{"title":"如何赢得进化军备竞赛","authors":"Anil Somayaji","doi":"10.1109/MSP.2004.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To keep up with malware writers, software producers in both the commercial and open-source software worlds have adopted various automatic software update mechanisms. Some of these mechanisms distribute updates after requesting a user's permission; others install updates automatically. Although such systems provide some short-term relief, they will likely soon become ineffective, and further, they will also become extremely dangerous once they are inevitably co-opted by attackers. If we want the Internet to remain a viable way to communicate and collaborate, we must adopt another, perhaps radically different, model for securing our computers. To better understand this conclusion, we should first re-examine why developers and users are embracing automated update systems.","PeriodicalId":90300,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy","volume":"5 1","pages":"70-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to win an evolutionary arms race\",\"authors\":\"Anil Somayaji\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MSP.2004.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To keep up with malware writers, software producers in both the commercial and open-source software worlds have adopted various automatic software update mechanisms. Some of these mechanisms distribute updates after requesting a user's permission; others install updates automatically. Although such systems provide some short-term relief, they will likely soon become ineffective, and further, they will also become extremely dangerous once they are inevitably co-opted by attackers. If we want the Internet to remain a viable way to communicate and collaborate, we must adopt another, perhaps radically different, model for securing our computers. To better understand this conclusion, we should first re-examine why developers and users are embracing automated update systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"70-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2004.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2004.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
To keep up with malware writers, software producers in both the commercial and open-source software worlds have adopted various automatic software update mechanisms. Some of these mechanisms distribute updates after requesting a user's permission; others install updates automatically. Although such systems provide some short-term relief, they will likely soon become ineffective, and further, they will also become extremely dangerous once they are inevitably co-opted by attackers. If we want the Internet to remain a viable way to communicate and collaborate, we must adopt another, perhaps radically different, model for securing our computers. To better understand this conclusion, we should first re-examine why developers and users are embracing automated update systems.