追踪互联网路径透明度

M. Kühlewind, Michael Walter, Iain R. Learmonth, B. Trammell
{"title":"追踪互联网路径透明度","authors":"M. Kühlewind, Michael Walter, Iain R. Learmonth, B. Trammell","doi":"10.23919/TMA.2018.8506532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigating Internet Path Transparency means measuring if a network path between two endhosts is impaired by in-network functions on the path. A path is considered transparent if it provides connectivity and the same performance independent of the protocol or protocol stack that is used for the transmission. Unfortunately this is not always the case. Simple firewalls that block e.g. UDP, are an example. Of course such in-network functions are often valuable, like firewalls. However, these middleboxes also, sometimes unintentionally, make assumptions about the traffic passing through them that restricts innovation in the Internet on the higher layers, e.g. the deployment of new UDP-based protocols such as QUIC, to stick with the previous example. PATHspider is an active measurement tool to test for Path Transparency. In this paper we present a new feature of PATH-spider that integrates tracebox-based functionality and analysis to not only detect in-transparency but also further locate the origin of the impairment observed. As an example study we show updated and extended measurements on ECN support and connectivity. By using our enhanced ECN PATHspider plugin to test network support of the ECN IP codepoint and additional path tracing that is correlated with DSCP testing, we show that most in-network ECN IP codepoint zeroing is due to use of the deprecated definition of the IP ToS field for domain-internal service differentiation, while pure resetting of the ECN IP field is more likely an active inference in border networks.","PeriodicalId":6607,"journal":{"name":"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing Internet Path Transparency\",\"authors\":\"M. Kühlewind, Michael Walter, Iain R. Learmonth, B. Trammell\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/TMA.2018.8506532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Investigating Internet Path Transparency means measuring if a network path between two endhosts is impaired by in-network functions on the path. A path is considered transparent if it provides connectivity and the same performance independent of the protocol or protocol stack that is used for the transmission. Unfortunately this is not always the case. Simple firewalls that block e.g. UDP, are an example. Of course such in-network functions are often valuable, like firewalls. However, these middleboxes also, sometimes unintentionally, make assumptions about the traffic passing through them that restricts innovation in the Internet on the higher layers, e.g. the deployment of new UDP-based protocols such as QUIC, to stick with the previous example. PATHspider is an active measurement tool to test for Path Transparency. In this paper we present a new feature of PATH-spider that integrates tracebox-based functionality and analysis to not only detect in-transparency but also further locate the origin of the impairment observed. As an example study we show updated and extended measurements on ECN support and connectivity. By using our enhanced ECN PATHspider plugin to test network support of the ECN IP codepoint and additional path tracing that is correlated with DSCP testing, we show that most in-network ECN IP codepoint zeroing is due to use of the deprecated definition of the IP ToS field for domain-internal service differentiation, while pure resetting of the ECN IP field is more likely an active inference in border networks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/TMA.2018.8506532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/TMA.2018.8506532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

调查互联网路径透明度意味着测量两个终端主机之间的网络路径是否受到路径上网络内功能的损害。如果一个路径独立于用于传输的协议或协议栈提供连接和相同的性能,则该路径被认为是透明的。不幸的是,情况并非总是如此。简单的防火墙,如UDP,就是一个例子。当然,这种网络内功能通常是有价值的,比如防火墙。然而,这些中间件有时也会无意中对通过它们的流量做出假设,从而限制了互联网在更高层的创新,例如,为了坚持前面的例子,部署新的基于udp的协议(如QUIC)。PATHspider是一个用于测试路径透明度的主动测量工具。在本文中,我们提出了PATH-spider的一个新特性,它集成了基于tracebox的功能和分析,不仅可以检测不透明,还可以进一步定位所观察到的损伤的来源。作为一个示例研究,我们展示了更新和扩展的ECN支持和连通性测量。通过使用我们增强的ECN PATHspider插件来测试ECN IP码点的网络支持以及与DSCP测试相关的额外路径跟踪,我们表明,大多数网络内ECN IP码点归零是由于使用了已弃用的IP ToS字段定义来进行域内部服务区分,而ECN IP字段的纯粹重置更可能是边界网络中的主动推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracing Internet Path Transparency
Investigating Internet Path Transparency means measuring if a network path between two endhosts is impaired by in-network functions on the path. A path is considered transparent if it provides connectivity and the same performance independent of the protocol or protocol stack that is used for the transmission. Unfortunately this is not always the case. Simple firewalls that block e.g. UDP, are an example. Of course such in-network functions are often valuable, like firewalls. However, these middleboxes also, sometimes unintentionally, make assumptions about the traffic passing through them that restricts innovation in the Internet on the higher layers, e.g. the deployment of new UDP-based protocols such as QUIC, to stick with the previous example. PATHspider is an active measurement tool to test for Path Transparency. In this paper we present a new feature of PATH-spider that integrates tracebox-based functionality and analysis to not only detect in-transparency but also further locate the origin of the impairment observed. As an example study we show updated and extended measurements on ECN support and connectivity. By using our enhanced ECN PATHspider plugin to test network support of the ECN IP codepoint and additional path tracing that is correlated with DSCP testing, we show that most in-network ECN IP codepoint zeroing is due to use of the deprecated definition of the IP ToS field for domain-internal service differentiation, while pure resetting of the ECN IP field is more likely an active inference in border networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信