呈现历史内容:一种被忽视的实践的探究联系

David J. Neumann
{"title":"呈现历史内容:一种被忽视的实践的探究联系","authors":"David J. Neumann","doi":"10.1080/00377996.2021.1896985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the last three decades, history education has focused overwhelmingly on inquiry. In teacher education, the recent turn to “Core Practices” or “High-Leverage Practices” (HLPs) has been applied to history education. Despite the attractiveness of inquiry-oriented instruction, it is still absent from far too many history classrooms. One major obstacle to implementation is the disregard for Presenting Historical Content as a core practice. Rather than dismissing “direct practice” as a self-evident practice, we should give it the same careful analysis accorded other HLPs. Used thoughtfully, Presenting Historical Content serves an essential pedagogical purpose in inquiry instruction: framing student investigation and providing the context necessary for high-level student work. The article begins by exploring the centrality of background knowledge for meaningful inquiry and then explores what happens when such knowledge is absent from secondary classroom instruction. The second section considers reasons for the absence of pedagogical attention to acquiring background knowledge. The section then proceeds to identify key features of background knowledge through backwards design. The final section proposes a model of Presenting Historical Content through a detailed decomposition model, applies the model to a specific lesson example, and ends with reflections on the implications of this model of instruction.","PeriodicalId":83074,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"231 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presenting Historical Content: The Inquiry Connections of a Neglected Practice\",\"authors\":\"David J. Neumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00377996.2021.1896985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the last three decades, history education has focused overwhelmingly on inquiry. In teacher education, the recent turn to “Core Practices” or “High-Leverage Practices” (HLPs) has been applied to history education. Despite the attractiveness of inquiry-oriented instruction, it is still absent from far too many history classrooms. One major obstacle to implementation is the disregard for Presenting Historical Content as a core practice. Rather than dismissing “direct practice” as a self-evident practice, we should give it the same careful analysis accorded other HLPs. Used thoughtfully, Presenting Historical Content serves an essential pedagogical purpose in inquiry instruction: framing student investigation and providing the context necessary for high-level student work. The article begins by exploring the centrality of background knowledge for meaningful inquiry and then explores what happens when such knowledge is absent from secondary classroom instruction. The second section considers reasons for the absence of pedagogical attention to acquiring background knowledge. The section then proceeds to identify key features of background knowledge through backwards design. The final section proposes a model of Presenting Historical Content through a detailed decomposition model, applies the model to a specific lesson example, and ends with reflections on the implications of this model of instruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"231 - 246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2021.1896985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2021.1896985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的三十年里,历史教育主要集中在探究上。在教师教育方面,最近转向“核心实践”或“高杠杆实践”(hlp)已应用于历史教育。尽管以探究为导向的教学很有吸引力,但在太多的历史课堂上,它仍然是缺席的。实现的一个主要障碍是忽视了将历史内容呈现为核心实践。我们不应将“直接实践”视为不言自明的实践而不予理会,而应给予它与其他hlp一样的仔细分析。如果使用得当,“呈现历史内容”在探究性教学中具有重要的教学目的:为学生的调查提供框架,并为高水平的学生工作提供必要的背景。本文首先探讨背景知识对有意义探究的中心作用,然后探讨当这些知识在中学课堂教学中缺失时会发生什么。第二部分探讨了教学对获取背景知识缺乏关注的原因。然后,本节通过逆向设计来识别背景知识的关键特征。最后一节通过详细的分解模型提出了一个呈现历史内容的模型,并将该模型应用于具体的课程实例,最后对该教学模型的含义进行了反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Presenting Historical Content: The Inquiry Connections of a Neglected Practice
Abstract In the last three decades, history education has focused overwhelmingly on inquiry. In teacher education, the recent turn to “Core Practices” or “High-Leverage Practices” (HLPs) has been applied to history education. Despite the attractiveness of inquiry-oriented instruction, it is still absent from far too many history classrooms. One major obstacle to implementation is the disregard for Presenting Historical Content as a core practice. Rather than dismissing “direct practice” as a self-evident practice, we should give it the same careful analysis accorded other HLPs. Used thoughtfully, Presenting Historical Content serves an essential pedagogical purpose in inquiry instruction: framing student investigation and providing the context necessary for high-level student work. The article begins by exploring the centrality of background knowledge for meaningful inquiry and then explores what happens when such knowledge is absent from secondary classroom instruction. The second section considers reasons for the absence of pedagogical attention to acquiring background knowledge. The section then proceeds to identify key features of background knowledge through backwards design. The final section proposes a model of Presenting Historical Content through a detailed decomposition model, applies the model to a specific lesson example, and ends with reflections on the implications of this model of instruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信