基础物理课程数字化评价:运用数字化评价的需求分析

N. Nurlina, D. H. Marisda, R. Riskawati, A. D. Sultan, S. Sukmawati, A. Akram
{"title":"基础物理课程数字化评价:运用数字化评价的需求分析","authors":"N. Nurlina, D. H. Marisda, R. Riskawati, A. D. Sultan, S. Sukmawati, A. Akram","doi":"10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment is essential to measure students' achievement of learning objectives. Assessments in Basic physics courses are still categorized as manual, unstructured, and outdated. Using descriptive statistics, this study aims to investigate the need for digital assessments in Basic physics courses. The samples were taken from two public universities, two private universities, and a university with Physics Education Study Programs. They were half of each university students’ number per class. The number of respondents from Public university A, Public university B, Private University C, Private University D, and University E were 91, 49, 25, 20, and 29 students, respectively. Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire via a google form. Data obtained was analyzed by calculating the percentage for each indicator. Research indicators consist of the availability of teaching materials, the application of blended models, students' interest in basic physics, and the availability of assessments of the physics learning process. The results show that the five institutions that provide Basic Physics courses have not implemented digital assessments optimally. Of the five tertiary institutions that became the research sample, only one institution achieved the minimum target, with a score of 55.31% in the class of 2021 at university A. Meanwhile, the other four tertiary institutions did not achieve 50% in the last five batches. Therefore, lecturers must develop digital assessments in basic physics courses using the Kahoot application.","PeriodicalId":37652,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment on Digitalization of Basic Physics Courses: Need Analysis on the Use of Digital-based Assessment\",\"authors\":\"N. Nurlina, D. H. Marisda, R. Riskawati, A. D. Sultan, S. Sukmawati, A. Akram\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessment is essential to measure students' achievement of learning objectives. Assessments in Basic physics courses are still categorized as manual, unstructured, and outdated. Using descriptive statistics, this study aims to investigate the need for digital assessments in Basic physics courses. The samples were taken from two public universities, two private universities, and a university with Physics Education Study Programs. They were half of each university students’ number per class. The number of respondents from Public university A, Public university B, Private University C, Private University D, and University E were 91, 49, 25, 20, and 29 students, respectively. Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire via a google form. Data obtained was analyzed by calculating the percentage for each indicator. Research indicators consist of the availability of teaching materials, the application of blended models, students' interest in basic physics, and the availability of assessments of the physics learning process. The results show that the five institutions that provide Basic Physics courses have not implemented digital assessments optimally. Of the five tertiary institutions that became the research sample, only one institution achieved the minimum target, with a score of 55.31% in the class of 2021 at university A. Meanwhile, the other four tertiary institutions did not achieve 50% in the last five batches. Therefore, lecturers must develop digital assessments in basic physics courses using the Kahoot application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

评价是衡量学生学习目标实现情况的必要手段。基础物理课程的评估仍然是手工的、非结构化的和过时的。本研究采用描述性统计方法,旨在探讨数位评量在基础物理课程中的必要性。样本取自两所公立大学、两所私立大学和一所设有物理教育研究项目的大学。他们是每所大学每班学生人数的一半。公立大学A、公立大学B、私立大学C、私立大学D、私立大学E的学生人数分别为91人、49人、25人、20人、29人。数据收集是通过谷歌表格进行问卷调查。通过计算每个指标的百分比来分析所获得的数据。研究指标包括教材的可用性、混合模型的应用、学生对基础物理的兴趣以及物理学习过程评估的可用性。结果表明,开设基础物理课程的五所院校在实施数字化评估方面表现不佳。在成为研究样本的五所高等院校中,只有一所达到了最低目标,即在大学a级2021级的得分为55.31%。同时,其他四所高等院校在过去的五批中都没有达到50%。因此,讲师必须在基础物理课程中使用Kahoot应用程序开发数字评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment on Digitalization of Basic Physics Courses: Need Analysis on the Use of Digital-based Assessment
Assessment is essential to measure students' achievement of learning objectives. Assessments in Basic physics courses are still categorized as manual, unstructured, and outdated. Using descriptive statistics, this study aims to investigate the need for digital assessments in Basic physics courses. The samples were taken from two public universities, two private universities, and a university with Physics Education Study Programs. They were half of each university students’ number per class. The number of respondents from Public university A, Public university B, Private University C, Private University D, and University E were 91, 49, 25, 20, and 29 students, respectively. Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire via a google form. Data obtained was analyzed by calculating the percentage for each indicator. Research indicators consist of the availability of teaching materials, the application of blended models, students' interest in basic physics, and the availability of assessments of the physics learning process. The results show that the five institutions that provide Basic Physics courses have not implemented digital assessments optimally. Of the five tertiary institutions that became the research sample, only one institution achieved the minimum target, with a score of 55.31% in the class of 2021 at university A. Meanwhile, the other four tertiary institutions did not achieve 50% in the last five batches. Therefore, lecturers must develop digital assessments in basic physics courses using the Kahoot application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy, and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. Moreover, this journal also covers the issues concerned with environmental education & environmental science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信