将癌症风险信息纳入全科诊疗:利用与卫生专业人员的焦点小组开展的定性研究。

Residue reviews Pub Date : 2017-03-01 Epub Date: 2017-02-13 DOI:10.3399/bjgp17X689401
Juliet A Usher-Smith, Barbora Silarova, Alison Ward, Jane Youell, Kenneth R Muir, Jackie Campbell, Joanne Warcaba
{"title":"将癌症风险信息纳入全科诊疗:利用与卫生专业人员的焦点小组开展的定性研究。","authors":"Juliet A Usher-Smith, Barbora Silarova, Alison Ward, Jane Youell, Kenneth R Muir, Jackie Campbell, Joanne Warcaba","doi":"10.3399/bjgp17X689401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is estimated that approximately 40% of all cases of cancer are attributable to lifestyle factors. Providing people with personalised information about their future risk of cancer may help promote behaviour change.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the views of health professionals on incorporating personalised cancer risk information, based on lifestyle factors, into general practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study using data from six focus groups with a total of 24 general practice health professionals from the NHS Nene Clinical Commissioning Group in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The focus groups were guided by a schedule covering current provision of lifestyle advice relating to cancer and views on incorporating personalised cancer risk information. Data were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and then analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Providing lifestyle advice was viewed as a core activity within general practice but the influence of lifestyle on cancer risk was rarely discussed. The word 'cancer' was seen as a potentially powerful motivator for lifestyle change but the fact that it could generate health anxiety was also recognised. Most focus group participants felt that a numerical risk estimate was more likely to influence behaviour than generic advice. All felt that general practice should provide this information, but there was a clear need for additional resources for it to be offered widely.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study participants were in support of providing personalised cancer risk information in general practice. The findings highlight a number of potential benefits and challenges that will inform the future development of interventions in general practice to promote behaviour change for cancer prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":76425,"journal":{"name":"Residue reviews","volume":"75 1","pages":"e218-e226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating cancer risk information into general practice: a qualitative study using focus groups with health professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Juliet A Usher-Smith, Barbora Silarova, Alison Ward, Jane Youell, Kenneth R Muir, Jackie Campbell, Joanne Warcaba\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/bjgp17X689401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is estimated that approximately 40% of all cases of cancer are attributable to lifestyle factors. Providing people with personalised information about their future risk of cancer may help promote behaviour change.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the views of health professionals on incorporating personalised cancer risk information, based on lifestyle factors, into general practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study using data from six focus groups with a total of 24 general practice health professionals from the NHS Nene Clinical Commissioning Group in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The focus groups were guided by a schedule covering current provision of lifestyle advice relating to cancer and views on incorporating personalised cancer risk information. Data were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and then analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Providing lifestyle advice was viewed as a core activity within general practice but the influence of lifestyle on cancer risk was rarely discussed. The word 'cancer' was seen as a potentially powerful motivator for lifestyle change but the fact that it could generate health anxiety was also recognised. Most focus group participants felt that a numerical risk estimate was more likely to influence behaviour than generic advice. All felt that general practice should provide this information, but there was a clear need for additional resources for it to be offered widely.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study participants were in support of providing personalised cancer risk information in general practice. The findings highlight a number of potential benefits and challenges that will inform the future development of interventions in general practice to promote behaviour change for cancer prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Residue reviews\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"e218-e226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325664/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Residue reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X689401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Residue reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X689401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据估计,约 40% 的癌症病例可归因于生活方式因素。向人们提供有关其未来患癌风险的个性化信息可能有助于促进行为改变。目的:探讨医疗专业人员对将基于生活方式因素的个性化癌症风险信息纳入全科实践的看法:定性研究使用了六个焦点小组的数据,共有 24 名来自英国国家医疗服务系统内内临床委员会小组的全科医疗专业人员参与:方法:焦点小组在一份日程表的指导下进行,该日程表涵盖了目前提供的与癌症有关的生活方式建议,以及对纳入个性化癌症风险信息的看法。对数据进行录音、逐字记录,然后使用主题分析法进行分析:结果:提供生活方式建议被视为全科医生的一项核心工作,但很少有人讨论生活方式对癌症风险的影响。癌症 "一词被视为改变生活方式的潜在强大动力,但它可能引发健康焦虑这一事实也得到了认可。大多数焦点小组参与者认为,数字风险估计比一般建议更有可能影响人们的行为。所有人都认为全科医生应该提供这种信息,但要广泛提供这种信息,显然需要额外的资源:研究参与者支持在全科医生中提供个性化的癌症风险信息。研究结果强调了一些潜在的益处和挑战,这些益处和挑战将为今后在全科医生中制定干预措施提供参考,以促进癌症预防行为的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incorporating cancer risk information into general practice: a qualitative study using focus groups with health professionals.

Background: It is estimated that approximately 40% of all cases of cancer are attributable to lifestyle factors. Providing people with personalised information about their future risk of cancer may help promote behaviour change.

Aim: To explore the views of health professionals on incorporating personalised cancer risk information, based on lifestyle factors, into general practice.

Design and setting: Qualitative study using data from six focus groups with a total of 24 general practice health professionals from the NHS Nene Clinical Commissioning Group in England.

Method: The focus groups were guided by a schedule covering current provision of lifestyle advice relating to cancer and views on incorporating personalised cancer risk information. Data were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and then analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Providing lifestyle advice was viewed as a core activity within general practice but the influence of lifestyle on cancer risk was rarely discussed. The word 'cancer' was seen as a potentially powerful motivator for lifestyle change but the fact that it could generate health anxiety was also recognised. Most focus group participants felt that a numerical risk estimate was more likely to influence behaviour than generic advice. All felt that general practice should provide this information, but there was a clear need for additional resources for it to be offered widely.

Conclusion: Study participants were in support of providing personalised cancer risk information in general practice. The findings highlight a number of potential benefits and challenges that will inform the future development of interventions in general practice to promote behaviour change for cancer prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信