新型口服降糖药的不良反应监测-药物警戒的观点

Ankita Bhattacharjee, M. Gupta, S. Agrawal
{"title":"新型口服降糖药的不良反应监测-药物警戒的观点","authors":"Ankita Bhattacharjee, M. Gupta, S. Agrawal","doi":"10.7439/IJPR.V6I4.3068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To monitor and evaluate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of newer oral anti-diabetic drugs in type II diabetics by spontaneous/solicited ADR monitoring. Material and methods: Two hundred and thirty two diabetic patients on newer oral antidiabetic drugs were evaluated prospectively in a cross-sectional study over a period of eighteen months. All patients were followed up for ADRs which were evaluated for incidence, frequency, severity and causality. ADR severity was graded according to University of Virginia Health System Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting program criteria and causality assessment was done using WHO-UMC scale. Results: 190 out of 232 patients (42 patients lost to follow up) were evaluated. ADRs were observed in 34 cases (17.9%). Most common ADRs were gastrointestinal (44.2%) followed by musculoskeletal (17.6%), metabolic (14.7%), infections (5.9%) and others (17.6%). The maximal frequency of ADRs was seen with sitagliptin (6.4%) followed by vildagliptin(3.8%), saxagliptin(2.7%), saroglitazar(2.1%), linagliptin(1.6%), canagliflozin(1.6%). 25(73.5%), 8(23.5%) and 1(3%) ADRs were mild, moderate and severe respectively. 24(70%) ADRs were classified as possible, 9(27%) probable and 1(3%) unlikely on causality assessment.  Conclusion : Newer oral antidiabetic drugs like gliptins and SGLT-2 inhibitors have potential to cause ADRs. Gastro-intestinal, musculoskeletal, metabolic were most common ADRs. Active pharmacovigilance should be carried out for risk identification and management.","PeriodicalId":14194,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacological Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"142-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse drug reaction monitoring of newer oral anti-diabetic drugs - A pharmacovigilance perspective\",\"authors\":\"Ankita Bhattacharjee, M. Gupta, S. Agrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.7439/IJPR.V6I4.3068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To monitor and evaluate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of newer oral anti-diabetic drugs in type II diabetics by spontaneous/solicited ADR monitoring. Material and methods: Two hundred and thirty two diabetic patients on newer oral antidiabetic drugs were evaluated prospectively in a cross-sectional study over a period of eighteen months. All patients were followed up for ADRs which were evaluated for incidence, frequency, severity and causality. ADR severity was graded according to University of Virginia Health System Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting program criteria and causality assessment was done using WHO-UMC scale. Results: 190 out of 232 patients (42 patients lost to follow up) were evaluated. ADRs were observed in 34 cases (17.9%). Most common ADRs were gastrointestinal (44.2%) followed by musculoskeletal (17.6%), metabolic (14.7%), infections (5.9%) and others (17.6%). The maximal frequency of ADRs was seen with sitagliptin (6.4%) followed by vildagliptin(3.8%), saxagliptin(2.7%), saroglitazar(2.1%), linagliptin(1.6%), canagliflozin(1.6%). 25(73.5%), 8(23.5%) and 1(3%) ADRs were mild, moderate and severe respectively. 24(70%) ADRs were classified as possible, 9(27%) probable and 1(3%) unlikely on causality assessment.  Conclusion : Newer oral antidiabetic drugs like gliptins and SGLT-2 inhibitors have potential to cause ADRs. Gastro-intestinal, musculoskeletal, metabolic were most common ADRs. Active pharmacovigilance should be carried out for risk identification and management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmacological Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"142-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmacological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJPR.V6I4.3068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJPR.V6I4.3068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:通过自发/主动监测,监测和评价新型口服降糖药在II型糖尿病患者中的不良反应(ADR)。材料和方法:在一项为期18个月的横断面研究中,对232名服用新型口服降糖药的糖尿病患者进行前瞻性评估。对所有患者进行不良反应的随访,评估其发生率、频率、严重程度和因果关系。根据弗吉尼亚大学卫生系统药物不良反应报告规划标准对不良反应严重程度进行分级,并使用WHO-UMC量表进行因果关系评估。结果:232例患者中有190例(失访42例)得到评估。不良反应34例(17.9%)。最常见的不良反应是胃肠道(44.2%),其次是肌肉骨骼(17.6%)、代谢(14.7%)、感染(5.9%)和其他(17.6%)。不良反应发生率最高的是西格列汀(6.4%),其次是维格列汀(3.8%)、沙格列汀(2.7%)、沙格列他(2.1%)、利格列汀(1.6%)、卡格列净(1.6%)。轻度adr 25例(73.5%),中度adr 8例(23.5%),重度adr 1例(3%)。在因果关系评估中,24例(70%)adr被归类为可能,9例(27%)为可能,1例(3%)为不可能。结论:新型口服降糖药如格列汀和SGLT-2抑制剂可能引起不良反应。胃肠道、肌肉骨骼、代谢是最常见的不良反应。应开展积极的药物警戒,以识别和管理风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse drug reaction monitoring of newer oral anti-diabetic drugs - A pharmacovigilance perspective
Objective: To monitor and evaluate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of newer oral anti-diabetic drugs in type II diabetics by spontaneous/solicited ADR monitoring. Material and methods: Two hundred and thirty two diabetic patients on newer oral antidiabetic drugs were evaluated prospectively in a cross-sectional study over a period of eighteen months. All patients were followed up for ADRs which were evaluated for incidence, frequency, severity and causality. ADR severity was graded according to University of Virginia Health System Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting program criteria and causality assessment was done using WHO-UMC scale. Results: 190 out of 232 patients (42 patients lost to follow up) were evaluated. ADRs were observed in 34 cases (17.9%). Most common ADRs were gastrointestinal (44.2%) followed by musculoskeletal (17.6%), metabolic (14.7%), infections (5.9%) and others (17.6%). The maximal frequency of ADRs was seen with sitagliptin (6.4%) followed by vildagliptin(3.8%), saxagliptin(2.7%), saroglitazar(2.1%), linagliptin(1.6%), canagliflozin(1.6%). 25(73.5%), 8(23.5%) and 1(3%) ADRs were mild, moderate and severe respectively. 24(70%) ADRs were classified as possible, 9(27%) probable and 1(3%) unlikely on causality assessment.  Conclusion : Newer oral antidiabetic drugs like gliptins and SGLT-2 inhibitors have potential to cause ADRs. Gastro-intestinal, musculoskeletal, metabolic were most common ADRs. Active pharmacovigilance should be carried out for risk identification and management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信