澳大利亚堕胎的法律和非法律障碍:证据综述

C. de Moel-Mandel, J. Shelley
{"title":"澳大利亚堕胎的法律和非法律障碍:证据综述","authors":"C. de Moel-Mandel, J. Shelley","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2016.1276162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: In Australia, about one in four pregnancies results in an induced abortion. The termination of a pregnancy is still, however, a criminal act in most jurisdictions, and access to abortion is not without barriers. This paper analyses existing access barriers and their implications. Methods: Databases and the grey literature were searched for publications that examined any legal and/or non-legal abortion access barrier applicable to Australia (2000–2016). Only those barriers that had been demonstrated to be the most restrictive were included and categorised. Results: From the initial 410 studies, only 20 publications were identified that matched the inclusion criteria. They indicated that access barriers do indeed exist in Australia. In many parts of Australia, abortion is only legal under strict conditions. Relatively strong evidence was found on the limited abortion access of rural women and of an imminent shortage in the provision of late abortions. For other barriers only limited research evidence existed, or merely opinions were expressed. Very few studies were undertaken to link barriers to outcomes. Conclusion: Although this review can form a base for the national improvement of abortion access, the gap found in Australian research demonstrates a need for additional studies.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"31 1","pages":"114 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The legal and non-legal barriers to abortion access in Australia: a review of the evidence\",\"authors\":\"C. de Moel-Mandel, J. Shelley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2016.1276162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives: In Australia, about one in four pregnancies results in an induced abortion. The termination of a pregnancy is still, however, a criminal act in most jurisdictions, and access to abortion is not without barriers. This paper analyses existing access barriers and their implications. Methods: Databases and the grey literature were searched for publications that examined any legal and/or non-legal abortion access barrier applicable to Australia (2000–2016). Only those barriers that had been demonstrated to be the most restrictive were included and categorised. Results: From the initial 410 studies, only 20 publications were identified that matched the inclusion criteria. They indicated that access barriers do indeed exist in Australia. In many parts of Australia, abortion is only legal under strict conditions. Relatively strong evidence was found on the limited abortion access of rural women and of an imminent shortage in the provision of late abortions. For other barriers only limited research evidence existed, or merely opinions were expressed. Very few studies were undertaken to link barriers to outcomes. Conclusion: Although this review can form a base for the national improvement of abortion access, the gap found in Australian research demonstrates a need for additional studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"114 - 122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1276162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1276162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

摘要目的:在澳大利亚,大约四分之一的怀孕导致人工流产。然而,在大多数司法管辖区,终止妊娠仍然是一种犯罪行为,堕胎并非没有障碍。本文分析了现有的准入障碍及其影响。方法:检索数据库和灰色文献,检索适用于澳大利亚(2000-2016年)的任何合法和/或非合法堕胎准入障碍的出版物。只有那些被证明是最具限制性的障碍才被列入和分类。结果:从最初的410项研究中,只有20篇出版物符合纳入标准。他们指出,准入障碍在澳大利亚确实存在。在澳大利亚的许多地方,堕胎只有在严格的条件下才合法。相对有力的证据表明,农村妇女获得堕胎的机会有限,晚期堕胎的供应即将短缺。对于其他障碍,只有有限的研究证据存在,或者仅仅表达了意见。很少进行将障碍与结果联系起来的研究。结论:虽然这篇综述可以为全国范围内堕胎准入的改善奠定基础,但澳大利亚研究中发现的差距表明需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The legal and non-legal barriers to abortion access in Australia: a review of the evidence
Abstract Objectives: In Australia, about one in four pregnancies results in an induced abortion. The termination of a pregnancy is still, however, a criminal act in most jurisdictions, and access to abortion is not without barriers. This paper analyses existing access barriers and their implications. Methods: Databases and the grey literature were searched for publications that examined any legal and/or non-legal abortion access barrier applicable to Australia (2000–2016). Only those barriers that had been demonstrated to be the most restrictive were included and categorised. Results: From the initial 410 studies, only 20 publications were identified that matched the inclusion criteria. They indicated that access barriers do indeed exist in Australia. In many parts of Australia, abortion is only legal under strict conditions. Relatively strong evidence was found on the limited abortion access of rural women and of an imminent shortage in the provision of late abortions. For other barriers only limited research evidence existed, or merely opinions were expressed. Very few studies were undertaken to link barriers to outcomes. Conclusion: Although this review can form a base for the national improvement of abortion access, the gap found in Australian research demonstrates a need for additional studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信