仲裁协议当事人履行的可能性与限制与意愿自治原则:当前趋势

К. A. Golubenko, E. Voskresenskaya
{"title":"仲裁协议当事人履行的可能性与限制与意愿自治原则:当前趋势","authors":"К. A. Golubenko, E. Voskresenskaya","doi":"10.35854/2219-6242-2021-1-88-93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the principle of the autonomy of the will, which is fundamental in the regulation of the settlement of disputes arising from the foreign economic relations of the parties. The most important principle under consideration, in particular, allows the parties to decide which law will be applied to regulate their relationship and which court or arbitration will be given the competence to resolve their disputes. The authors note the tendency of the legislative sphere and law enforcement practice to give the parties as much freedom as possible when concluding and implementing the terms of an arbitration agreement. This, of course, increases the possibility of implementing the principle of autonomy of the will of the parties. The authors come to the conclusion that there is also a tendency to form more specific limits of the autonomy of the will when concluding an arbitration agreement. The article analyzes the materials of the judicial and arbitration practice of the Russian jurisdiction, when the autonomy of the will at the conclusion of an arbitration agreement is limited. The authors highlight the criteria for the possibility of applying an arbitration agreement-validity and enforceability, the practice of which is quite contradictory.","PeriodicalId":100717,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Sociology of Law","volume":"64 1","pages":"88-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possibilities and Limits of Implementation by the Parties of the Arbitration Agreement and the Principle of Autonomy of Will: Current Trends\",\"authors\":\"К. A. Golubenko, E. Voskresenskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.35854/2219-6242-2021-1-88-93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the principle of the autonomy of the will, which is fundamental in the regulation of the settlement of disputes arising from the foreign economic relations of the parties. The most important principle under consideration, in particular, allows the parties to decide which law will be applied to regulate their relationship and which court or arbitration will be given the competence to resolve their disputes. The authors note the tendency of the legislative sphere and law enforcement practice to give the parties as much freedom as possible when concluding and implementing the terms of an arbitration agreement. This, of course, increases the possibility of implementing the principle of autonomy of the will of the parties. The authors come to the conclusion that there is also a tendency to form more specific limits of the autonomy of the will when concluding an arbitration agreement. The article analyzes the materials of the judicial and arbitration practice of the Russian jurisdiction, when the autonomy of the will at the conclusion of an arbitration agreement is limited. The authors highlight the criteria for the possibility of applying an arbitration agreement-validity and enforceability, the practice of which is quite contradictory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of the Sociology of Law\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"88-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of the Sociology of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2021-1-88-93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Sociology of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2021-1-88-93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意志自治原则是规制当事人涉外经济关系纠纷解决的基本原则。正在审议的最重要的原则尤其允许当事方决定将适用哪条法律来调节它们之间的关系,以及将赋予哪一家法院或仲裁机构解决它们之间争端的权限。作者指出,立法领域和执法实践倾向于在订立和执行仲裁协议条款时给予当事人尽可能多的自由。当然,这增加了执行各方意志自治原则的可能性。作者认为,在订立仲裁协议时,也存在对意志自治形成更具体限制的趋势。本文分析了在仲裁协议订立时遗嘱自治受到限制的情况下,俄罗斯司法仲裁实践的资料。作者强调了适用仲裁协议的可能性的标准-有效性和可执行性,这在实践中是相当矛盾的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Possibilities and Limits of Implementation by the Parties of the Arbitration Agreement and the Principle of Autonomy of Will: Current Trends
The article analyzes the principle of the autonomy of the will, which is fundamental in the regulation of the settlement of disputes arising from the foreign economic relations of the parties. The most important principle under consideration, in particular, allows the parties to decide which law will be applied to regulate their relationship and which court or arbitration will be given the competence to resolve their disputes. The authors note the tendency of the legislative sphere and law enforcement practice to give the parties as much freedom as possible when concluding and implementing the terms of an arbitration agreement. This, of course, increases the possibility of implementing the principle of autonomy of the will of the parties. The authors come to the conclusion that there is also a tendency to form more specific limits of the autonomy of the will when concluding an arbitration agreement. The article analyzes the materials of the judicial and arbitration practice of the Russian jurisdiction, when the autonomy of the will at the conclusion of an arbitration agreement is limited. The authors highlight the criteria for the possibility of applying an arbitration agreement-validity and enforceability, the practice of which is quite contradictory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信