哲学是一种实践。40年后的危机

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Krisis Pub Date : 2020-12-11 DOI:10.21827/krisis.40.1.36975
I. Haan
{"title":"哲学是一种实践。40年后的危机","authors":"I. Haan","doi":"10.21827/krisis.40.1.36975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In its forty years of existence, Krisis, as a journal of contemporary philosophy, has aimed to develop a new philosophical praxis. This praxis is sketched here in the first place as the practical work of making a journal, in the context of a community of philosophers discussing a canon of contemporary thinkers as well a range of shared problems. Yet beyond that, Krisis has always struggled with the question how, as a philosophical practice, it is related to other practices. The debate about “empirical philosophy” forms a crucial episode in this debate, in which Krisis has explored analytical, existentialist, pragmatist and Marxist approaches to a philosophy as praxis. Since then, this debate has shifted along four dimensions, of science, culture, politics and economy. In conclusion, it is argued that the entanglement of the praxis of Krisis with these four other practices makes it difficult to identify what is philosophical about Krisis.\n ","PeriodicalId":38842,"journal":{"name":"Krisis","volume":"72 2 1","pages":"48-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Filosofie als praktijk. Krisis na 40 jaar\",\"authors\":\"I. Haan\",\"doi\":\"10.21827/krisis.40.1.36975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In its forty years of existence, Krisis, as a journal of contemporary philosophy, has aimed to develop a new philosophical praxis. This praxis is sketched here in the first place as the practical work of making a journal, in the context of a community of philosophers discussing a canon of contemporary thinkers as well a range of shared problems. Yet beyond that, Krisis has always struggled with the question how, as a philosophical practice, it is related to other practices. The debate about “empirical philosophy” forms a crucial episode in this debate, in which Krisis has explored analytical, existentialist, pragmatist and Marxist approaches to a philosophy as praxis. Since then, this debate has shifted along four dimensions, of science, culture, politics and economy. In conclusion, it is argued that the entanglement of the praxis of Krisis with these four other practices makes it difficult to identify what is philosophical about Krisis.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":38842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Krisis\",\"volume\":\"72 2 1\",\"pages\":\"48-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Krisis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.36975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.40.1.36975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《Krisis》作为一本当代哲学期刊,在其40年的创刊历程中,一直致力于发展一种新的哲学实践。在这里,这种实践首先被概述为制作期刊的实际工作,在哲学家社区讨论当代思想家的经典以及一系列共同问题的背景下。然而,除此之外,克里斯一直在努力解决这个问题,作为一种哲学实践,它是如何与其他实践相关联的。关于“经验哲学”的争论在这场辩论中形成了一个关键的情节,在这场辩论中,克里斯探索了分析主义、存在主义、实用主义和马克思主义的哲学实践方法。从那时起,这场辩论在科学、文化、政治和经济四个方面发生了变化。综上所述,本文认为,Krisis的实践与这四种其他实践的纠缠使得很难确定Krisis的哲学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Filosofie als praktijk. Krisis na 40 jaar
In its forty years of existence, Krisis, as a journal of contemporary philosophy, has aimed to develop a new philosophical praxis. This praxis is sketched here in the first place as the practical work of making a journal, in the context of a community of philosophers discussing a canon of contemporary thinkers as well a range of shared problems. Yet beyond that, Krisis has always struggled with the question how, as a philosophical practice, it is related to other practices. The debate about “empirical philosophy” forms a crucial episode in this debate, in which Krisis has explored analytical, existentialist, pragmatist and Marxist approaches to a philosophy as praxis. Since then, this debate has shifted along four dimensions, of science, culture, politics and economy. In conclusion, it is argued that the entanglement of the praxis of Krisis with these four other practices makes it difficult to identify what is philosophical about Krisis.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Krisis
Krisis Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信