公众参与立法(印尼、南非、美国法律比较研究)

Delfina Gusman, Yunita Syofyan
{"title":"公众参与立法(印尼、南非、美国法律比较研究)","authors":"Delfina Gusman, Yunita Syofyan","doi":"10.25077/nalrev.v.6.i.2.p.133-145.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community participation and the legal needs of the community are inherent in the process of forming laws. In fact, these two elements are manifestations and crystallizations of the ideal idea of ​​democracy. In a democracy, public participation is a condition sine qua non. Without public participation in the process of making laws, it will only result in authoritarian regulations and bias against the true meaning of democracy. So that it will result in the formation of laws that are not sourced from the soul and legal needs of the community (volkgeist). The method in this study uses legal research methods with a qualitative approach in the form of normative legal studies and (normative legal studies), where the type of research is descriptive analytical research. In addition, the approach used is a comparative approach (comparison), a historical approach, an institutional approach and a futuristic approach. Community participation in the formation of laws in Indonesia, South Africa and the United States has already started. Although public participation in law-making has some constraints such as slowdown in the legislative process and budgetary requirements, it brings more benefits to the government and society. However, the legitimacy of the process, the issue of justice, also creates better regulations and ultimately creates a stronger quality of democracy so that there is no doubt that public participation is an important part of the legislative process.","PeriodicalId":33148,"journal":{"name":"Nagari Law Review","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Participation In Legislation (Legal Comparation Studies In Indonesia, South Africa, And United State)\",\"authors\":\"Delfina Gusman, Yunita Syofyan\",\"doi\":\"10.25077/nalrev.v.6.i.2.p.133-145.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Community participation and the legal needs of the community are inherent in the process of forming laws. In fact, these two elements are manifestations and crystallizations of the ideal idea of ​​democracy. In a democracy, public participation is a condition sine qua non. Without public participation in the process of making laws, it will only result in authoritarian regulations and bias against the true meaning of democracy. So that it will result in the formation of laws that are not sourced from the soul and legal needs of the community (volkgeist). The method in this study uses legal research methods with a qualitative approach in the form of normative legal studies and (normative legal studies), where the type of research is descriptive analytical research. In addition, the approach used is a comparative approach (comparison), a historical approach, an institutional approach and a futuristic approach. Community participation in the formation of laws in Indonesia, South Africa and the United States has already started. Although public participation in law-making has some constraints such as slowdown in the legislative process and budgetary requirements, it brings more benefits to the government and society. However, the legitimacy of the process, the issue of justice, also creates better regulations and ultimately creates a stronger quality of democracy so that there is no doubt that public participation is an important part of the legislative process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nagari Law Review\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nagari Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.6.i.2.p.133-145.2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagari Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.6.i.2.p.133-145.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社区参与和社区的法律需求是法律形成过程中所固有的。事实上,这两个因素是民主理想思想的表现和结晶。在民主国家,公众参与是必不可少的条件。在制定法律的过程中,如果没有公众的参与,只会导致专制的规制和对民主主义真正意义的偏见。因此,它将导致法律的形成,而不是来源于社区的灵魂和法律需求(volkgeist)。本研究的方法采用法律研究方法,以规范性法律研究和(规范性法律研究)的形式采用定性方法,其中研究类型是描述性分析研究。此外,所使用的方法是比较方法(比较),历史方法,制度方法和未来方法。在印度尼西亚、南非和美国,社区参与制定法律的工作已经开始。公众参与立法虽然存在立法进程放缓、预算要求等制约因素,但却给政府和社会带来了更多的利益。然而,程序的合法性,即正义问题,也创造了更好的规则,并最终创造了更强的民主质量,因此,公众参与无疑是立法程序的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Participation In Legislation (Legal Comparation Studies In Indonesia, South Africa, And United State)
Community participation and the legal needs of the community are inherent in the process of forming laws. In fact, these two elements are manifestations and crystallizations of the ideal idea of ​​democracy. In a democracy, public participation is a condition sine qua non. Without public participation in the process of making laws, it will only result in authoritarian regulations and bias against the true meaning of democracy. So that it will result in the formation of laws that are not sourced from the soul and legal needs of the community (volkgeist). The method in this study uses legal research methods with a qualitative approach in the form of normative legal studies and (normative legal studies), where the type of research is descriptive analytical research. In addition, the approach used is a comparative approach (comparison), a historical approach, an institutional approach and a futuristic approach. Community participation in the formation of laws in Indonesia, South Africa and the United States has already started. Although public participation in law-making has some constraints such as slowdown in the legislative process and budgetary requirements, it brings more benefits to the government and society. However, the legitimacy of the process, the issue of justice, also creates better regulations and ultimately creates a stronger quality of democracy so that there is no doubt that public participation is an important part of the legislative process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信