高疫苗效力背景下的主要替代物

A. Callegaro, F. Tibaldi, D. Follmann
{"title":"高疫苗效力背景下的主要替代物","authors":"A. Callegaro, F. Tibaldi, D. Follmann","doi":"10.21203/rs.2.16785/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The use of correlates of protection (CoPs) in vaccination trials offers significant advantages as useful clinical endpoint substitutes. Vaccines with very high vaccine efficacy (VE) are documented in the literature (95% or above). Callegaro, A., and F. Tibaldi. 2019. “Assessing Correlates of Protection in Vaccine Trials: Statistical Solutions in the Context of High Vaccine Efficacy.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 19: 47 showed that the rare infections observed in the vaccinated groups of these trials poses challenges when applying conventionally-used statistical methods for CoP assessment such as the Prentice criteria and meta-analysis. The objective of this work is to investigate the impact of this problem on another statistical method for the assessment of CoPs called Principal stratification. Methods We perform simulation experiments to investigate the effect of high vaccine efficacy on the performance of the Principal Stratification approach. Results Similarly to the Prentice framework, simulation results show that the power of the Principal Stratification approach decreases when the VE grows. Conclusions It can be challenging to validate principal surrogates (and statistical surrogates) for vaccines with very high vaccine efficacy.","PeriodicalId":74867,"journal":{"name":"Statistical communications in infectious diseases","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principal surrogates in context of high vaccine efficacy\",\"authors\":\"A. Callegaro, F. Tibaldi, D. Follmann\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.2.16785/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives The use of correlates of protection (CoPs) in vaccination trials offers significant advantages as useful clinical endpoint substitutes. Vaccines with very high vaccine efficacy (VE) are documented in the literature (95% or above). Callegaro, A., and F. Tibaldi. 2019. “Assessing Correlates of Protection in Vaccine Trials: Statistical Solutions in the Context of High Vaccine Efficacy.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 19: 47 showed that the rare infections observed in the vaccinated groups of these trials poses challenges when applying conventionally-used statistical methods for CoP assessment such as the Prentice criteria and meta-analysis. The objective of this work is to investigate the impact of this problem on another statistical method for the assessment of CoPs called Principal stratification. Methods We perform simulation experiments to investigate the effect of high vaccine efficacy on the performance of the Principal Stratification approach. Results Similarly to the Prentice framework, simulation results show that the power of the Principal Stratification approach decreases when the VE grows. Conclusions It can be challenging to validate principal surrogates (and statistical surrogates) for vaccines with very high vaccine efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical communications in infectious diseases\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical communications in infectious diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.16785/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical communications in infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.16785/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在疫苗接种试验中使用相关保护(cop)作为有用的临床终点替代品具有显著的优势。文献记载了具有非常高疫苗效力(VE)的疫苗(95%或以上)。Callegaro, A.和F. Tibaldi. 2019。评估疫苗试验中保护的相关因素:高疫苗效力背景下的统计解决方案。BMC医学研究方法学19:47表明,在这些试验的接种疫苗组中观察到的罕见感染,在应用传统的统计方法(如Prentice标准和荟萃分析)进行CoP评估时提出了挑战。这项工作的目的是调查这个问题对评估cop的另一种统计方法的影响,称为主要分层。方法通过模拟实验研究高疫苗效力对主分层方法性能的影响。结果与普伦蒂斯框架相似,仿真结果表明,随着VE的增大,主分层方法的功率减小。结论验证具有很高疫苗效力的疫苗的主要替代物(和统计替代物)可能具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Principal surrogates in context of high vaccine efficacy
Abstract Objectives The use of correlates of protection (CoPs) in vaccination trials offers significant advantages as useful clinical endpoint substitutes. Vaccines with very high vaccine efficacy (VE) are documented in the literature (95% or above). Callegaro, A., and F. Tibaldi. 2019. “Assessing Correlates of Protection in Vaccine Trials: Statistical Solutions in the Context of High Vaccine Efficacy.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 19: 47 showed that the rare infections observed in the vaccinated groups of these trials poses challenges when applying conventionally-used statistical methods for CoP assessment such as the Prentice criteria and meta-analysis. The objective of this work is to investigate the impact of this problem on another statistical method for the assessment of CoPs called Principal stratification. Methods We perform simulation experiments to investigate the effect of high vaccine efficacy on the performance of the Principal Stratification approach. Results Similarly to the Prentice framework, simulation results show that the power of the Principal Stratification approach decreases when the VE grows. Conclusions It can be challenging to validate principal surrogates (and statistical surrogates) for vaccines with very high vaccine efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信