综合研究了不同的光伏峰值功率跟踪方法

2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA) Pub Date : 2017-11-01 DOI:10.1109/ICRERA.2017.8191221

Abdelhakim Belkaid, Unarm Colak, K. Kayisli

{"title":"综合研究了不同的光伏峰值功率跟踪方法","authors":"Abdelhakim Belkaid, Unarm Colak, K. Kayisli","doi":"10.1109/ICRERA.2017.8191221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this document is to give a wide-ranging comparison between different photovoltaic (PV) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods. The MPPTs considered in this work are perturb and observe (PO), incremental conductance (IC), sliding mode (SM), and fuzzy logic (FL) tracker. A model of MSX 60 solar module and the different MPPTs applied to a boost chopper was simulated by means of Matlab/Simulink software. The different MPPTs were evaluated in fast changing climatic conditions using a rigorous profile as recommended by the EN 50530. A comprehensive comparison between these MPPTs is done using five assessment criteria indicators. The results demonstrate that, FL offers satisfactory performance in both steady-state and dynamic response comparing to other techniques.","PeriodicalId":6535,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA)","volume":"27 1","pages":"1073-1079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive study of different photovoltaic peak power tracking methods\",\"authors\":\"Abdelhakim Belkaid, Unarm Colak, K. Kayisli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICRERA.2017.8191221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this document is to give a wide-ranging comparison between different photovoltaic (PV) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods. The MPPTs considered in this work are perturb and observe (PO), incremental conductance (IC), sliding mode (SM), and fuzzy logic (FL) tracker. A model of MSX 60 solar module and the different MPPTs applied to a boost chopper was simulated by means of Matlab/Simulink software. The different MPPTs were evaluated in fast changing climatic conditions using a rigorous profile as recommended by the EN 50530. A comprehensive comparison between these MPPTs is done using five assessment criteria indicators. The results demonstrate that, FL offers satisfactory performance in both steady-state and dynamic response comparing to other techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"1073-1079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRERA.2017.8191221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRERA.2017.8191221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 31

摘要

本文的目的是对不同光伏(PV)最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)方法进行广泛的比较。在这项工作中考虑的MPPTs是摄动和观察(PO)，增量电导(IC)，滑模(SM)和模糊逻辑(FL)跟踪器。利用Matlab/Simulink软件对msx60太阳能模块模型和应用于升压斩波器的不同MPPTs进行了仿真。在快速变化的气候条件下，使用EN 50530推荐的严格剖面对不同的mppt进行了评估。使用五个评估标准指标对这些mppt进行了全面比较。结果表明，与其他技术相比，FL在稳态和动态响应方面都具有令人满意的性能。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A comprehensive study of different photovoltaic peak power tracking methods

The purpose of this document is to give a wide-ranging comparison between different photovoltaic (PV) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods. The MPPTs considered in this work are perturb and observe (PO), incremental conductance (IC), sliding mode (SM), and fuzzy logic (FL) tracker. A model of MSX 60 solar module and the different MPPTs applied to a boost chopper was simulated by means of Matlab/Simulink software. The different MPPTs were evaluated in fast changing climatic conditions using a rigorous profile as recommended by the EN 50530. A comprehensive comparison between these MPPTs is done using five assessment criteria indicators. The results demonstrate that, FL offers satisfactory performance in both steady-state and dynamic response comparing to other techniques.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA)

自引率

0.00%

发文量