{"title":"微经皮肾镜取石术(Microperc)和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)在肾盏下小肾结石治疗中的作用评价","authors":"Mohamed Yehiaa, M. Thangavelu","doi":"10.4172/2168-9857.1000206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Management of lower caliceal stones is challenging. Recent advances in technology have led to the implementation of micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) as well as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of lower caliceal kidney stones. Objective: Review of studies evaluating the role of RIRS and microperc techniques for the treatment of lower caliceal kidney stones. Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature review was performed in September 2017 using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Conclusion: Microperc and RIRS, both are valid options for the treatment of small lower caliceal stones in adult patients. The stone clearance rates in both microperc and RIRS are comparably high and the complication rates are comparably low. Microperc is associated with more post-operative pain and more fall in the haemoglobin level while RIRS is associated with more intraoperative DJ insertion.","PeriodicalId":89536,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medical & surgical urology","volume":"46 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Role of Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) in the Management of Small Lower Caliceal Kidney Stones\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Yehiaa, M. Thangavelu\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2168-9857.1000206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Management of lower caliceal stones is challenging. Recent advances in technology have led to the implementation of micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) as well as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of lower caliceal kidney stones. Objective: Review of studies evaluating the role of RIRS and microperc techniques for the treatment of lower caliceal kidney stones. Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature review was performed in September 2017 using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Conclusion: Microperc and RIRS, both are valid options for the treatment of small lower caliceal stones in adult patients. The stone clearance rates in both microperc and RIRS are comparably high and the complication rates are comparably low. Microperc is associated with more post-operative pain and more fall in the haemoglobin level while RIRS is associated with more intraoperative DJ insertion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of medical & surgical urology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of medical & surgical urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9857.1000206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medical & surgical urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9857.1000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:下盏结石的治疗具有挑战性。最近的技术进步已经导致实施微经皮肾镜取石术(microperc)以及逆行肾内手术(RIRS)在肾盏下肾结石的管理。目的:综述RIRS和微量钙技术在肾盏下肾结石治疗中的作用。证据获取:2017年9月,使用PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行了系统的文献综述,以确定相关研究。结论:微钙石和RIRS是治疗成人肾盏下小结石的有效选择。微量和RIRS的结石清除率都相对较高,并发症发生率相对较低。Microperc与更多的术后疼痛和血红蛋白水平下降相关,而RIRS与更多的术中DJ插入相关。
Evaluation of the Role of Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) in the Management of Small Lower Caliceal Kidney Stones
Introduction: Management of lower caliceal stones is challenging. Recent advances in technology have led to the implementation of micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) as well as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of lower caliceal kidney stones. Objective: Review of studies evaluating the role of RIRS and microperc techniques for the treatment of lower caliceal kidney stones. Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature review was performed in September 2017 using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Conclusion: Microperc and RIRS, both are valid options for the treatment of small lower caliceal stones in adult patients. The stone clearance rates in both microperc and RIRS are comparably high and the complication rates are comparably low. Microperc is associated with more post-operative pain and more fall in the haemoglobin level while RIRS is associated with more intraoperative DJ insertion.