战略中的基本问题:是时候重新评估了?

D. Teece
{"title":"战略中的基本问题:是时候重新评估了?","authors":"D. Teece","doi":"10.1561/111.00000005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of strategic management has developed with an implicit assumption that market economies are structurally more or less similar. In the past 30 years, though, the global economy has evolved. The Soviet Union collapsed, market-based orthodoxy spread, and now China is ascendant. These developments require changing our mental models from the Cold War era, in which two economic biases were quite distinct, to a bifurcated global economy of two engaged but incompatible systems: one side favoring transparency and the rule of law and the other part favoring opaqueness and strategic direction of the economy by government. China’s government uses a wide range of policies to support the development of domestic firms while hindering the activities of competitors from abroad and, directly or indirectly, misappropriating their technology when they can do so, which is often. To cope with this situation—as well as with political uncertainty elsewhere in the world—firms need to develop strong dynamic capabilities for formulating viable strategies to create and capture value under potentially adverse and volatile conditions, and to shape the business environment in more favorable ways through market and non-market activity.","PeriodicalId":17054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"103-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fundamental Issues in Strategy: Time to Reassess?\",\"authors\":\"D. Teece\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/111.00000005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field of strategic management has developed with an implicit assumption that market economies are structurally more or less similar. In the past 30 years, though, the global economy has evolved. The Soviet Union collapsed, market-based orthodoxy spread, and now China is ascendant. These developments require changing our mental models from the Cold War era, in which two economic biases were quite distinct, to a bifurcated global economy of two engaged but incompatible systems: one side favoring transparency and the rule of law and the other part favoring opaqueness and strategic direction of the economy by government. China’s government uses a wide range of policies to support the development of domestic firms while hindering the activities of competitors from abroad and, directly or indirectly, misappropriating their technology when they can do so, which is often. To cope with this situation—as well as with political uncertainty elsewhere in the world—firms need to develop strong dynamic capabilities for formulating viable strategies to create and capture value under potentially adverse and volatile conditions, and to shape the business environment in more favorable ways through market and non-market activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"103-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/111.00000005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

战略管理领域的发展有一个隐含的假设,即市场经济在结构上或多或少是相似的。然而,在过去的30年里,全球经济发生了变化。苏联解体,以市场为基础的正统观念传播开来,现在中国正在崛起。这些发展需要改变我们的思维模式,从冷战时期的两种经济偏见截然不同,到两种相互接触但不相容的全球经济体系的分叉:一方赞成透明度和法治,另一方赞成不透明和政府经济的战略方向。中国政府使用广泛的政策来支持国内公司的发展,同时阻碍国外竞争对手的活动,并直接或间接地在可能的情况下盗用他们的技术,这是经常发生的。为了应对这种情况——以及世界其他地方的政治不确定性——企业需要发展强大的动态能力,以制定可行的战略,在潜在的不利和不稳定条件下创造和获取价值,并通过市场和非市场活动以更有利的方式塑造商业环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fundamental Issues in Strategy: Time to Reassess?
The field of strategic management has developed with an implicit assumption that market economies are structurally more or less similar. In the past 30 years, though, the global economy has evolved. The Soviet Union collapsed, market-based orthodoxy spread, and now China is ascendant. These developments require changing our mental models from the Cold War era, in which two economic biases were quite distinct, to a bifurcated global economy of two engaged but incompatible systems: one side favoring transparency and the rule of law and the other part favoring opaqueness and strategic direction of the economy by government. China’s government uses a wide range of policies to support the development of domestic firms while hindering the activities of competitors from abroad and, directly or indirectly, misappropriating their technology when they can do so, which is often. To cope with this situation—as well as with political uncertainty elsewhere in the world—firms need to develop strong dynamic capabilities for formulating viable strategies to create and capture value under potentially adverse and volatile conditions, and to shape the business environment in more favorable ways through market and non-market activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信