可见性与弹性策略:数字时代的女作家

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Miriam Borham-puyal, Daniel Escandell-Montiel
{"title":"可见性与弹性策略:数字时代的女作家","authors":"Miriam Borham-puyal, Daniel Escandell-Montiel","doi":"10.7771/1481-4374.3324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women’s presence in literary history has been particularly conditioned by their place in society and by the limited spheres in which their production was expected to appear (e.g. the sentimental novel, romances or children’s literature). In today’s digital, open and connected society, women continue to face visibility problems in the publishing industry and in the online spaces that grant presence and agency. Their role in cultural creations is still hindered by vertical powers that operate as main censors. This circumstance takes place even in a rhizomatic and decentralized virtual space, where dissident discourses have highlighted it, although without enough discursive power to create a full disruption in those monolithic powers capable of isolating and making invisible whole social and cultural sectors. Forcing women’s invisibility or limiting the scope of their production in cultural spheres results in adverse, when not downright traumatic, situations for these authors. The present study addresses the phenomenon of the neutralization of the female author and the strategies developed by women writing in Spanish and English in order to turn this situation around. Miriam Borham-Puyal and Daniel Escandell-Montiel, \"Strategies page 2 of 13 of (In)Visibility and Resilience: Women Writers in a Digital Era\" CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 22.4 (2020): http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol22/iss4/10 Miriam BORHAM-PUYAL and Daniel ESCANDELL-MONTIEL Strategies of (In)Visibility and Resilience: Women Writers in a Digital Era","PeriodicalId":44033,"journal":{"name":"CLCWEB-Comparative Literature and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies of (In)Visibility and Resilience: Women Writers in a Digital Era\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Borham-puyal, Daniel Escandell-Montiel\",\"doi\":\"10.7771/1481-4374.3324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Women’s presence in literary history has been particularly conditioned by their place in society and by the limited spheres in which their production was expected to appear (e.g. the sentimental novel, romances or children’s literature). In today’s digital, open and connected society, women continue to face visibility problems in the publishing industry and in the online spaces that grant presence and agency. Their role in cultural creations is still hindered by vertical powers that operate as main censors. This circumstance takes place even in a rhizomatic and decentralized virtual space, where dissident discourses have highlighted it, although without enough discursive power to create a full disruption in those monolithic powers capable of isolating and making invisible whole social and cultural sectors. Forcing women’s invisibility or limiting the scope of their production in cultural spheres results in adverse, when not downright traumatic, situations for these authors. The present study addresses the phenomenon of the neutralization of the female author and the strategies developed by women writing in Spanish and English in order to turn this situation around. Miriam Borham-Puyal and Daniel Escandell-Montiel, \\\"Strategies page 2 of 13 of (In)Visibility and Resilience: Women Writers in a Digital Era\\\" CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 22.4 (2020): http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol22/iss4/10 Miriam BORHAM-PUYAL and Daniel ESCANDELL-MONTIEL Strategies of (In)Visibility and Resilience: Women Writers in a Digital Era\",\"PeriodicalId\":44033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLCWEB-Comparative Literature and Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLCWEB-Comparative Literature and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3324\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLCWEB-Comparative Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

妇女在文学史上的地位特别受到她们在社会中的地位和她们的作品预计出现的有限领域(例如,感伤小说、浪漫小说或儿童文学)的制约。在当今这个数字化、开放和互联的社会中,女性在出版业和提供存在感和代理权的在线空间中,仍然面临着知名度问题。他们在文化创作中的作用仍然受到作为主要审查者的垂直权力的阻碍。这种情况甚至发生在一个根茎状和分散的虚拟空间中,在那里,持不同政见者的话语已经强调了这一点,尽管没有足够的话语力量来对那些能够孤立和隐形整个社会和文化部门的单一权力进行全面破坏。对这些作者来说,强迫女性隐身或限制她们在文化领域的创作范围,即使不是彻头彻尾的创伤,也会导致不利的局面。本研究探讨了女性作者被中性化的现象,以及女性在西班牙语和英语写作中为扭转这一局面所采取的策略。Miriam Borham-Puyal和Daniel escanddel - montiel,“(In)能见度和弹性:数字时代的女作家策略”,CLCWeb:比较文学与文化22.4 (2020):http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol22/iss4/10
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies of (In)Visibility and Resilience: Women Writers in a Digital Era
Women’s presence in literary history has been particularly conditioned by their place in society and by the limited spheres in which their production was expected to appear (e.g. the sentimental novel, romances or children’s literature). In today’s digital, open and connected society, women continue to face visibility problems in the publishing industry and in the online spaces that grant presence and agency. Their role in cultural creations is still hindered by vertical powers that operate as main censors. This circumstance takes place even in a rhizomatic and decentralized virtual space, where dissident discourses have highlighted it, although without enough discursive power to create a full disruption in those monolithic powers capable of isolating and making invisible whole social and cultural sectors. Forcing women’s invisibility or limiting the scope of their production in cultural spheres results in adverse, when not downright traumatic, situations for these authors. The present study addresses the phenomenon of the neutralization of the female author and the strategies developed by women writing in Spanish and English in order to turn this situation around. Miriam Borham-Puyal and Daniel Escandell-Montiel, "Strategies page 2 of 13 of (In)Visibility and Resilience: Women Writers in a Digital Era" CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 22.4 (2020): http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol22/iss4/10 Miriam BORHAM-PUYAL and Daniel ESCANDELL-MONTIEL Strategies of (In)Visibility and Resilience: Women Writers in a Digital Era
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The intellectual trajectory of CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture is located in the humanities and social sciences in the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Comparative cultural studies is a contextual approach in the study of culture in all of its products and processes; its theoretical and methodological framework is built on tenets borrowed from the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies and from a range of thought including literary and culture theory, systems theory, and communication theories; in comparative cultural studies focus is on theory and method, as well as on application; in comparative cultural studies metaphorical argumentation and description are discouraged; the intellectual trajectory of the journal includes the postulate to work in a global and intercultural context with a plurality of methods and approaches, and in interdisciplinarity in the study of the processes of communicative action(s) in culture, the production and processes of culture, the products of culture, and the study of the how of these processes; the epistemological bases of comparative cultural studies are in (radical) constructivism and in methodology the contextual (systemic and empirical) approach is favored (however, comparative cultural studies does not exclude textual analysis proper or other established fields of scholarship).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信