传统偏航轴控制与闭环偏航轴控制的比较

Ju Kunru, Zhang Renjie, Xu Danli
{"title":"传统偏航轴控制与闭环偏航轴控制的比较","authors":"Ju Kunru, Zhang Renjie, Xu Danli","doi":"10.1109/CCIENG.2011.6008086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary flight control system (PFCS) provides full time and full authority three axis, dynamic control law functions (pitch, roll and yaw) and non-dynamic control law functions (aileron droop, speed brake and ground lift dump). In addition, the PFCS calculates operational and limiting airspeed in order to provide full flight envelope protection across the entire flight envelope. PFCS provides limited gust alleviation function in the yaw axis. This paper provides a high level comparison of conventional Yaw Axis control (Pedal to Surface with Augmentation) versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis control. Pedal to Surface versus Closed Loop design options have implications on a variety of factors including Human Factors, Gust Response, structural limiting requirements, asymmetric thrust response, and rudder trim.","PeriodicalId":6316,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of conventional Yaw Axis control versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis control\",\"authors\":\"Ju Kunru, Zhang Renjie, Xu Danli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCIENG.2011.6008086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primary flight control system (PFCS) provides full time and full authority three axis, dynamic control law functions (pitch, roll and yaw) and non-dynamic control law functions (aileron droop, speed brake and ground lift dump). In addition, the PFCS calculates operational and limiting airspeed in order to provide full flight envelope protection across the entire flight envelope. PFCS provides limited gust alleviation function in the yaw axis. This paper provides a high level comparison of conventional Yaw Axis control (Pedal to Surface with Augmentation) versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis control. Pedal to Surface versus Closed Loop design options have implications on a variety of factors including Human Factors, Gust Response, structural limiting requirements, asymmetric thrust response, and rudder trim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCIENG.2011.6008086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCIENG.2011.6008086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主飞行控制系统(PFCS)提供全时间和全权限三轴,动态控制律功能(俯仰,滚转和偏航)和非动态控制律功能(副翼下垂,速度制动和地面升力转储)。此外,PFCS计算操作和限制空速,以便在整个飞行包线中提供完整的飞行包线保护。PFCS在偏航轴上提供有限的阵风缓解功能。本文提供了传统偏航轴控制(踏板到地面与增强)与闭环偏航轴控制的高层次比较。踏板到地面与闭环设计的选择涉及多种因素,包括人为因素、阵风响应、结构限制要求、非对称推力响应和方向舵装饰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The comparison of conventional Yaw Axis control versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis control
The primary flight control system (PFCS) provides full time and full authority three axis, dynamic control law functions (pitch, roll and yaw) and non-dynamic control law functions (aileron droop, speed brake and ground lift dump). In addition, the PFCS calculates operational and limiting airspeed in order to provide full flight envelope protection across the entire flight envelope. PFCS provides limited gust alleviation function in the yaw axis. This paper provides a high level comparison of conventional Yaw Axis control (Pedal to Surface with Augmentation) versus Closed Loop Yaw Axis control. Pedal to Surface versus Closed Loop design options have implications on a variety of factors including Human Factors, Gust Response, structural limiting requirements, asymmetric thrust response, and rudder trim.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信