{"title":"介绍场论的发展","authors":"D. Loewenthal","doi":"10.1080/13642537.2022.2069221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I can remember when I first started as a therapist seeing a particular client and thinking ‘I must get some earlier nights!’. Then, the next client came in and I felt very much awake again (even though no words had yet been spoken). How might one explain this? For (Merleau-Ponty, 1962/2002) something emerges in the between. It is as if people or even objects communicate non-verbally with each other. For Merleau-Ponty this was mysterious, and sometimes if we try and take the mystery away we might take away the thing itself. I among others have considered the therapeutic relationship to be magical (Loewenthal, 2022, pp. 96–101). There again, there have been many attempts within the psychological therapies to consider such phenomena as paranormal with ‘. . . such concepts as the uncanny (Freud, 1919), synchronicity (Jung, 1960), the transpersonal (Daniels, 2005, Mintz & Schmeidler, 1983), telepathy (Totton, 2003), mindfulness (Clarke, 2014) and anomalous experiences (for example Sollod, 1992). . .. Abraham and Torok (1994). . . metaphorics bring to life beings like the crypt, ghosts, goblins, and phantoms.. . . the exploration by Frosh (2012) of hauntings. . . Fisher 2014 on hautology. . .’ (Loewenthal, 2022, p. 2). More generally, there have been attempts to name what appears not to be able to be spoken of with concepts such as ‘tacit knowledge’ (Polyani, 1966). But perhaps Ogden (1994) ‘analytic third’ and his ‘ontological psychoanalysis’ (Ogden, 2019) with Winnicott (1971) ‘playing rather than play’, and particularly Bion’s ‘the dreaming rather than dream’ (Bion, 1970), hold the promise of the client and therapist together becoming creatively more alive. Yet is it possible to go further in describing the indescribable? Could it be that the two book reviews in this Special Issue give a further indication of the kind of site of therapeutic knowledge that we are unknowingly working with? One of the editors of this special issue, Robert Snell, in his book Cézanne and the post-Bionian field: an exploration and meditation, fascinatingly explains how Cézanne through his paintings is able to communicate to us how objects influence each other – just as therapist and client do.","PeriodicalId":44564,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to developments in field theory\",\"authors\":\"D. Loewenthal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13642537.2022.2069221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I can remember when I first started as a therapist seeing a particular client and thinking ‘I must get some earlier nights!’. Then, the next client came in and I felt very much awake again (even though no words had yet been spoken). How might one explain this? For (Merleau-Ponty, 1962/2002) something emerges in the between. It is as if people or even objects communicate non-verbally with each other. For Merleau-Ponty this was mysterious, and sometimes if we try and take the mystery away we might take away the thing itself. I among others have considered the therapeutic relationship to be magical (Loewenthal, 2022, pp. 96–101). There again, there have been many attempts within the psychological therapies to consider such phenomena as paranormal with ‘. . . such concepts as the uncanny (Freud, 1919), synchronicity (Jung, 1960), the transpersonal (Daniels, 2005, Mintz & Schmeidler, 1983), telepathy (Totton, 2003), mindfulness (Clarke, 2014) and anomalous experiences (for example Sollod, 1992). . .. Abraham and Torok (1994). . . metaphorics bring to life beings like the crypt, ghosts, goblins, and phantoms.. . . the exploration by Frosh (2012) of hauntings. . . Fisher 2014 on hautology. . .’ (Loewenthal, 2022, p. 2). More generally, there have been attempts to name what appears not to be able to be spoken of with concepts such as ‘tacit knowledge’ (Polyani, 1966). But perhaps Ogden (1994) ‘analytic third’ and his ‘ontological psychoanalysis’ (Ogden, 2019) with Winnicott (1971) ‘playing rather than play’, and particularly Bion’s ‘the dreaming rather than dream’ (Bion, 1970), hold the promise of the client and therapist together becoming creatively more alive. Yet is it possible to go further in describing the indescribable? Could it be that the two book reviews in this Special Issue give a further indication of the kind of site of therapeutic knowledge that we are unknowingly working with? One of the editors of this special issue, Robert Snell, in his book Cézanne and the post-Bionian field: an exploration and meditation, fascinatingly explains how Cézanne through his paintings is able to communicate to us how objects influence each other – just as therapist and client do.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2069221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2069221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我还记得当我第一次开始做治疗师的时候,看到一个特定的客户,我就想:“我必须早点睡!”然后,下一个客户进来了,我又感到非常清醒了(尽管还没有说什么话)。怎么解释呢?对于梅洛-庞蒂(merlo - ponty, 1962/2002)来说,某种东西出现在两者之间。就好像人甚至物体彼此之间进行非语言交流一样。对梅洛-庞蒂来说,这是很神秘的,有时候,如果我们试图揭开神秘的面纱,我们可能会揭开事物本身。我和其他人都认为这种治疗关系是神奇的(Loewenthal, 2022, pp. 96-101)。再一次,在心理治疗中有很多尝试将这种现象视为超自然现象,用“…”如神秘(弗洛伊德,1919),共时性(荣格,1960),超个人(丹尼尔斯,2005,明茨和施米德勒,1983),心灵感应(托顿,2003),正念(克拉克,2014)和异常体验(例如索洛德,1992). . ..亚伯拉罕和托鲁克(1994)…隐喻带来了生命,如地穴,鬼,妖精和幽灵.. ..Frosh(2012)对幽灵的探索…Fisher 2014 on hautology……”(Loewenthal, 2022,第2页)。更一般地说,有人试图用“隐性知识”(Polyani, 1966)等概念来命名那些似乎无法被提及的东西。但也许奥格登(1994)的“分析第三”和他的“本体论精神分析”(奥格登,2019)与温尼科特(1971)的“玩而不是玩”,尤其是比昂的“梦而不是梦”(比昂,1970),共同承诺了客户和治疗师变得更有创造力。然而,在描述不可描述的事物时,是否有可能走得更远呢?这期特刊上的两篇书评会不会进一步表明我们正在不知不觉中研究的治疗知识的种类?本期特刊的编辑之一罗伯特·斯内尔在他的书《csamzanne和后bionian领域:探索与冥想》中,引人入胜地解释了csamzanne是如何通过他的绘画向我们传达物体是如何相互影响的——就像治疗师和客户之间的关系一样。
I can remember when I first started as a therapist seeing a particular client and thinking ‘I must get some earlier nights!’. Then, the next client came in and I felt very much awake again (even though no words had yet been spoken). How might one explain this? For (Merleau-Ponty, 1962/2002) something emerges in the between. It is as if people or even objects communicate non-verbally with each other. For Merleau-Ponty this was mysterious, and sometimes if we try and take the mystery away we might take away the thing itself. I among others have considered the therapeutic relationship to be magical (Loewenthal, 2022, pp. 96–101). There again, there have been many attempts within the psychological therapies to consider such phenomena as paranormal with ‘. . . such concepts as the uncanny (Freud, 1919), synchronicity (Jung, 1960), the transpersonal (Daniels, 2005, Mintz & Schmeidler, 1983), telepathy (Totton, 2003), mindfulness (Clarke, 2014) and anomalous experiences (for example Sollod, 1992). . .. Abraham and Torok (1994). . . metaphorics bring to life beings like the crypt, ghosts, goblins, and phantoms.. . . the exploration by Frosh (2012) of hauntings. . . Fisher 2014 on hautology. . .’ (Loewenthal, 2022, p. 2). More generally, there have been attempts to name what appears not to be able to be spoken of with concepts such as ‘tacit knowledge’ (Polyani, 1966). But perhaps Ogden (1994) ‘analytic third’ and his ‘ontological psychoanalysis’ (Ogden, 2019) with Winnicott (1971) ‘playing rather than play’, and particularly Bion’s ‘the dreaming rather than dream’ (Bion, 1970), hold the promise of the client and therapist together becoming creatively more alive. Yet is it possible to go further in describing the indescribable? Could it be that the two book reviews in this Special Issue give a further indication of the kind of site of therapeutic knowledge that we are unknowingly working with? One of the editors of this special issue, Robert Snell, in his book Cézanne and the post-Bionian field: an exploration and meditation, fascinatingly explains how Cézanne through his paintings is able to communicate to us how objects influence each other – just as therapist and client do.