子宫内膜异位性卵巢囊肿:腹腔镜消融手术一例

Kevin D. Jones, Christopher Sutton
{"title":"子宫内膜异位性卵巢囊肿:腹腔镜消融手术一例","authors":"Kevin D. Jones,&nbsp;Christopher Sutton","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00461.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To present a synopsis of the evidence supporting ablative laparoscopic surgery for endometriotic cysts.</p><p>Review article.</p><p>Endometriotic cysts can be managed laparoscopically by stripping, and excising or ablation of the capsule.</p><p>The clinical outcome of each technique in terms of cyst recurrence, pregnancy rates, pain relief and patient satisfaction are broadly similar, but this may reflect study design and in particular, the variable follow up periods, and methods used to document outcome measures. There are concerns that excision may result in post operative adhesion formation and damage to the underlying oocytes which may impair fertility, produce chronic pain, and premature menopause. These concerns arise from the postulated aetiology and pathogenesis of ovarian endometriomas.</p><p>There is no clear evidence to suggest that one minimal access surgical technique is superior to another for the management of endometriotic cysts. However, ablation of the capsule is a theoretically superior technique, with no demonstrable disadvantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 5-6","pages":"281-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00461.x","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endometriotic ovarian cysts: the case for ablative laparoscopic surgery\",\"authors\":\"Kevin D. Jones,&nbsp;Christopher Sutton\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00461.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To present a synopsis of the evidence supporting ablative laparoscopic surgery for endometriotic cysts.</p><p>Review article.</p><p>Endometriotic cysts can be managed laparoscopically by stripping, and excising or ablation of the capsule.</p><p>The clinical outcome of each technique in terms of cyst recurrence, pregnancy rates, pain relief and patient satisfaction are broadly similar, but this may reflect study design and in particular, the variable follow up periods, and methods used to document outcome measures. There are concerns that excision may result in post operative adhesion formation and damage to the underlying oocytes which may impair fertility, produce chronic pain, and premature menopause. These concerns arise from the postulated aetiology and pathogenesis of ovarian endometriomas.</p><p>There is no clear evidence to suggest that one minimal access surgical technique is superior to another for the management of endometriotic cysts. However, ablation of the capsule is a theoretically superior technique, with no demonstrable disadvantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"10 5-6\",\"pages\":\"281-287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00461.x\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00461.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00461.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

摘要介绍支持腹腔镜消融手术治疗子宫内膜异位囊肿的证据。评论文章。子宫内膜异位囊肿可以通过腹腔镜剥离、切除或消融包膜来治疗。每种技术在囊肿复发率、妊娠率、疼痛缓解和患者满意度方面的临床结果大致相似,但这可能反映了研究设计,特别是可变的随访期,以及用于记录结果测量的方法。人们担心切除可能导致术后粘连形成和下层卵母细胞损伤,从而影响生育能力,产生慢性疼痛和过早绝经。这些担忧源于卵巢子宫内膜异位瘤的假定病因和发病机制。没有明确的证据表明一种微创手术技术优于另一种治疗子宫内膜异位囊肿的技术。然而,胶囊的消融在理论上是一种优越的技术,没有明显的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endometriotic ovarian cysts: the case for ablative laparoscopic surgery

To present a synopsis of the evidence supporting ablative laparoscopic surgery for endometriotic cysts.

Review article.

Endometriotic cysts can be managed laparoscopically by stripping, and excising or ablation of the capsule.

The clinical outcome of each technique in terms of cyst recurrence, pregnancy rates, pain relief and patient satisfaction are broadly similar, but this may reflect study design and in particular, the variable follow up periods, and methods used to document outcome measures. There are concerns that excision may result in post operative adhesion formation and damage to the underlying oocytes which may impair fertility, produce chronic pain, and premature menopause. These concerns arise from the postulated aetiology and pathogenesis of ovarian endometriomas.

There is no clear evidence to suggest that one minimal access surgical technique is superior to another for the management of endometriotic cysts. However, ablation of the capsule is a theoretically superior technique, with no demonstrable disadvantages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信