集成电路辐射发射的测量

R. R. Goulette
{"title":"集成电路辐射发射的测量","authors":"R. R. Goulette","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.1992.626105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Newer, larger integrated circuits are becoming significant sources of EMI, due to their higher clock speeds, greater dynamic current consumption, and increased size and complexity. This paper presents an approach for the measurement of radiated emissions potential at the component level, with the objective of quantitatively specifying the level of device emissions that will ensure compliance at the equipment level. Since many integrated circuit radiated emission effects depend upon near-field coupling, the problem is first examined in the light of magnetic and electric field measurements made in the immediate vicinity of the device. The prospect of using far-field measurement methods is also considered, and the relative merits of using both techniques are weighed. R = Radiated I. INTRODUCI~ON C = Conducted Fig. 1. Electromagnetic emission from integrated circuits. The design of telecommunications equipment for EMI compliance is currently hampered by a lack of relevant data on the emissions potential of commercial and custom electronic components. Newer, more complex devices such as 32-bit microprocessors, digital signal processors, and a variety of ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits) have appeared on the scene and represent an increasingly important source of electromagnetic energy. This is due to their higher clock speeds, greater dynamic current consumption, and increased size and complexity. Although these components will not normally fail the radiated emissions limits by themselves, the energy that they generate may excite resonant structures within electronic equipment, causing an EM1 problem. Figure 1 depicts the flow of both conducted and radiated energy from the integrated circuit (IC) into printed circuit board (PCB) and backplane structures, into enclosure cavities and onto connectors and cables. Each one of these elements contributes to the total energy radiated from the equipment. It is evident from this view that limiting the emissions from the device will control the emissions from the equipment. The problem that remains is to quantitatively specify the level of device emissions that will ensure emission compliance at the product level. The purpose of this paper is to propose that devices be characterized in terms of their equivalent magnetic and electric dipole moments, which will provide a measure of the potential for radiated emissions coupling. This is accomplished by representing an IC by a small loop antenna (magnetic dipole) and by a small dipole antenna (electric dipole). The magnetic dipole moment is simply the product of loop area and loop current, and the electric dipoie moment is the product of dipole length and current [I]. Measurement techniques to determine these parameters will be presented in the following sections. II. REASONS FOR REDUCING INTEGRATED ClRCUIT EMISSIONS Direct device radiated emissions are becoming more important in modem high-density high-speed circuitry since the use of ground planes and stripline minimize trace emission, leaving the elevated (2.5 mm typical) wiring within large IC devices as the dominant radiator. Additional benefits of controlling IC radiated emissions are that the device layout and circuit measures necessary to achieve this also tend to reduce package inductance, ground bounce, and conducted noise in general. It follows that the measurement of radiated emissions also provides an indication of some of the principal factors associated with device conducted noise, potentially by means of a single measurement of electric and magnetic fields. This contrasts with the need for conducted noise measurements on hundreds of pins for some of the newer ASICs, CH3169-0/92/0000-0067 $3.00 01992 IEEE 340 suggesting that effort to determine this correlation will be worthwhile. The subject of limits and techniques for direct measurement of conducted noise is not presented in this paper, as it has been widely treated in the literature [2],[3], and because the primary purpose of this effort is to control the radiated emissions contributions of the IC that cannot be effectively mitigated at the circuit pack level. DI. THE NEED FOR BOTH MAGNETIC AND ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENTS The EMC Engineer needs to h o w the near-field coupling potential of the IC if significant system coupling along the paths evident in Figure 1 is to be avoided. Near field refers to close-range coupling at distances less than about one sixth of a wavelength. For example, if an IC is mounted on a PCB inside of a metal enclosure, it is desireable to know both the electric and magnetic dipole moments in order to estimate cavity resonance effects. The new high-speed ASICs can emit significant fields up to and beyond one GHz, so this can apply even to small enclosures and structures such as heat-sink assemblies mounted over ground planes. At lower frequencies such as 30 MHz 300MHz, where ASIC-to-cable interface coupling effects may dominate, impedance conditions at the interface may favour magnetic or electric field coupling effects, and again it is desireable to know both characteristics. This suggests that a near-field measurement technique is necessary, at least in the early phases of data gathering. As the correlation between magnetic and electric near fields becomes better understood for different device structures, then one near-field measurementmay suffice. A far-field measurement could also be considered in this situation, but knowledge of near fields would be lost, and again some correlation between far-field and nearfield behaviour would have to emerge. In summary, it was decided to initially pursue near-field magnetic and electric field measurement techniques, and to periodically correlate these measurements with far-field tests of the IC. The near-field tests have the added advantage of being conducted in situ in actual circuit applications, minimizing the need for special fixturing and circuitry to exercise the IC. The development of the method is outlined in sections 4 and 5. Section VI outlines the use of a wideband TEM cell which could be used to obtain equivalent far-field characteristics as described in [4], or dipole moment characteristics as described in [5]. This method would be suitable for use by an IC manufacturer as the IC is tested in isolation inside of the shielded test cell and all extraneous drive circuitry is outside. Iv. THE DETERMINATION OF MAGNETIC DIFQLE MOMENT It is generally not possible or practical to make a direct measurement of the magnetic dipole moment of an IC. If the device consisted of one simple radiating loop, one could measure loop area and loop current, and multiply these quantities to obtain magnetic dipole moment. ICs are very complex sources of radiated fiields, and their magnetic dipole moments are not easily calculated. In very simple cases, a vector sum calculation of dipole moments could be performed if the magnitude and phase of all currents is known[6]. In initial trials, it was decided to infer the magnetic dipole moment from1 magnetic field measurements. A square 2x2 cm shielded loop was fabricated from 0.045 \" dia. semirigid coaxial cable. The general approach was to place the probe over the IC so that the plane of the loop was perpendicular to the plane of tlhe IC, as shown in Figure 2. At each frequency of interest, the spectrum analyzer reading in microvolts was recolrded. A calculation was then performed, which determined thle necessary current that must flow in a hypothetical half-loop substituted in place of the IC to p r e duce the Same specmum analyzer readings. For the purposes of the calculation, the half-loop length was made equal to the average distance between opposing IC pins, and the height was made qua l to the height of the device lead-frame above circuit board ground. The half-loop and the measuring loop are in the same plane. The product of the calculated current and twice the area of the half-loop gave the magnetic dipole moment, which was expressed in units of dB (uA-m2). This process was repeated at various probe orientations. Referring to Figure 2, measurements would typically be made in the x-z and y-z planes, at heights h, and h,.","PeriodicalId":93568,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility : [proceedings]. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":"51 1","pages":"340-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Measurement Of Radiated Emissions From Integrated Circuits\",\"authors\":\"R. R. Goulette\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISEMC.1992.626105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Newer, larger integrated circuits are becoming significant sources of EMI, due to their higher clock speeds, greater dynamic current consumption, and increased size and complexity. This paper presents an approach for the measurement of radiated emissions potential at the component level, with the objective of quantitatively specifying the level of device emissions that will ensure compliance at the equipment level. Since many integrated circuit radiated emission effects depend upon near-field coupling, the problem is first examined in the light of magnetic and electric field measurements made in the immediate vicinity of the device. The prospect of using far-field measurement methods is also considered, and the relative merits of using both techniques are weighed. R = Radiated I. INTRODUCI~ON C = Conducted Fig. 1. Electromagnetic emission from integrated circuits. The design of telecommunications equipment for EMI compliance is currently hampered by a lack of relevant data on the emissions potential of commercial and custom electronic components. Newer, more complex devices such as 32-bit microprocessors, digital signal processors, and a variety of ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits) have appeared on the scene and represent an increasingly important source of electromagnetic energy. This is due to their higher clock speeds, greater dynamic current consumption, and increased size and complexity. Although these components will not normally fail the radiated emissions limits by themselves, the energy that they generate may excite resonant structures within electronic equipment, causing an EM1 problem. Figure 1 depicts the flow of both conducted and radiated energy from the integrated circuit (IC) into printed circuit board (PCB) and backplane structures, into enclosure cavities and onto connectors and cables. Each one of these elements contributes to the total energy radiated from the equipment. It is evident from this view that limiting the emissions from the device will control the emissions from the equipment. The problem that remains is to quantitatively specify the level of device emissions that will ensure emission compliance at the product level. The purpose of this paper is to propose that devices be characterized in terms of their equivalent magnetic and electric dipole moments, which will provide a measure of the potential for radiated emissions coupling. This is accomplished by representing an IC by a small loop antenna (magnetic dipole) and by a small dipole antenna (electric dipole). The magnetic dipole moment is simply the product of loop area and loop current, and the electric dipoie moment is the product of dipole length and current [I]. Measurement techniques to determine these parameters will be presented in the following sections. II. REASONS FOR REDUCING INTEGRATED ClRCUIT EMISSIONS Direct device radiated emissions are becoming more important in modem high-density high-speed circuitry since the use of ground planes and stripline minimize trace emission, leaving the elevated (2.5 mm typical) wiring within large IC devices as the dominant radiator. Additional benefits of controlling IC radiated emissions are that the device layout and circuit measures necessary to achieve this also tend to reduce package inductance, ground bounce, and conducted noise in general. It follows that the measurement of radiated emissions also provides an indication of some of the principal factors associated with device conducted noise, potentially by means of a single measurement of electric and magnetic fields. This contrasts with the need for conducted noise measurements on hundreds of pins for some of the newer ASICs, CH3169-0/92/0000-0067 $3.00 01992 IEEE 340 suggesting that effort to determine this correlation will be worthwhile. The subject of limits and techniques for direct measurement of conducted noise is not presented in this paper, as it has been widely treated in the literature [2],[3], and because the primary purpose of this effort is to control the radiated emissions contributions of the IC that cannot be effectively mitigated at the circuit pack level. DI. THE NEED FOR BOTH MAGNETIC AND ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENTS The EMC Engineer needs to h o w the near-field coupling potential of the IC if significant system coupling along the paths evident in Figure 1 is to be avoided. Near field refers to close-range coupling at distances less than about one sixth of a wavelength. For example, if an IC is mounted on a PCB inside of a metal enclosure, it is desireable to know both the electric and magnetic dipole moments in order to estimate cavity resonance effects. The new high-speed ASICs can emit significant fields up to and beyond one GHz, so this can apply even to small enclosures and structures such as heat-sink assemblies mounted over ground planes. At lower frequencies such as 30 MHz 300MHz, where ASIC-to-cable interface coupling effects may dominate, impedance conditions at the interface may favour magnetic or electric field coupling effects, and again it is desireable to know both characteristics. This suggests that a near-field measurement technique is necessary, at least in the early phases of data gathering. As the correlation between magnetic and electric near fields becomes better understood for different device structures, then one near-field measurementmay suffice. A far-field measurement could also be considered in this situation, but knowledge of near fields would be lost, and again some correlation between far-field and nearfield behaviour would have to emerge. In summary, it was decided to initially pursue near-field magnetic and electric field measurement techniques, and to periodically correlate these measurements with far-field tests of the IC. The near-field tests have the added advantage of being conducted in situ in actual circuit applications, minimizing the need for special fixturing and circuitry to exercise the IC. The development of the method is outlined in sections 4 and 5. Section VI outlines the use of a wideband TEM cell which could be used to obtain equivalent far-field characteristics as described in [4], or dipole moment characteristics as described in [5]. This method would be suitable for use by an IC manufacturer as the IC is tested in isolation inside of the shielded test cell and all extraneous drive circuitry is outside. Iv. THE DETERMINATION OF MAGNETIC DIFQLE MOMENT It is generally not possible or practical to make a direct measurement of the magnetic dipole moment of an IC. If the device consisted of one simple radiating loop, one could measure loop area and loop current, and multiply these quantities to obtain magnetic dipole moment. ICs are very complex sources of radiated fiields, and their magnetic dipole moments are not easily calculated. In very simple cases, a vector sum calculation of dipole moments could be performed if the magnitude and phase of all currents is known[6]. In initial trials, it was decided to infer the magnetic dipole moment from1 magnetic field measurements. A square 2x2 cm shielded loop was fabricated from 0.045 \\\" dia. semirigid coaxial cable. The general approach was to place the probe over the IC so that the plane of the loop was perpendicular to the plane of tlhe IC, as shown in Figure 2. At each frequency of interest, the spectrum analyzer reading in microvolts was recolrded. A calculation was then performed, which determined thle necessary current that must flow in a hypothetical half-loop substituted in place of the IC to p r e duce the Same specmum analyzer readings. For the purposes of the calculation, the half-loop length was made equal to the average distance between opposing IC pins, and the height was made qua l to the height of the device lead-frame above circuit board ground. The half-loop and the measuring loop are in the same plane. The product of the calculated current and twice the area of the half-loop gave the magnetic dipole moment, which was expressed in units of dB (uA-m2). This process was repeated at various probe orientations. Referring to Figure 2, measurements would typically be made in the x-z and y-z planes, at heights h, and h,.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility : [proceedings]. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"340-345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility : [proceedings]. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1992.626105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility : [proceedings]. IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1992.626105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

由于更高的时钟速度、更大的动态电流消耗以及尺寸和复杂性的增加,更新、更大的集成电路正成为EMI的重要来源。本文提出了一种在组件水平上测量辐射发射电位的方法,目的是定量地指定设备发射水平,以确保在设备水平上符合要求。由于许多集成电路的辐射发射效应依赖于近场耦合,因此首先根据在器件附近进行的磁场和电场测量来检查这个问题。对远场测量方法的应用前景进行了展望,并对两种方法的优缺点进行了比较。R =辐射I. intri ~ON C =传导集成电路的电磁发射。目前,由于缺乏关于商业和定制电子元件的潜在排放的有关数据,使电信设备的设计不符合电磁干扰标准。更新,更复杂的设备,如32位微处理器,数字信号处理器和各种专用集成电路(asic)已经出现在现场,代表着越来越重要的电磁能量来源。这是由于它们更高的时钟速度,更大的动态电流消耗,以及增加的尺寸和复杂性。虽然这些组件本身通常不会超过辐射发射限制,但它们产生的能量可能会激发电子设备内的谐振结构,导致EM1问题。图1描述了从集成电路(IC)进入印刷电路板(PCB)和背板结构,进入外壳腔和连接器和电缆的传导和辐射能量的流动。这些元素中的每一个都对设备辐射的总能量有贡献。很明显,从这个观点来看,限制设备的排放将控制设备的排放。剩下的问题是定量地指定设备排放水平,以确保在产品水平上符合排放要求。本文的目的是提出用等效磁偶极矩和电偶极矩来表征器件,这将为辐射发射耦合的潜力提供一种度量。这是通过一个小的环形天线(磁偶极子)和一个小的偶极子天线(电偶极子)来表示一个集成电路来实现的。磁偶极矩是回路面积与回路电流的乘积,电偶极矩是偶极子长度与电流的乘积[I]。确定这些参数的测量技术将在以下章节中介绍。2直接器件辐射在现代高密度高速电路中变得越来越重要,因为地平面和带状线的使用最大限度地减少了痕量辐射,使大型IC器件内的高架(典型2.5毫米)布线成为主要的辐射体。控制IC辐射发射的额外好处是,实现这一目标所需的器件布局和电路措施也倾向于降低封装电感、地反弹和传导噪声。由此可见,辐射发射的测量也提供了与设备传导噪声有关的一些主要因素的指示,可能通过对电场和磁场的单一测量来实现。这与一些较新的asic需要对数百个引脚进行传导噪声测量形成鲜明对比,CH3169-0/92/0000-0067 $3.00 / 1992 IEEE 340表明,确定这种相关性的努力是值得的。本文没有提出直接测量传导噪声的限制和技术的主题,因为它已经在文献[2],[3]中得到了广泛的处理,并且因为这项工作的主要目的是控制IC的辐射发射贡献,而这些贡献不能在电路组级别有效地减轻。DI。磁偶极矩和电偶极矩的需求如果要避免沿着图1中明显的路径发生明显的系统耦合,EMC工程师需要了解IC的近场耦合电位。近场是指距离小于六分之一波长的近距离耦合。例如,如果集成电路安装在金属外壳内的PCB上,则需要知道电偶极矩和磁偶极矩,以便估计腔谐振效应。新的高速asic可以发射高达或超过1 GHz的显著场,因此这甚至可以应用于小型外壳和结构,例如安装在地平面上的散热器组件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Measurement Of Radiated Emissions From Integrated Circuits
Newer, larger integrated circuits are becoming significant sources of EMI, due to their higher clock speeds, greater dynamic current consumption, and increased size and complexity. This paper presents an approach for the measurement of radiated emissions potential at the component level, with the objective of quantitatively specifying the level of device emissions that will ensure compliance at the equipment level. Since many integrated circuit radiated emission effects depend upon near-field coupling, the problem is first examined in the light of magnetic and electric field measurements made in the immediate vicinity of the device. The prospect of using far-field measurement methods is also considered, and the relative merits of using both techniques are weighed. R = Radiated I. INTRODUCI~ON C = Conducted Fig. 1. Electromagnetic emission from integrated circuits. The design of telecommunications equipment for EMI compliance is currently hampered by a lack of relevant data on the emissions potential of commercial and custom electronic components. Newer, more complex devices such as 32-bit microprocessors, digital signal processors, and a variety of ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits) have appeared on the scene and represent an increasingly important source of electromagnetic energy. This is due to their higher clock speeds, greater dynamic current consumption, and increased size and complexity. Although these components will not normally fail the radiated emissions limits by themselves, the energy that they generate may excite resonant structures within electronic equipment, causing an EM1 problem. Figure 1 depicts the flow of both conducted and radiated energy from the integrated circuit (IC) into printed circuit board (PCB) and backplane structures, into enclosure cavities and onto connectors and cables. Each one of these elements contributes to the total energy radiated from the equipment. It is evident from this view that limiting the emissions from the device will control the emissions from the equipment. The problem that remains is to quantitatively specify the level of device emissions that will ensure emission compliance at the product level. The purpose of this paper is to propose that devices be characterized in terms of their equivalent magnetic and electric dipole moments, which will provide a measure of the potential for radiated emissions coupling. This is accomplished by representing an IC by a small loop antenna (magnetic dipole) and by a small dipole antenna (electric dipole). The magnetic dipole moment is simply the product of loop area and loop current, and the electric dipoie moment is the product of dipole length and current [I]. Measurement techniques to determine these parameters will be presented in the following sections. II. REASONS FOR REDUCING INTEGRATED ClRCUIT EMISSIONS Direct device radiated emissions are becoming more important in modem high-density high-speed circuitry since the use of ground planes and stripline minimize trace emission, leaving the elevated (2.5 mm typical) wiring within large IC devices as the dominant radiator. Additional benefits of controlling IC radiated emissions are that the device layout and circuit measures necessary to achieve this also tend to reduce package inductance, ground bounce, and conducted noise in general. It follows that the measurement of radiated emissions also provides an indication of some of the principal factors associated with device conducted noise, potentially by means of a single measurement of electric and magnetic fields. This contrasts with the need for conducted noise measurements on hundreds of pins for some of the newer ASICs, CH3169-0/92/0000-0067 $3.00 01992 IEEE 340 suggesting that effort to determine this correlation will be worthwhile. The subject of limits and techniques for direct measurement of conducted noise is not presented in this paper, as it has been widely treated in the literature [2],[3], and because the primary purpose of this effort is to control the radiated emissions contributions of the IC that cannot be effectively mitigated at the circuit pack level. DI. THE NEED FOR BOTH MAGNETIC AND ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENTS The EMC Engineer needs to h o w the near-field coupling potential of the IC if significant system coupling along the paths evident in Figure 1 is to be avoided. Near field refers to close-range coupling at distances less than about one sixth of a wavelength. For example, if an IC is mounted on a PCB inside of a metal enclosure, it is desireable to know both the electric and magnetic dipole moments in order to estimate cavity resonance effects. The new high-speed ASICs can emit significant fields up to and beyond one GHz, so this can apply even to small enclosures and structures such as heat-sink assemblies mounted over ground planes. At lower frequencies such as 30 MHz 300MHz, where ASIC-to-cable interface coupling effects may dominate, impedance conditions at the interface may favour magnetic or electric field coupling effects, and again it is desireable to know both characteristics. This suggests that a near-field measurement technique is necessary, at least in the early phases of data gathering. As the correlation between magnetic and electric near fields becomes better understood for different device structures, then one near-field measurementmay suffice. A far-field measurement could also be considered in this situation, but knowledge of near fields would be lost, and again some correlation between far-field and nearfield behaviour would have to emerge. In summary, it was decided to initially pursue near-field magnetic and electric field measurement techniques, and to periodically correlate these measurements with far-field tests of the IC. The near-field tests have the added advantage of being conducted in situ in actual circuit applications, minimizing the need for special fixturing and circuitry to exercise the IC. The development of the method is outlined in sections 4 and 5. Section VI outlines the use of a wideband TEM cell which could be used to obtain equivalent far-field characteristics as described in [4], or dipole moment characteristics as described in [5]. This method would be suitable for use by an IC manufacturer as the IC is tested in isolation inside of the shielded test cell and all extraneous drive circuitry is outside. Iv. THE DETERMINATION OF MAGNETIC DIFQLE MOMENT It is generally not possible or practical to make a direct measurement of the magnetic dipole moment of an IC. If the device consisted of one simple radiating loop, one could measure loop area and loop current, and multiply these quantities to obtain magnetic dipole moment. ICs are very complex sources of radiated fiields, and their magnetic dipole moments are not easily calculated. In very simple cases, a vector sum calculation of dipole moments could be performed if the magnitude and phase of all currents is known[6]. In initial trials, it was decided to infer the magnetic dipole moment from1 magnetic field measurements. A square 2x2 cm shielded loop was fabricated from 0.045 " dia. semirigid coaxial cable. The general approach was to place the probe over the IC so that the plane of the loop was perpendicular to the plane of tlhe IC, as shown in Figure 2. At each frequency of interest, the spectrum analyzer reading in microvolts was recolrded. A calculation was then performed, which determined thle necessary current that must flow in a hypothetical half-loop substituted in place of the IC to p r e duce the Same specmum analyzer readings. For the purposes of the calculation, the half-loop length was made equal to the average distance between opposing IC pins, and the height was made qua l to the height of the device lead-frame above circuit board ground. The half-loop and the measuring loop are in the same plane. The product of the calculated current and twice the area of the half-loop gave the magnetic dipole moment, which was expressed in units of dB (uA-m2). This process was repeated at various probe orientations. Referring to Figure 2, measurements would typically be made in the x-z and y-z planes, at heights h, and h,.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信