一种研究海蜂(Beta vulgaris ssp)杂种竞争能力的方法。耐草甘膦甜菜(B. vulgaris ssp.)。寻常的)

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
K. H. Madsen, G. S. Poulsen, J. Fredshavn, J. E. Jensen, P. Steen, J. Streibig
{"title":"一种研究海蜂(Beta vulgaris ssp)杂种竞争能力的方法。耐草甘膦甜菜(B. vulgaris ssp.)。寻常的)","authors":"K. H. Madsen, G. S. Poulsen, J. Fredshavn, J. E. Jensen, P. Steen, J. Streibig","doi":"10.1080/09064719809362495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A population of 50% transgenic hybrids between seabeet and a transgenic glyphosate tolerant sugarbeet was tested against pure lines of sugarbeet and seabeet to determine if a model could detect any significant differences between the hybrids and the pure lines. The competitive abilities were fairly constant over time. The 95% confidence limits, determined by the “bootstrap”; method, showed that biomass per plant at low densities and maximum biomass production per unit area were not significantly different among the three Beta lines. Based on above‐ground biomass recordings, the hybrid and sugarbeet lines were more competitive than the seabeet line. The hybrid line showed the highest competitive ability, which can be explained by hybrid vigour.","PeriodicalId":40817,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science","volume":"20 1","pages":"170-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method to study competitive ability of hybrids between seabeet (Beta vulgaris ssp. Maritima) and glyphosate tolerant sugarbeet (B. vulgaris ssp. Vulgaris)\",\"authors\":\"K. H. Madsen, G. S. Poulsen, J. Fredshavn, J. E. Jensen, P. Steen, J. Streibig\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09064719809362495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A population of 50% transgenic hybrids between seabeet and a transgenic glyphosate tolerant sugarbeet was tested against pure lines of sugarbeet and seabeet to determine if a model could detect any significant differences between the hybrids and the pure lines. The competitive abilities were fairly constant over time. The 95% confidence limits, determined by the “bootstrap”; method, showed that biomass per plant at low densities and maximum biomass production per unit area were not significantly different among the three Beta lines. Based on above‐ground biomass recordings, the hybrid and sugarbeet lines were more competitive than the seabeet line. The hybrid line showed the highest competitive ability, which can be explained by hybrid vigour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"170-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09064719809362495\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09064719809362495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在甜菜和海甜菜的纯种品系中,对50%转基因海甜菜和抗草甘膦转基因甜菜的杂交品系进行了测试,以确定模型是否可以检测到杂交品系和纯种品系之间的任何显著差异。随着时间的推移,竞争能力是相当稳定的。95%置信限,由“bootstrap”决定;结果表明,低密度单株生物量和单位面积最大生物量在3个β系间差异不显著。根据地上生物量记录,杂交品系和甜菜品系比小甜菜品系更具竞争力。杂交种表现出最高的竞争能力,这可以用杂交活力来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A method to study competitive ability of hybrids between seabeet (Beta vulgaris ssp. Maritima) and glyphosate tolerant sugarbeet (B. vulgaris ssp. Vulgaris)
A population of 50% transgenic hybrids between seabeet and a transgenic glyphosate tolerant sugarbeet was tested against pure lines of sugarbeet and seabeet to determine if a model could detect any significant differences between the hybrids and the pure lines. The competitive abilities were fairly constant over time. The 95% confidence limits, determined by the “bootstrap”; method, showed that biomass per plant at low densities and maximum biomass production per unit area were not significantly different among the three Beta lines. Based on above‐ground biomass recordings, the hybrid and sugarbeet lines were more competitive than the seabeet line. The hybrid line showed the highest competitive ability, which can be explained by hybrid vigour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica Section B publishes original research in applied soil and plant science with special attention given to to crop production in agri- and horticultural systems. We welcome manuscripts dealing with: Climate smart and sustainable crop production systems Water and nutrient efficiency Soil conservation and productivity Precise agriculture systems Applications of bio- and nanotechnology Digitalisation and robotics Soil-plant interactions Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section B – Soil & Plant Science forms part of a series of titles published on behalf of the Nordic Association of Agricultural Science (NJF). The series also includes Section A - Animal Science .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信