小切口白内障手术中局部镇痛或球后麻醉对焦虑和疼痛的前瞻性评价

Per Julius Nielsen
{"title":"小切口白内障手术中局部镇痛或球后麻醉对焦虑和疼痛的前瞻性评价","authors":"Per Julius Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80023-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Objective: Comparing pre/per/postoperative pain and anxiety in cataract patients operated in either retrobulbar (RBA) or topical anaesthesia (TA). Study Design: Patients with uncomplicated bilateral small incision cataract surgery at short intervals were allocated to either TA or RBA and followed prospectively. Setting: Eye Department, Hjørring Hospital, Denmark. Patients: Sixteen patients or 32 eyes were operated, with 6 having TA first and 10 RBA first. Main Outcome Measures: Pre/per and postoperative pain and anxiety were evaluated using verbal descriptive as well as visual analogue scoring, and the patient's reason for preferring one anaesthetic method to the other were registrated. RESULTS: Ten patients preferred TA, 1 RBA and 5 had no preference. TA was rated 4 times less painful for the whole procedure than RBA with comparative scoring made after both eyes had been operated. The reasons for preferring TA were immediate vision (9), no patch (6), no periocular injection (5) and less pain (3). Most pain was estimated in the preoperative and postoperative periods with 4 times more pain estimated in the RBA than in the TA group, whereas no difference was estimated during surgery. The TA/RBA ratios of ‘no pain’ were preop: 16/7; perop: 13/14; postop: 14/11. Anxiety was most pronounced in the preoperative period with RBA (4 times), peroperatively with TA (twice), and with no difference between the 2 anaesthetic groups postoperatively. The TA/RBA ratios of ‘no anxiety’ were preop: 13/9; perop: 11/11; postop: 13/15. The TA/RBA ratios of sedation were preop (perorally): 11/8 and perop (intraveneously): 1/0. Analgesics were not needed in any of the anaesthetic groups during the first 24 h. Conclusions: TA is made possible by the use of modern small incision cataract surgical technique and was introduced to reduce the risks of periocular injections with current local anaesthetic techniques. TA is, as shown in this study, also preferred by the patients as it results in less pain and anxiety, especially by eliminating the need for a periocular injection, and due to the immediate visual recovery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100500,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80023-8","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Evaluation of Anxiety and Pain with Topical Analgesia or Retrobulbar Anaesthesia for Small Incision Cataract Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Per Julius Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80023-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Objective: Comparing pre/per/postoperative pain and anxiety in cataract patients operated in either retrobulbar (RBA) or topical anaesthesia (TA). Study Design: Patients with uncomplicated bilateral small incision cataract surgery at short intervals were allocated to either TA or RBA and followed prospectively. Setting: Eye Department, Hjørring Hospital, Denmark. Patients: Sixteen patients or 32 eyes were operated, with 6 having TA first and 10 RBA first. Main Outcome Measures: Pre/per and postoperative pain and anxiety were evaluated using verbal descriptive as well as visual analogue scoring, and the patient's reason for preferring one anaesthetic method to the other were registrated. RESULTS: Ten patients preferred TA, 1 RBA and 5 had no preference. TA was rated 4 times less painful for the whole procedure than RBA with comparative scoring made after both eyes had been operated. The reasons for preferring TA were immediate vision (9), no patch (6), no periocular injection (5) and less pain (3). Most pain was estimated in the preoperative and postoperative periods with 4 times more pain estimated in the RBA than in the TA group, whereas no difference was estimated during surgery. The TA/RBA ratios of ‘no pain’ were preop: 16/7; perop: 13/14; postop: 14/11. Anxiety was most pronounced in the preoperative period with RBA (4 times), peroperatively with TA (twice), and with no difference between the 2 anaesthetic groups postoperatively. The TA/RBA ratios of ‘no anxiety’ were preop: 13/9; perop: 11/11; postop: 13/15. The TA/RBA ratios of sedation were preop (perorally): 11/8 and perop (intraveneously): 1/0. Analgesics were not needed in any of the anaesthetic groups during the first 24 h. Conclusions: TA is made possible by the use of modern small incision cataract surgical technique and was introduced to reduce the risks of periocular injections with current local anaesthetic techniques. TA is, as shown in this study, also preferred by the patients as it results in less pain and anxiety, especially by eliminating the need for a periocular injection, and due to the immediate visual recovery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 6-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80023-8\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113800238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113800238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

目的:比较球后麻醉(RBA)和表面麻醉(TA)白内障手术患者术前、术中、术后的疼痛和焦虑。研究设计:短间隔无并发症的双侧小切口白内障手术患者被分配到TA或RBA,并进行前瞻性随访。单位:丹麦jj ørring医院眼科。患者:16例32眼,TA先行6例,RBA先行10例。主要结果测量:术前/术后和术后疼痛和焦虑用语言描述和视觉模拟评分进行评估,并记录患者选择一种麻醉方法的原因。结果:10例患者偏好TA, 1例RBA, 5例无偏好。在双眼手术后,TA比RBA在整个手术过程中疼痛减轻了4倍。首选TA的原因是即时视力(9),无贴片(6),无眼周注射(5)和疼痛较少(3)。大多数疼痛是在术前和术后估计的,RBA组估计的疼痛是TA组的4倍,而手术期间估计的疼痛没有差异。“无疼痛”的TA/RBA比值为:16/7;perop: 13/14;postop: 14/11。焦虑在术前RBA组(4次)和术中TA组(2次)最为明显,术后两组间无差异。“无焦虑”的TA/RBA比值为:13/9;perop: 11/11;postop: 13/15。镇静的TA/RBA比值为术前(经口):11/8,术后(静脉):1/0。结论:现代小切口白内障手术技术的应用使TA成为可能,并降低了当前局部麻醉技术下眼周注射的风险。正如本研究所示,TA也是患者的首选,因为它可以减少疼痛和焦虑,特别是不需要眼周注射,而且视力可以立即恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Prospective Evaluation of Anxiety and Pain with Topical Analgesia or Retrobulbar Anaesthesia for Small Incision Cataract Surgery

Objective: Comparing pre/per/postoperative pain and anxiety in cataract patients operated in either retrobulbar (RBA) or topical anaesthesia (TA). Study Design: Patients with uncomplicated bilateral small incision cataract surgery at short intervals were allocated to either TA or RBA and followed prospectively. Setting: Eye Department, Hjørring Hospital, Denmark. Patients: Sixteen patients or 32 eyes were operated, with 6 having TA first and 10 RBA first. Main Outcome Measures: Pre/per and postoperative pain and anxiety were evaluated using verbal descriptive as well as visual analogue scoring, and the patient's reason for preferring one anaesthetic method to the other were registrated. RESULTS: Ten patients preferred TA, 1 RBA and 5 had no preference. TA was rated 4 times less painful for the whole procedure than RBA with comparative scoring made after both eyes had been operated. The reasons for preferring TA were immediate vision (9), no patch (6), no periocular injection (5) and less pain (3). Most pain was estimated in the preoperative and postoperative periods with 4 times more pain estimated in the RBA than in the TA group, whereas no difference was estimated during surgery. The TA/RBA ratios of ‘no pain’ were preop: 16/7; perop: 13/14; postop: 14/11. Anxiety was most pronounced in the preoperative period with RBA (4 times), peroperatively with TA (twice), and with no difference between the 2 anaesthetic groups postoperatively. The TA/RBA ratios of ‘no anxiety’ were preop: 13/9; perop: 11/11; postop: 13/15. The TA/RBA ratios of sedation were preop (perorally): 11/8 and perop (intraveneously): 1/0. Analgesics were not needed in any of the anaesthetic groups during the first 24 h. Conclusions: TA is made possible by the use of modern small incision cataract surgical technique and was introduced to reduce the risks of periocular injections with current local anaesthetic techniques. TA is, as shown in this study, also preferred by the patients as it results in less pain and anxiety, especially by eliminating the need for a periocular injection, and due to the immediate visual recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信