“叠加”儿童早期干预措施减少学习成果不平等的潜力

Carly S Molloy, M. O’Connor, Shuaijun Guo, Colleen Lin, Christopher Harrop, Nicholas Perini, S. Goldfeld
{"title":"“叠加”儿童早期干预措施减少学习成果不平等的潜力","authors":"Carly S Molloy, M. O’Connor, Shuaijun Guo, Colleen Lin, Christopher Harrop, Nicholas Perini, S. Goldfeld","doi":"10.1136/jech-2019-212282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Early childhood interventions are critical for reducing child health and development inequities. While most research focuses on the efficacy of single interventions, combining multiple evidence-based strategies over the early years of a child’s life may yield greater impact. This study examined the association between exposure to a combination of five evidence-based services from 0 to 5 years on children’s reading at 8–9 years. Methods Data from the nationally representative birth cohort (n=5107) of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children were utilised. Risk and exposure measures across five services from 0 to 5 years were assessed: antenatal care, nurse home-visiting, early childhood education and care, parenting programme and the early years of school. Children’s reading at 8–9 years was measured using a standardised direct assessment. Linear regression analyses examined the cumulative effect of five services on reading. Interaction terms were examined to determine if the relationship differed as a function of level of disadvantage. Results A cumulative benefit effect of participation in more services and a cumulative risk effect when exposed to more risks was found. Each additional service that the child attended was associated with an increase in reading scores (b=9.16, 95% CI=5.58 to 12.75). Conversely, each additional risk that the child was exposed to was associated with a decrease in reading skills (b=−14.03, 95% CI=−16.61 to −11.44). Effects were similar for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged children. Conclusion This study supports the potential value of ‘stacking’ early interventions across the early years of a child’s life to maximise impacts on child outcomes.","PeriodicalId":15778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential of ‘stacking’ early childhood interventions to reduce inequities in learning outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Carly S Molloy, M. O’Connor, Shuaijun Guo, Colleen Lin, Christopher Harrop, Nicholas Perini, S. Goldfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jech-2019-212282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Early childhood interventions are critical for reducing child health and development inequities. While most research focuses on the efficacy of single interventions, combining multiple evidence-based strategies over the early years of a child’s life may yield greater impact. This study examined the association between exposure to a combination of five evidence-based services from 0 to 5 years on children’s reading at 8–9 years. Methods Data from the nationally representative birth cohort (n=5107) of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children were utilised. Risk and exposure measures across five services from 0 to 5 years were assessed: antenatal care, nurse home-visiting, early childhood education and care, parenting programme and the early years of school. Children’s reading at 8–9 years was measured using a standardised direct assessment. Linear regression analyses examined the cumulative effect of five services on reading. Interaction terms were examined to determine if the relationship differed as a function of level of disadvantage. Results A cumulative benefit effect of participation in more services and a cumulative risk effect when exposed to more risks was found. Each additional service that the child attended was associated with an increase in reading scores (b=9.16, 95% CI=5.58 to 12.75). Conversely, each additional risk that the child was exposed to was associated with a decrease in reading skills (b=−14.03, 95% CI=−16.61 to −11.44). Effects were similar for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged children. Conclusion This study supports the potential value of ‘stacking’ early interventions across the early years of a child’s life to maximise impacts on child outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-212282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-212282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

儿童早期干预措施对于减少儿童健康和发展不平等至关重要。虽然大多数研究关注的是单一干预措施的有效性,但将儿童生命早期的多种循证策略结合起来可能会产生更大的影响。本研究考察了0 - 5岁儿童接受五种基于证据的综合服务与8-9岁儿童阅读之间的关系。方法采用澳大利亚儿童纵向研究中具有全国代表性的出生队列数据(n=5107)。评估了五项0至5岁儿童服务的风险和接触措施:产前保健、护士家访、幼儿教育和护理、育儿方案和学校早期教育。8-9岁儿童的阅读能力是用标准化的直接评估来衡量的。线性回归分析检验了五种服务对阅读的累积影响。研究了相互作用项,以确定这种关系是否作为不利水平的函数而不同。结果发现参与服务越多,存在累积效益效应;风险暴露越大,存在累积风险效应。儿童参加的每项额外服务都与阅读分数的增加有关(b=9.16, 95% CI=5.58至12.75)。相反,儿童接触到的每一个额外的风险都与阅读技能的下降有关(b= - 14.03, 95% CI= - 16.61至- 11.44)。对弱势儿童和非弱势儿童的影响相似。本研究支持在儿童生命早期进行“堆叠”早期干预的潜在价值,以最大限度地影响儿童的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential of ‘stacking’ early childhood interventions to reduce inequities in learning outcomes
Background Early childhood interventions are critical for reducing child health and development inequities. While most research focuses on the efficacy of single interventions, combining multiple evidence-based strategies over the early years of a child’s life may yield greater impact. This study examined the association between exposure to a combination of five evidence-based services from 0 to 5 years on children’s reading at 8–9 years. Methods Data from the nationally representative birth cohort (n=5107) of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children were utilised. Risk and exposure measures across five services from 0 to 5 years were assessed: antenatal care, nurse home-visiting, early childhood education and care, parenting programme and the early years of school. Children’s reading at 8–9 years was measured using a standardised direct assessment. Linear regression analyses examined the cumulative effect of five services on reading. Interaction terms were examined to determine if the relationship differed as a function of level of disadvantage. Results A cumulative benefit effect of participation in more services and a cumulative risk effect when exposed to more risks was found. Each additional service that the child attended was associated with an increase in reading scores (b=9.16, 95% CI=5.58 to 12.75). Conversely, each additional risk that the child was exposed to was associated with a decrease in reading skills (b=−14.03, 95% CI=−16.61 to −11.44). Effects were similar for disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged children. Conclusion This study supports the potential value of ‘stacking’ early interventions across the early years of a child’s life to maximise impacts on child outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信