韩国报纸对气候变化报道的比较分析:以保守、进步和经济报纸为重点

Sun-Jin Yun, Dowan Ku, Nyunbae Park, Joon Han
{"title":"韩国报纸对气候变化报道的比较分析:以保守、进步和经济报纸为重点","authors":"Sun-Jin Yun, Dowan Ku, Nyunbae Park, Joon Han","doi":"10.21588/DNS.2012.41.2.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares and analyzes the contents and sources of news articles on climate change in three major South Korean newspapers between 2007 and 2008. Chosunilbo, Hankyoreh, and Maeil Business were selected as subjects for this study because these three newspapers are representative of the conservative, progressive, and economic newspapers in South Korea, respectively. The key questions asked in this paper are as follows: 1) How do these selected newspapers portray climate change? 2) What kind of sources do they cite, and how do these sources differ? 3) What kind of solutions do the newspapers recommend in dealing with climate change? South Korean press has handled the climate change issue largely from a prognostic frame, placing emphasis on reports concerning policy determination and mitigation policies. The most frequently cited source in all the newspapers was the government. There were differences in the emphasis of each newspaper, however: The conservative newspaper and the business newspaper both supported the policy of sustaining capitalistic economic growth while maintaining existing economic and social structures. The progressive newspaper called for active reduction in the amount of GHG emissions and took a critical position on high-risk and big technologies such as nuclear power generation.","PeriodicalId":84572,"journal":{"name":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","volume":"8 1","pages":"201-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of South Korean Newspaper Coverage on Climate Change : Focusing on Conservative, Progressive, and Economic Newspapers\",\"authors\":\"Sun-Jin Yun, Dowan Ku, Nyunbae Park, Joon Han\",\"doi\":\"10.21588/DNS.2012.41.2.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares and analyzes the contents and sources of news articles on climate change in three major South Korean newspapers between 2007 and 2008. Chosunilbo, Hankyoreh, and Maeil Business were selected as subjects for this study because these three newspapers are representative of the conservative, progressive, and economic newspapers in South Korea, respectively. The key questions asked in this paper are as follows: 1) How do these selected newspapers portray climate change? 2) What kind of sources do they cite, and how do these sources differ? 3) What kind of solutions do the newspapers recommend in dealing with climate change? South Korean press has handled the climate change issue largely from a prognostic frame, placing emphasis on reports concerning policy determination and mitigation policies. The most frequently cited source in all the newspapers was the government. There were differences in the emphasis of each newspaper, however: The conservative newspaper and the business newspaper both supported the policy of sustaining capitalistic economic growth while maintaining existing economic and social structures. The progressive newspaper called for active reduction in the amount of GHG emissions and took a critical position on high-risk and big technologies such as nuclear power generation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"201-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21588/DNS.2012.41.2.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21588/DNS.2012.41.2.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文对2007 - 2008年韩国三大报纸关于气候变化的新闻内容和来源进行了比较分析。之所以选择《朝鲜日报》、《韩民族日报》和《每日经济》作为研究对象,是因为这三家报纸分别是韩国保守、进步和经济报纸的代表。本文提出的关键问题如下:1)这些选定的报纸如何描绘气候变化?2)他们引用了什么样的来源,这些来源有什么不同?3)报纸推荐什么样的解决方案来应对气候变化?韩国媒体在处理气候变化问题时,主要从预测的框架出发,强调有关政策确定和缓解政策的报道。所有报纸最常引用的消息来源是政府。但是,各报纸的侧重点有所不同:保守主义报纸和经济报纸都支持维持资本主义经济增长的政策,同时维持现有的经济和社会结构。该报呼吁积极减少温室气体的排放量,并对核电等高风险的大型技术持批评态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of South Korean Newspaper Coverage on Climate Change : Focusing on Conservative, Progressive, and Economic Newspapers
This paper compares and analyzes the contents and sources of news articles on climate change in three major South Korean newspapers between 2007 and 2008. Chosunilbo, Hankyoreh, and Maeil Business were selected as subjects for this study because these three newspapers are representative of the conservative, progressive, and economic newspapers in South Korea, respectively. The key questions asked in this paper are as follows: 1) How do these selected newspapers portray climate change? 2) What kind of sources do they cite, and how do these sources differ? 3) What kind of solutions do the newspapers recommend in dealing with climate change? South Korean press has handled the climate change issue largely from a prognostic frame, placing emphasis on reports concerning policy determination and mitigation policies. The most frequently cited source in all the newspapers was the government. There were differences in the emphasis of each newspaper, however: The conservative newspaper and the business newspaper both supported the policy of sustaining capitalistic economic growth while maintaining existing economic and social structures. The progressive newspaper called for active reduction in the amount of GHG emissions and took a critical position on high-risk and big technologies such as nuclear power generation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信