Juliet A Usher-Smith, Barbora Silarova, Alison Ward, Jane Youell, Kenneth R Muir, Jackie Campbell, Joanne Warcaba
{"title":"将癌症风险信息纳入全科诊疗:利用与卫生专业人员的焦点小组开展的定性研究。","authors":"Juliet A Usher-Smith, Barbora Silarova, Alison Ward, Jane Youell, Kenneth R Muir, Jackie Campbell, Joanne Warcaba","doi":"10.3399/bjgp17X689401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is estimated that approximately 40% of all cases of cancer are attributable to lifestyle factors. Providing people with personalised information about their future risk of cancer may help promote behaviour change.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the views of health professionals on incorporating personalised cancer risk information, based on lifestyle factors, into general practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study using data from six focus groups with a total of 24 general practice health professionals from the NHS Nene Clinical Commissioning Group in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The focus groups were guided by a schedule covering current provision of lifestyle advice relating to cancer and views on incorporating personalised cancer risk information. Data were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and then analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Providing lifestyle advice was viewed as a core activity within general practice but the influence of lifestyle on cancer risk was rarely discussed. The word 'cancer' was seen as a potentially powerful motivator for lifestyle change but the fact that it could generate health anxiety was also recognised. Most focus group participants felt that a numerical risk estimate was more likely to influence behaviour than generic advice. All felt that general practice should provide this information, but there was a clear need for additional resources for it to be offered widely.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study participants were in support of providing personalised cancer risk information in general practice. The findings highlight a number of potential benefits and challenges that will inform the future development of interventions in general practice to promote behaviour change for cancer prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":76425,"journal":{"name":"Residue reviews","volume":"75 1","pages":"e218-e226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating cancer risk information into general practice: a qualitative study using focus groups with health professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Juliet A Usher-Smith, Barbora Silarova, Alison Ward, Jane Youell, Kenneth R Muir, Jackie Campbell, Joanne Warcaba\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/bjgp17X689401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is estimated that approximately 40% of all cases of cancer are attributable to lifestyle factors. Providing people with personalised information about their future risk of cancer may help promote behaviour change.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the views of health professionals on incorporating personalised cancer risk information, based on lifestyle factors, into general practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study using data from six focus groups with a total of 24 general practice health professionals from the NHS Nene Clinical Commissioning Group in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The focus groups were guided by a schedule covering current provision of lifestyle advice relating to cancer and views on incorporating personalised cancer risk information. Data were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and then analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Providing lifestyle advice was viewed as a core activity within general practice but the influence of lifestyle on cancer risk was rarely discussed. The word 'cancer' was seen as a potentially powerful motivator for lifestyle change but the fact that it could generate health anxiety was also recognised. Most focus group participants felt that a numerical risk estimate was more likely to influence behaviour than generic advice. All felt that general practice should provide this information, but there was a clear need for additional resources for it to be offered widely.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study participants were in support of providing personalised cancer risk information in general practice. The findings highlight a number of potential benefits and challenges that will inform the future development of interventions in general practice to promote behaviour change for cancer prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Residue reviews\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"e218-e226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5325664/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Residue reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X689401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Residue reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X689401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incorporating cancer risk information into general practice: a qualitative study using focus groups with health professionals.
Background: It is estimated that approximately 40% of all cases of cancer are attributable to lifestyle factors. Providing people with personalised information about their future risk of cancer may help promote behaviour change.
Aim: To explore the views of health professionals on incorporating personalised cancer risk information, based on lifestyle factors, into general practice.
Design and setting: Qualitative study using data from six focus groups with a total of 24 general practice health professionals from the NHS Nene Clinical Commissioning Group in England.
Method: The focus groups were guided by a schedule covering current provision of lifestyle advice relating to cancer and views on incorporating personalised cancer risk information. Data were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and then analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: Providing lifestyle advice was viewed as a core activity within general practice but the influence of lifestyle on cancer risk was rarely discussed. The word 'cancer' was seen as a potentially powerful motivator for lifestyle change but the fact that it could generate health anxiety was also recognised. Most focus group participants felt that a numerical risk estimate was more likely to influence behaviour than generic advice. All felt that general practice should provide this information, but there was a clear need for additional resources for it to be offered widely.
Conclusion: Study participants were in support of providing personalised cancer risk information in general practice. The findings highlight a number of potential benefits and challenges that will inform the future development of interventions in general practice to promote behaviour change for cancer prevention.