危机时期反应过度与反应不足的政策修辞与理论

IF 4.3 2区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
M. Maor
{"title":"危机时期反应过度与反应不足的政策修辞与理论","authors":"M. Maor","doi":"10.1332/030557317X14843233064353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on policy design processes, undertaken in the run up to a potential crisis and in times of crisis requiring drastic measures, in order to explore the policy content which is available for policymakers in the form of policy over- and underraction options. It identifies two policy options – rhetoric and doctrine – for each mode of disproportionate policy response. These alternatives are then defined in terms of whether an all-or-nothing policy commitment is sought which is backed by a large amount of resources (e.g., money, time, political, or moral capital) available to use with discretion during a crisis. The argument advanced is that under such conditions, policy over- and underreaction rhetoric and doctrines may be carefully thought out, carefully developed, meticulously debated, and executed as planned. This argument is illustrated in military, financial and environmental domains in the U.S., Britain, Israel, the Palestinian Authority, the European Union and the OECD.","PeriodicalId":47631,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Politics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rhetoric and Doctrines of Policy Over- and Underreactions in Times of Crisis\",\"authors\":\"M. Maor\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/030557317X14843233064353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on policy design processes, undertaken in the run up to a potential crisis and in times of crisis requiring drastic measures, in order to explore the policy content which is available for policymakers in the form of policy over- and underraction options. It identifies two policy options – rhetoric and doctrine – for each mode of disproportionate policy response. These alternatives are then defined in terms of whether an all-or-nothing policy commitment is sought which is backed by a large amount of resources (e.g., money, time, political, or moral capital) available to use with discretion during a crisis. The argument advanced is that under such conditions, policy over- and underreaction rhetoric and doctrines may be carefully thought out, carefully developed, meticulously debated, and executed as planned. This argument is illustrated in military, financial and environmental domains in the U.S., Britain, Israel, the Palestinian Authority, the European Union and the OECD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy and Politics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14843233064353\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14843233064353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

本文侧重于政策设计过程,在潜在危机和需要采取激烈措施的危机时期进行,以探索政策内容,可供政策制定者以政策反应过度和反应不足的形式选择。它为每一种不成比例的政策反应模式确定了两种政策选择——修辞和原则。然后根据是否寻求有大量资源(如金钱、时间、政治或道德资本)支持的全有或全无政策承诺来定义这些替代方案,以便在危机期间酌情使用。提出的论点是,在这种情况下,政策反应过度或反应不足的言论和理论可能会被仔细考虑,仔细制定,精心辩论,并按计划执行。这一论点在美国、英国、以色列、巴勒斯坦权力机构、欧盟和经合组织的军事、金融和环境领域都得到了说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rhetoric and Doctrines of Policy Over- and Underreactions in Times of Crisis
This paper focuses on policy design processes, undertaken in the run up to a potential crisis and in times of crisis requiring drastic measures, in order to explore the policy content which is available for policymakers in the form of policy over- and underraction options. It identifies two policy options – rhetoric and doctrine – for each mode of disproportionate policy response. These alternatives are then defined in terms of whether an all-or-nothing policy commitment is sought which is backed by a large amount of resources (e.g., money, time, political, or moral capital) available to use with discretion during a crisis. The argument advanced is that under such conditions, policy over- and underreaction rhetoric and doctrines may be carefully thought out, carefully developed, meticulously debated, and executed as planned. This argument is illustrated in military, financial and environmental domains in the U.S., Britain, Israel, the Palestinian Authority, the European Union and the OECD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信