受歧视个体:他人因时间和地点的性格和情境归因

Fernando Gomez, Luis A. Vega
{"title":"受歧视个体:他人因时间和地点的性格和情境归因","authors":"Fernando Gomez, Luis A. Vega","doi":"10.13189/ujp.2020.080201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We used a social psychological approach to examine keywords that across time, place, and people have been used to disempower or empower individuals. Using a consensus model and face validity, two raters chose a purposeful sample of 10 sources to do a critical case analysis (Patton, 2002) consisting of books, articles, or monographs that were located using the following labels: racism, science, history, racial identification, inferiority, social issues, phrenology, psychology, prejudice, discrimination and criminal. In all, 108 keywords were identified as uniquely describing empowering and disempowering label attributes (100% inter-rater agreement). Each keyword was classified according to term denoted by word (noun or adjective), internal and external perspective (biological or sociological), and target (humanize, genocide, dehumanize, suppression). Moreover, the purpose of this qualitative research was to identify how these terms were employed to establish a status of inferiority and to validate the suppression of native populations, minorities, and other non-White groups and target of the label given. The results mainly depicted that psychology has been used to substantiate racists agendas; however, it can promote empowerment by encouraging social awareness of the underlying racial issues.","PeriodicalId":23456,"journal":{"name":"Universal Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discriminated Individuals: Others' Dispositional and Situational Attributions by Time and Place\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Gomez, Luis A. Vega\",\"doi\":\"10.13189/ujp.2020.080201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We used a social psychological approach to examine keywords that across time, place, and people have been used to disempower or empower individuals. Using a consensus model and face validity, two raters chose a purposeful sample of 10 sources to do a critical case analysis (Patton, 2002) consisting of books, articles, or monographs that were located using the following labels: racism, science, history, racial identification, inferiority, social issues, phrenology, psychology, prejudice, discrimination and criminal. In all, 108 keywords were identified as uniquely describing empowering and disempowering label attributes (100% inter-rater agreement). Each keyword was classified according to term denoted by word (noun or adjective), internal and external perspective (biological or sociological), and target (humanize, genocide, dehumanize, suppression). Moreover, the purpose of this qualitative research was to identify how these terms were employed to establish a status of inferiority and to validate the suppression of native populations, minorities, and other non-White groups and target of the label given. The results mainly depicted that psychology has been used to substantiate racists agendas; however, it can promote empowerment by encouraging social awareness of the underlying racial issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universal Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universal Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13189/ujp.2020.080201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/ujp.2020.080201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用社会心理学的方法来检查关键词,这些关键词跨越时间、地点和人,被用来剥夺或赋予个人权力。使用共识模型和面孔效度,两名评分员选择了10个来源的有目的样本进行关键案例分析(Patton, 2002),包括使用以下标签定位的书籍、文章或专著:种族主义、科学、历史、种族认同、自卑、社会问题、颅相学、心理学、偏见、歧视和犯罪。总共有108个关键字被确定为唯一地描述授权和不授权的标签属性(100%的评分一致)。每个关键词根据单词(名词或形容词)、内部和外部视角(生物学或社会学)、目标(人性化、种族灭绝、非人化、镇压)进行分类。此外,这一定性研究的目的是确定这些术语是如何被用来建立一种自卑的地位,并证实对土著人口、少数民族和其他非白人群体和所给标签的目标的压制。结果主要描述了心理学被用来证实种族主义议程;然而,它可以通过鼓励社会对潜在的种族问题的认识来促进赋予权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discriminated Individuals: Others' Dispositional and Situational Attributions by Time and Place
We used a social psychological approach to examine keywords that across time, place, and people have been used to disempower or empower individuals. Using a consensus model and face validity, two raters chose a purposeful sample of 10 sources to do a critical case analysis (Patton, 2002) consisting of books, articles, or monographs that were located using the following labels: racism, science, history, racial identification, inferiority, social issues, phrenology, psychology, prejudice, discrimination and criminal. In all, 108 keywords were identified as uniquely describing empowering and disempowering label attributes (100% inter-rater agreement). Each keyword was classified according to term denoted by word (noun or adjective), internal and external perspective (biological or sociological), and target (humanize, genocide, dehumanize, suppression). Moreover, the purpose of this qualitative research was to identify how these terms were employed to establish a status of inferiority and to validate the suppression of native populations, minorities, and other non-White groups and target of the label given. The results mainly depicted that psychology has been used to substantiate racists agendas; however, it can promote empowerment by encouraging social awareness of the underlying racial issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信