芳基取代异苯并呋喃-1(3H)- 1抑制剂的QSAR比较研究

Z. Rostami, E. Pourbasheer
{"title":"芳基取代异苯并呋喃-1(3H)- 1抑制剂的QSAR比较研究","authors":"Z. Rostami, E. Pourbasheer","doi":"10.33945/SAMI/ECC.2019.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative workflow, including linear and non-linear QSAR models, was carried out to evaluate the predictive accuracy of models and predict the inhibition activity of a series of aryl-substituted isobenzofuran-1(3H)-ones. The data set consisted of 34 compounds was classified into the training and test sets, randomly. Molecular descriptors were selected using the genetic algorithm (GA) as a feature selection tool. Various linear models based on multiple linear regression (MLR), principle component regression (PCR) and partial least square (PLS) and non-linear models based on artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and support vector machine (SVM) methods were developed and compared. The accuracy of the models was studied by leave-one-out cross-validation (Q_LOO^2), Y-randomization test and group of compounds as external test set. Six descriptors were selected by GA to develop predictive models. With respect to the linear models, GA-PCR method was more accurate than the reset with statistical results of 〖 R〗_train^2=0.883, R_test^2=0.897,〖 R〗_(adj,train)^2=0.829,〖 R〗_(adj,test)^2=0.849,〖 F〗_train=24.07 and F_test=34.17. In case of non-linear models, GA-SVM (R_train^2=0.992 and R_test^2=0.997) showed high predictive accuracy for the inhibitory activity. It was found that the selected descriptors have the major roles in interpretation of biological activities of the compounds.","PeriodicalId":14624,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Chemical Communication","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative QSAR study of aryl-substituted isobenzofuran-1(3H)-ones inhibitors\",\"authors\":\"Z. Rostami, E. Pourbasheer\",\"doi\":\"10.33945/SAMI/ECC.2019.1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparative workflow, including linear and non-linear QSAR models, was carried out to evaluate the predictive accuracy of models and predict the inhibition activity of a series of aryl-substituted isobenzofuran-1(3H)-ones. The data set consisted of 34 compounds was classified into the training and test sets, randomly. Molecular descriptors were selected using the genetic algorithm (GA) as a feature selection tool. Various linear models based on multiple linear regression (MLR), principle component regression (PCR) and partial least square (PLS) and non-linear models based on artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and support vector machine (SVM) methods were developed and compared. The accuracy of the models was studied by leave-one-out cross-validation (Q_LOO^2), Y-randomization test and group of compounds as external test set. Six descriptors were selected by GA to develop predictive models. With respect to the linear models, GA-PCR method was more accurate than the reset with statistical results of 〖 R〗_train^2=0.883, R_test^2=0.897,〖 R〗_(adj,train)^2=0.829,〖 R〗_(adj,test)^2=0.849,〖 F〗_train=24.07 and F_test=34.17. In case of non-linear models, GA-SVM (R_train^2=0.992 and R_test^2=0.997) showed high predictive accuracy for the inhibitory activity. It was found that the selected descriptors have the major roles in interpretation of biological activities of the compounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Chemical Communication\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Chemical Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33945/SAMI/ECC.2019.1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Chemical Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33945/SAMI/ECC.2019.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过比较线性和非线性QSAR模型,对模型的预测精度进行了评估,并对一系列芳基取代异苯并呋喃-1(3H)-的抑制活性进行了预测。数据集由34个化合物组成,随机分为训练集和测试集。采用遗传算法(GA)作为特征选择工具来选择分子描述符。建立并比较了基于多元线性回归(MLR)、主成分回归(PCR)和偏最小二乘(PLS)的各种线性模型,以及基于人工神经网络(ANN)、基于自适应网络的模糊推理系统(ANFIS)和支持向量机(SVM)方法的非线性模型。通过留一交叉验证(Q_LOO^2)、y随机化检验和化合物组作为外部测试集,研究了模型的准确性。通过遗传算法选择6个描述符建立预测模型。对于线性模型,GA-PCR法比重置法更准确,统计结果为〖R〗_train^2=0.883, R_test^2=0.897,〖R〗_(adj,train)^2=0.829,〖R〗_(adj,test)^2=0.849,〖F〗_train=24.07, F_test=34.17。在非线性模型下,GA-SVM (R_train^2=0.992和R_test^2=0.997)对抑制活性的预测准确率较高。结果表明,所选择的描述符在解释化合物的生物活性方面具有重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative QSAR study of aryl-substituted isobenzofuran-1(3H)-ones inhibitors
A comparative workflow, including linear and non-linear QSAR models, was carried out to evaluate the predictive accuracy of models and predict the inhibition activity of a series of aryl-substituted isobenzofuran-1(3H)-ones. The data set consisted of 34 compounds was classified into the training and test sets, randomly. Molecular descriptors were selected using the genetic algorithm (GA) as a feature selection tool. Various linear models based on multiple linear regression (MLR), principle component regression (PCR) and partial least square (PLS) and non-linear models based on artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and support vector machine (SVM) methods were developed and compared. The accuracy of the models was studied by leave-one-out cross-validation (Q_LOO^2), Y-randomization test and group of compounds as external test set. Six descriptors were selected by GA to develop predictive models. With respect to the linear models, GA-PCR method was more accurate than the reset with statistical results of 〖 R〗_train^2=0.883, R_test^2=0.897,〖 R〗_(adj,train)^2=0.829,〖 R〗_(adj,test)^2=0.849,〖 F〗_train=24.07 and F_test=34.17. In case of non-linear models, GA-SVM (R_train^2=0.992 and R_test^2=0.997) showed high predictive accuracy for the inhibitory activity. It was found that the selected descriptors have the major roles in interpretation of biological activities of the compounds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Chemical Communication
Iranian Chemical Communication CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信