摘要P6-04-01:一项比较新型口服SERD AZD9496与氟维司汀在新诊断的ER+ HER2-原发性乳腺癌患者中的术前机会窗口研究

J. Robertson, A. Evans, S. Henschen, C. Kirwan, A. Jahan, L. Kenny, J. Dixon, P. Schmid, A. Kothari, Omar Mohamed, P. Fasching, K. Cheung, R. Wuerstlein, Danielle Carroll, T. Klinowska, J. Lindemann, Alexander MacDonald, R. Mather, R. Maudsley, M. Moschetta, M. Nikolaou, M. Roudier, T. Sarvotham, G. Schiavon, Diansong Zhou, Li Zhou, N. Harbeck
{"title":"摘要P6-04-01:一项比较新型口服SERD AZD9496与氟维司汀在新诊断的ER+ HER2-原发性乳腺癌患者中的术前机会窗口研究","authors":"J. Robertson, A. Evans, S. Henschen, C. Kirwan, A. Jahan, L. Kenny, J. Dixon, P. Schmid, A. Kothari, Omar Mohamed, P. Fasching, K. Cheung, R. Wuerstlein, Danielle Carroll, T. Klinowska, J. Lindemann, Alexander MacDonald, R. Mather, R. Maudsley, M. Moschetta, M. Nikolaou, M. Roudier, T. Sarvotham, G. Schiavon, Diansong Zhou, Li Zhou, N. Harbeck","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p6-04-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is routinely treated with endocrine therapies targeting the ER axis. However, primary and secondary resistance ultimately limits the use of these agents. Fulvestrant (FULV) is the first-in-class selective ER degrader (SERD) clinically effective in patients with ER+ breast cancer, both naive and resistant to tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. FULV has low oral bioavailability, and its dose-dependent pharmacodynamic (PD) activity and clinical efficacy is limited by the currently approved maximal feasible dose (MFD) of 500 mg, which is administered monthly as two intramuscular injections. AZD9496 is an orally bioavailable, nonsteroidal, selective and potent degrader and antagonist of ER in preclinical models. This pre-surgical, window of opportunity study (NCT03236974) compared PD changes and the PD/pharmacokinetic (PK) relationships of AZD9496 with FULV in patients with newly diagnosed ER+ HER2- breast cancer awaiting curative intent surgery.Methods: In this open-label, multicenter study, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive oral AZD9496 250 mg BID from Day 1 for 5-14 days or FULV 500 mg administered intramuscularly on Day 1 only. On-treatment image-guided core tumor biopsies were taken between Days 5 and 14. The primary objective was to compare the effects of AZD9496 and FULV on ER expression in tumor tissue using pre-dose biopsies as baseline. Secondary objectives were changes in progesterone receptor (PR) and Ki-67 biomarkers, AZD9496 and FULV plasma concentrations during treatment, and safety. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine ER and PR H-scores, and Ki-67 index, and treatment effects were compared using an analysis of covariance model. Blood samples for PK analysis were taken at on-treatment biopsy and 1-2 hours afterwards. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from screening through to a follow-up visit 28 days after the last study dose.Results: Of the 49 women enrolled, 46 received treatment (AZD9496 n=22; FULV n=24) and of these, 35 paired biopsies were evaluable (AZD9496 n=15; FULV n=20). The least square mean estimate for the reduction in ER H-score after AZD9496 treatment was 24% (80% CI: 34.4, 14.3), and after FULV treatment was 36% (44.9, 27.7), with a least square mean difference between AZD9496 and FULV of 12% (p=0.86). AZD9496 was not superior to FULV in terms of ER modulation at the tested dose. AZD9496 also reduced PR H-scores and Ki-67 levels from baseline (by 33.3% and 39.9%, respectively). These effects were not statistically superior to FULV at the tested dose (PR: -68.7%, p=0.97; Ki 67: 75.4%, p=0.98).Plasma exposure of AZD9496 (AUC -40%, Cmax -25%) was lower than predicted based on PK data from the previous phase 1 study, whereas FULV exposure was consistent with historical data. No clear exposure-response relationship for plasma concentration at biopsy and PD markers for AZD9496 or FULV were observed.The median treatment duration of AZD9496 was 9.5 days (range: 6-15), and the relative dose intensity was 100% (range: 90-125); no patients discontinued AZD9496. AZD9496 and FULV were both well tolerated, and no new safety findings were identified. No grade ≥3 toxicities or serious AEs occurred. Conclusion: AZD9496 250 mg BID reduced ER, PR and Ki-67 expression, and as such, is the first pre surgical study to demonstrate an oral SERD impacting its key biological targets. These reductions were not superior to the FULV clinically approved dose, which performed as expected based on historical data. Pre-surgical studies represent an important method to test the proof of mechanism of novel SERDs early in clinical development. Citation Format: John FR Robertson, Abigail Evans, Stephan Henschen, Cliona Kirwan, Ali Jahan, Laura Kenny, J. Michael Dixon, Peter Schmid, Ashutosh Kothari, Omar Mohamed, Peter A Fasching, Kwok-Leung Cheung, Rachel Wuerstlein, Danielle Carroll, Teresa Klinowska, Justin PO Lindemann, Alexander MacDonald, Richard Mather, Rhiannon Maudsley, Michele Moschetta, Myria Nikolaou, Martine P Roudier, Tinnu Sarvotham, Gaia Schiavon, Diansong Zhou, Li Zhou, Nadia Harbeck. A pre-surgical, window of opportunity study comparing the novel oral SERD AZD9496 with fulvestrant in patients with newly diagnosed ER+ HER2- primary breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-04-01.","PeriodicalId":20307,"journal":{"name":"Poster Session Abstracts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract P6-04-01: A pre-surgical, window of opportunity study comparing the novel oral SERD AZD9496 with fulvestrant in patients with newly diagnosed ER+ HER2- primary breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"J. Robertson, A. Evans, S. Henschen, C. Kirwan, A. Jahan, L. Kenny, J. Dixon, P. Schmid, A. Kothari, Omar Mohamed, P. Fasching, K. Cheung, R. Wuerstlein, Danielle Carroll, T. Klinowska, J. Lindemann, Alexander MacDonald, R. Mather, R. Maudsley, M. Moschetta, M. Nikolaou, M. Roudier, T. Sarvotham, G. Schiavon, Diansong Zhou, Li Zhou, N. Harbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p6-04-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is routinely treated with endocrine therapies targeting the ER axis. However, primary and secondary resistance ultimately limits the use of these agents. Fulvestrant (FULV) is the first-in-class selective ER degrader (SERD) clinically effective in patients with ER+ breast cancer, both naive and resistant to tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. FULV has low oral bioavailability, and its dose-dependent pharmacodynamic (PD) activity and clinical efficacy is limited by the currently approved maximal feasible dose (MFD) of 500 mg, which is administered monthly as two intramuscular injections. AZD9496 is an orally bioavailable, nonsteroidal, selective and potent degrader and antagonist of ER in preclinical models. This pre-surgical, window of opportunity study (NCT03236974) compared PD changes and the PD/pharmacokinetic (PK) relationships of AZD9496 with FULV in patients with newly diagnosed ER+ HER2- breast cancer awaiting curative intent surgery.Methods: In this open-label, multicenter study, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive oral AZD9496 250 mg BID from Day 1 for 5-14 days or FULV 500 mg administered intramuscularly on Day 1 only. On-treatment image-guided core tumor biopsies were taken between Days 5 and 14. The primary objective was to compare the effects of AZD9496 and FULV on ER expression in tumor tissue using pre-dose biopsies as baseline. Secondary objectives were changes in progesterone receptor (PR) and Ki-67 biomarkers, AZD9496 and FULV plasma concentrations during treatment, and safety. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine ER and PR H-scores, and Ki-67 index, and treatment effects were compared using an analysis of covariance model. Blood samples for PK analysis were taken at on-treatment biopsy and 1-2 hours afterwards. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from screening through to a follow-up visit 28 days after the last study dose.Results: Of the 49 women enrolled, 46 received treatment (AZD9496 n=22; FULV n=24) and of these, 35 paired biopsies were evaluable (AZD9496 n=15; FULV n=20). The least square mean estimate for the reduction in ER H-score after AZD9496 treatment was 24% (80% CI: 34.4, 14.3), and after FULV treatment was 36% (44.9, 27.7), with a least square mean difference between AZD9496 and FULV of 12% (p=0.86). AZD9496 was not superior to FULV in terms of ER modulation at the tested dose. AZD9496 also reduced PR H-scores and Ki-67 levels from baseline (by 33.3% and 39.9%, respectively). These effects were not statistically superior to FULV at the tested dose (PR: -68.7%, p=0.97; Ki 67: 75.4%, p=0.98).Plasma exposure of AZD9496 (AUC -40%, Cmax -25%) was lower than predicted based on PK data from the previous phase 1 study, whereas FULV exposure was consistent with historical data. No clear exposure-response relationship for plasma concentration at biopsy and PD markers for AZD9496 or FULV were observed.The median treatment duration of AZD9496 was 9.5 days (range: 6-15), and the relative dose intensity was 100% (range: 90-125); no patients discontinued AZD9496. AZD9496 and FULV were both well tolerated, and no new safety findings were identified. No grade ≥3 toxicities or serious AEs occurred. Conclusion: AZD9496 250 mg BID reduced ER, PR and Ki-67 expression, and as such, is the first pre surgical study to demonstrate an oral SERD impacting its key biological targets. These reductions were not superior to the FULV clinically approved dose, which performed as expected based on historical data. Pre-surgical studies represent an important method to test the proof of mechanism of novel SERDs early in clinical development. Citation Format: John FR Robertson, Abigail Evans, Stephan Henschen, Cliona Kirwan, Ali Jahan, Laura Kenny, J. Michael Dixon, Peter Schmid, Ashutosh Kothari, Omar Mohamed, Peter A Fasching, Kwok-Leung Cheung, Rachel Wuerstlein, Danielle Carroll, Teresa Klinowska, Justin PO Lindemann, Alexander MacDonald, Richard Mather, Rhiannon Maudsley, Michele Moschetta, Myria Nikolaou, Martine P Roudier, Tinnu Sarvotham, Gaia Schiavon, Diansong Zhou, Li Zhou, Nadia Harbeck. A pre-surgical, window of opportunity study comparing the novel oral SERD AZD9496 with fulvestrant in patients with newly diagnosed ER+ HER2- primary breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-04-01.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poster Session Abstracts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poster Session Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p6-04-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poster Session Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p6-04-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:雌激素受体阳性(ER+)乳腺癌的常规治疗是针对ER轴的内分泌治疗。然而,原发性和继发性耐药性最终限制了这些药物的使用。Fulvestrant (FULV)是一种一流的选择性ER降解剂(SERD),对ER+乳腺癌患者临床有效,无论是初发患者还是对他莫昔芬和芳香酶抑制剂耐药的患者。FULV具有较低的口服生物利用度,其剂量依赖性药效学(PD)活性和临床疗效受到目前批准的最大可行剂量(MFD)为500 mg的限制,该剂量为每月两次肌肉注射。AZD9496在临床前模型中是一种口服生物可利用、非甾体、选择性和有效的ER降解和拮抗剂。这项手术前的机会之窗研究(NCT03236974)比较了新诊断的ER+ HER2-乳腺癌等待治愈性手术患者的PD变化以及AZD9496与FULV的PD/药代动力学(PK)关系。方法:在这项开放标签、多中心的研究中,患者以1:1的比例随机分配,从第1天开始口服AZD9496 250 mg BID,持续5-14天,或仅在第1天肌肉注射500 mg FULV。在第5天至第14天之间进行治疗期间图像引导的核心肿瘤活检。主要目的是比较AZD9496和FULV对肿瘤组织中ER表达的影响,以剂量前活检为基线。次要目标是治疗期间孕激素受体(PR)和Ki-67生物标志物、AZD9496和FULV血浆浓度的变化以及安全性。采用免疫组化法测定ER、PR h评分及Ki-67指数,采用协方差分析模型比较治疗效果。在治疗前和治疗后1-2小时取血样进行PK分析。不良事件(ae)从筛选到最后一次研究剂量后28天的随访进行监测。结果:入组的49名女性中,46名接受了治疗(AZD9496 n=22;FULV n=24),其中35对活检是可评估的(AZD9496 n=15;FULV n = 20)。AZD9496治疗后ER h -评分降低的最小二乘平均估计值为24% (80% CI: 34.4, 14.3),而FULV治疗后ER h -评分降低的最小二乘平均估计值为36% (44.9,27.7),AZD9496和FULV治疗后的最小二乘平均差为12% (p=0.86)。在试验剂量下,AZD9496在内质网调节方面并不优于FULV。AZD9496还降低了PR h评分和Ki-67水平(分别降低33.3%和39.9%)。在试验剂量下,这些效应在统计学上并不优于FULV (PR: -68.7%, p=0.97;Ki 67: 75.4%, p=0.98)。AZD9496的血浆暴露(AUC -40%, Cmax -25%)低于基于先前1期研究的PK数据的预测,而FULV暴露与历史数据一致。AZD9496或FULV的活检血浆浓度和PD标志物没有明显的暴露-反应关系。AZD9496的中位治疗时间为9.5天(范围:6 ~ 15),相对剂量强度为100%(范围:90 ~ 125);没有患者停用AZD9496。AZD9496和FULV均具有良好的耐受性,未发现新的安全性发现。未发生≥3级毒性反应或严重不良反应。结论:AZD9496 250 mg BID降低了ER、PR和Ki-67的表达,因此,这是第一个证明口服SERD影响其关键生物学靶点的术前研究。这些减少并不优于临床批准的FULV剂量,根据历史数据,FULV的表现符合预期。术前研究是在临床开发早期验证新型serd机制的重要方法。引文格式:John FR Robertson、Abigail Evans、Stephan Henschen、Cliona Kirwan、Ali Jahan、Laura Kenny、J. Michael Dixon、Peter Schmid、Ashutosh Kothari、Omar Mohamed、Peter A Fasching、Cheung - leung、Rachel Wuerstlein、Danielle Carroll、Teresa Klinowska、Justin PO Lindemann、Alexander MacDonald、Richard Mather、Rhiannon Maudsley、Michele Moschetta、Myria Nikolaou、Tinnu Sarvotham、Gaia Schiavon、周迪松、Li Zhou、Nadia Harbeck。一项在手术前比较新型口服SERD AZD9496与氟维司汀治疗新诊断的ER+ HER2原发性乳腺癌患者的机会之窗研究[摘要]。摘自:2019年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2019年12月10日至14日;费城(PA): AACR;中国癌症杂志2020;20(增刊):P6-04-01。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract P6-04-01: A pre-surgical, window of opportunity study comparing the novel oral SERD AZD9496 with fulvestrant in patients with newly diagnosed ER+ HER2- primary breast cancer
Background: Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is routinely treated with endocrine therapies targeting the ER axis. However, primary and secondary resistance ultimately limits the use of these agents. Fulvestrant (FULV) is the first-in-class selective ER degrader (SERD) clinically effective in patients with ER+ breast cancer, both naive and resistant to tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors. FULV has low oral bioavailability, and its dose-dependent pharmacodynamic (PD) activity and clinical efficacy is limited by the currently approved maximal feasible dose (MFD) of 500 mg, which is administered monthly as two intramuscular injections. AZD9496 is an orally bioavailable, nonsteroidal, selective and potent degrader and antagonist of ER in preclinical models. This pre-surgical, window of opportunity study (NCT03236974) compared PD changes and the PD/pharmacokinetic (PK) relationships of AZD9496 with FULV in patients with newly diagnosed ER+ HER2- breast cancer awaiting curative intent surgery.Methods: In this open-label, multicenter study, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive oral AZD9496 250 mg BID from Day 1 for 5-14 days or FULV 500 mg administered intramuscularly on Day 1 only. On-treatment image-guided core tumor biopsies were taken between Days 5 and 14. The primary objective was to compare the effects of AZD9496 and FULV on ER expression in tumor tissue using pre-dose biopsies as baseline. Secondary objectives were changes in progesterone receptor (PR) and Ki-67 biomarkers, AZD9496 and FULV plasma concentrations during treatment, and safety. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine ER and PR H-scores, and Ki-67 index, and treatment effects were compared using an analysis of covariance model. Blood samples for PK analysis were taken at on-treatment biopsy and 1-2 hours afterwards. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from screening through to a follow-up visit 28 days after the last study dose.Results: Of the 49 women enrolled, 46 received treatment (AZD9496 n=22; FULV n=24) and of these, 35 paired biopsies were evaluable (AZD9496 n=15; FULV n=20). The least square mean estimate for the reduction in ER H-score after AZD9496 treatment was 24% (80% CI: 34.4, 14.3), and after FULV treatment was 36% (44.9, 27.7), with a least square mean difference between AZD9496 and FULV of 12% (p=0.86). AZD9496 was not superior to FULV in terms of ER modulation at the tested dose. AZD9496 also reduced PR H-scores and Ki-67 levels from baseline (by 33.3% and 39.9%, respectively). These effects were not statistically superior to FULV at the tested dose (PR: -68.7%, p=0.97; Ki 67: 75.4%, p=0.98).Plasma exposure of AZD9496 (AUC -40%, Cmax -25%) was lower than predicted based on PK data from the previous phase 1 study, whereas FULV exposure was consistent with historical data. No clear exposure-response relationship for plasma concentration at biopsy and PD markers for AZD9496 or FULV were observed.The median treatment duration of AZD9496 was 9.5 days (range: 6-15), and the relative dose intensity was 100% (range: 90-125); no patients discontinued AZD9496. AZD9496 and FULV were both well tolerated, and no new safety findings were identified. No grade ≥3 toxicities or serious AEs occurred. Conclusion: AZD9496 250 mg BID reduced ER, PR and Ki-67 expression, and as such, is the first pre surgical study to demonstrate an oral SERD impacting its key biological targets. These reductions were not superior to the FULV clinically approved dose, which performed as expected based on historical data. Pre-surgical studies represent an important method to test the proof of mechanism of novel SERDs early in clinical development. Citation Format: John FR Robertson, Abigail Evans, Stephan Henschen, Cliona Kirwan, Ali Jahan, Laura Kenny, J. Michael Dixon, Peter Schmid, Ashutosh Kothari, Omar Mohamed, Peter A Fasching, Kwok-Leung Cheung, Rachel Wuerstlein, Danielle Carroll, Teresa Klinowska, Justin PO Lindemann, Alexander MacDonald, Richard Mather, Rhiannon Maudsley, Michele Moschetta, Myria Nikolaou, Martine P Roudier, Tinnu Sarvotham, Gaia Schiavon, Diansong Zhou, Li Zhou, Nadia Harbeck. A pre-surgical, window of opportunity study comparing the novel oral SERD AZD9496 with fulvestrant in patients with newly diagnosed ER+ HER2- primary breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-04-01.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信