the net revenue method with 0.56 (R 2 ).","PeriodicalId":17094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and Evaluating a Tool for Assessment Economic Water Productivity (Eco-Wp Tool)\",\"authors\":\"A. Khalil, M. Ibrahim, H. Abdelmageed\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/jssae.2022.146511.1086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The substance of worldwide water scarcity is the geographic and temporal inconsistency among freshwater demand ,water resource availability and the un-efficient use of water resources . Water footprint (WFP) and economic water productivity are considered a solution to global water stress and water scarcity. This study aims to develop a tool of the assessment of the economic water productivity (Eco-WP) and evaluate different methods of water productivity (WP) and their relationship with WFP . The WFP and Eco-WP were estimated in year 2017 for the major crops in Egypt. The results showed that there were two analyzes for Eco-WP: first, analysis per crop, the average of Crop Water Productivity was taken for each crop to compare crop's water productivity for overall Egypt. Second, analysis per governorate, the average governorate Water Productivity for all crops planted in this governorate. Also, the relationship between Eco-WP and WFP was a reverse relationship (power equation). For the first analysis, the most suitable method to judge Eco-WP was the Energy Price Method with 0.98 (R 2 ). However, the appropriate method to assess Eco-WP was the net revenue method with 0.56 (R 2 ).\",\"PeriodicalId\":17094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2022.146511.1086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2022.146511.1086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球水资源短缺的实质是淡水需求、水资源可得性和水资源利用效率低下之间的地理和时间上的不一致。水足迹(世界粮食计划署)和经济水生产力被认为是解决全球水资源压力和水资源短缺的办法。本研究旨在开发一种评估经济水生产力(Eco-WP)的工具,并评估不同的水生产力(WP)方法及其与世界粮食计划署的关系。2017年,世界粮食计划署和Eco-WP对埃及的主要作物进行了评估。结果表明,Eco-WP有两个分析:第一,对每一种作物进行分析,取每种作物的平均作物水分生产力,以比较埃及整体作物的水分生产力。其次,每个省的分析,该省种植的所有作物的平均省水生产力。此外,Eco-WP和WFP之间的关系是反向关系(功率方程)。在第一次分析中,最适合评判Eco-WP的方法是能源价格法,其结果为0.98 (r2)。然而,评估Eco-WP的合适方法是净收益法,其系数为0.56 (r2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing and Evaluating a Tool for Assessment Economic Water Productivity (Eco-Wp Tool)
The substance of worldwide water scarcity is the geographic and temporal inconsistency among freshwater demand ,water resource availability and the un-efficient use of water resources . Water footprint (WFP) and economic water productivity are considered a solution to global water stress and water scarcity. This study aims to develop a tool of the assessment of the economic water productivity (Eco-WP) and evaluate different methods of water productivity (WP) and their relationship with WFP . The WFP and Eco-WP were estimated in year 2017 for the major crops in Egypt. The results showed that there were two analyzes for Eco-WP: first, analysis per crop, the average of Crop Water Productivity was taken for each crop to compare crop's water productivity for overall Egypt. Second, analysis per governorate, the average governorate Water Productivity for all crops planted in this governorate. Also, the relationship between Eco-WP and WFP was a reverse relationship (power equation). For the first analysis, the most suitable method to judge Eco-WP was the Energy Price Method with 0.98 (R 2 ). However, the appropriate method to assess Eco-WP was the net revenue method with 0.56 (R 2 ).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信