用基于反应时间的测量方法间接评估态度

IF 1.1 3区社会学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI:10.1024/0044-3514.37.3.131

Juliane Degner, D. Wentura, K. Rothermund

{"title":"用基于反应时间的测量方法间接评估态度","authors":"Juliane Degner, D. Wentura, K. Rothermund","doi":"10.1024/0044-3514.37.3.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: We review research on response-latency based (“implicit”) measures of attitudes by examining what hopes and intentions researchers have associated with their usage. We identified the hopes of (1) gaining better measures of interindividual differences in attitudes as compared to self-report measures (quality hope); (2) better predicting behavior, or predicting other behaviors, as compared to self-reports (incremental validity hope); (3) linking social-cognitive theories more adequately to empirical research (theory-link hope). We argue that the third hope should be the starting point for using these measures. Any attempt to improve these measures should include the search for a small-scale theory that adequately explains the basic effects found with such a measure. To date, small-scale theories for different measures are not equally well developed.","PeriodicalId":46893,"journal":{"name":"Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indirect Assessment of Attitudes with Response-Time-Based Measures\",\"authors\":\"Juliane Degner, D. Wentura, K. Rothermund\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/0044-3514.37.3.131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: We review research on response-latency based (“implicit”) measures of attitudes by examining what hopes and intentions researchers have associated with their usage. We identified the hopes of (1) gaining better measures of interindividual differences in attitudes as compared to self-report measures (quality hope); (2) better predicting behavior, or predicting other behaviors, as compared to self-reports (incremental validity hope); (3) linking social-cognitive theories more adequately to empirical research (theory-link hope). We argue that the third hope should be the starting point for using these measures. Any attempt to improve these measures should include the search for a small-scale theory that adequately explains the basic effects found with such a measure. To date, small-scale theories for different measures are not equally well developed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.37.3.131\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.37.3.131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 23

摘要

摘要:本文回顾了基于反应滞后(“内隐”)态度测量方法的研究，考察了研究人员对态度使用的期望和意图。我们确定了以下希望:(1)与自我报告测量(质量希望)相比，获得更好的个体间态度差异测量;(2)与自我报告相比，更能预测行为或其他行为(增量效度希望);(3)将社会认知理论更充分地与实证研究联系起来(理论联系希望)。我们认为，第三个希望应该是使用这些措施的起点。任何改进这些措施的尝试都应包括寻找一种小规模理论，以充分解释这种措施所产生的基本影响。到目前为止，不同测量方法的小规模理论还没有同样完善。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Indirect Assessment of Attitudes with Response-Time-Based Measures

Abstract: We review research on response-latency based (“implicit”) measures of attitudes by examining what hopes and intentions researchers have associated with their usage. We identified the hopes of (1) gaining better measures of interindividual differences in attitudes as compared to self-report measures (quality hope); (2) better predicting behavior, or predicting other behaviors, as compared to self-reports (incremental validity hope); (3) linking social-cognitive theories more adequately to empirical research (theory-link hope). We argue that the third hope should be the starting point for using these measures. Any attempt to improve these measures should include the search for a small-scale theory that adequately explains the basic effects found with such a measure. To date, small-scale theories for different measures are not equally well developed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie Multiple-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The sociology journal Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (KZfSS) ("Cologne Journal of Sociology and Social Psychology") was founded in 1948 by the Cologne sociologist Leopold von Wiese as the Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie. His successor, René König, broadened the journal''s scope towards social psychological topics, including cultural sociology and qualitative social research, which gave the journal its current name. KZfSS is the most important sociological publication in the German-speaking world in terms of its scope and distribution. It publishes comprehensively on German sociological research in all disciplines and regularly communicates research results from many countries around the world. KZfSS follows the model of a universal sociology journal. In addition to more than 40 double-blind peer-reviewed original research articles per year, it publishes detailed literature reviews and book reviews of German and international literature in a comprehensive review section. The journal thus provides a forum for sociological research and open discussion. Special emphasis is placed on offering young colleagues an opportunity for their first publication. The journal is included in many renowned scientific Abstracting & Indexing databases such as the Social Science Citation Index. In addition to the four annual issues, a supplement coordinated by guest editors is published annually.